Hannah was born say 1641, the daughter of John and Katheryne Jackson.[1][2]
Hannah Jackson married William Averell or Averill on 31 July 1661 in Ipswich, Massachusetts. [3][4]
William's will was in probate on 30 Jun 1691 in Essex, Massachusetts. [5]
Sources
↑ Robert Charles Anderson, The Great Migration, Immigrants to New England, 1634-1635, Volume IV, I-L (Boston: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2005), 25-28 (John Jackson); digital images by subscription, AmericanAncestors.
↑ Ancestry.com, The New England Historical & Genealogical Register, 1847-2011 (Provo, UT, USA, Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2011), Ancestry.com, Record for Hannah Jackson.
↑ Ancestry.com, Massachusetts, Town and Vital Records, 1620-1988 (Provo, UT, USA, Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2011), Ancestry.com, Record for William Averill.
↑ Dodd, Jordan, Liahona Research, comp, Massachusetts, Marriages, 1633-1850 (Provo, UT, USA, Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2005), Ancestry.com, Record for William Averill.
↑ Ancestry.com, Massachusetts, Wills and Probate Records, 1635-1991 (Provo, UT, USA, Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2015), Ancestry.com, Probate Records 1638-1691; Author: Massachusetts. Probate Court (Essex County); Probate Place: Essex, Massachusetts. Record for William Averell.
The Averell-Averill-Avery family : a record of the descendants of William and Abigail Averell of Ipswich, Massachusetts by Clara Avery, p. 96
See also:
"Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001," database with images, FamilySearch ([1] : 19 May 2022), William Averill and Hanah Jackson, 31 Jul 1661; citing Marriage, Ipswich, Essex, Massachusetts, United States, Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth, Boston; FHL microfilm 007009706.
Is Hannah your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Hannah by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Hannah:
I'm commenting in the hope of learning the detailed source information supporting Hannah's birth as "1636." (Currently, there is a generic link to an Ancestry.com reference to a Register article appearing in more than 150 years of publications.)
In 2005, Robert Charles Anderson placed Hannah's birth as "say 1641." See Robert Charles Anderson, The Great Migration, Immigrants to New England, 1634-1635, Volume IV, I-L (Boston: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2005), 25-28 (John Jackson), at 26; digital images by subscription, AmericanAncestors.
Thanks for your work on this profile. Due to other commitments i.e. children and work mostly, I have had very little time for WikiTree the last few years. Please feel free to update and add your contributions freely.
I'm commenting in the hope of learning the detailed source information supporting Hannah's birth as "1636." (Currently, there is a generic link to an Ancestry.com reference to a Register article appearing in more than 150 years of publications.)
In 2005, Robert Charles Anderson placed Hannah's birth as "say 1641." See Robert Charles Anderson, The Great Migration, Immigrants to New England, 1634-1635, Volume IV, I-L (Boston: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2005), 25-28 (John Jackson), at 26; digital images by subscription, AmericanAncestors.
The "say 1641" date is given for her birth in the child list of her father, John Jackson (abt.1614-bef.1648).
Thank you for any support you are able to provide. --Gene
edited by GeneJ X
Thanks for your work on this profile. Due to other commitments i.e. children and work mostly, I have had very little time for WikiTree the last few years. Please feel free to update and add your contributions freely.
Your efforts are very much appreciated!
Liz
Thank you. Note - same spouse and same parents - see bios.
Thank you.