Elizabeth was born on March 16, 1690 in Rehoboth. Her parents were Timothy Ide (1660 - 1735) and Elizabeth Cooper Ide (1662 - 1745). She was the second oldest child:
Timothy Ide (1688 - 1768)
Elizabeth Ide Whitaker (1690 - 1755)
Mary Ide Read (1692 - 1754)
Sarah Ide Carpenter (1694 - 1771)
Experience Ide Lindley (1696 - 1751)
Rachel Ide Glover (1696 - 1780)
Josiah Ide (1698 - 1731)
Daniel Ide (1701 - 1753)
Elizabeth was married first Daniel Read on December 8, 1715 in Rehoboth, Bristol County, Massachusetts. Their children are:
Daniel Read (1716 - 1801)
Noah Read (1718 - 1778)
Elizabeth Read Cushman (1721 - 1762)
Samuel Read (1723 - 1818)
Rachel Read Brown (1728 - 1821)
Elizabeth married a second time to Noah Whitaker, on 21 Apr 1743.
Elizabeth passed away in 1755 and is buried at Newman Cemetery, East Providence, Providence County, Rhode Island.
↑ "Massachusetts Births and Christenings, 1639-1915," database, FamilySearch ([1] :Elizabeth Ide in entry for Noah Read, 17 Feb 1718; citing ATTLEBORO, BRISTOL, MASSACHUSETTS, ; FHL microfilm 0982348 IT 1.
↑ James N. Arnold, Vital Records of Rehoboth Massachusetts 1642-1896, 1897, pages 396 & 889.
Is Elizabeth your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Elizabeth by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Elizabeth:
~0.39% ~0.78%Curtis Preece :
AncestryDNA, GEDmatch B218216[compare], yourDNAportal CUR0a12ff46, Ancestry member curtispreece99
+
Family Tree DNA Family Finder, GEDmatch A356081[compare], yourDNAportal CUR0a12ff46, FTDNA kit #8218216
Are there any sources for the marriage to Timothy Read? Since she married Daniel Read II in 1715 when Timothy was still alive, it would be highly unlikely for her to have a previous living husband, given the rarity of divorce in this period.
I would suggest separating them unless a source is identified.
I would suggest separating them unless a source is identified.