"Jagger, Han[n]ah, d. Jonathan & Rebeckah, b. Aug. 12, 1701" [1]
"Hannah, m. Thomas Newman, June 20, 1723, by Rev. Mr. Davenport" [2]
Hannah Newman, widow of Thomas Newman married Joseph Bishop (abt.1702-abt.1752) February 6, 1746/7 at Stamford, Connecticut.[3]. She was a daughter of John Jagger and widow of Thomas Newman.[4]
↑Connecticut: Vital Records (The Barbour Collection), 1630-1870 (Online Database: AmericanAncestors.org, New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2011.) From original typescripts, Lucius Barnes Barbour Collection, 1928. Reference Stamford volume, page 138 via $American Ancestors
↑ Jeanne Majdalany, The Early Settlement of Stamford, Connecticut 1641-1700, published 2008, reference page 150, citing The Ancestry of Elizabeth Barrett Gillespie... by Paul Prindle. In the personal collection of S (Hill) Willson
The Barbour Collection of Connecticut Town Vital Records (NEHGS, Boston, 2011) Vol. Stamford, Page 140: Marriage record.
FSFTID: LCZS-BTS.
Is Hannah your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Hannah by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Hannah:
Please see my comment on the profile of Joseph Bishop (abt.1702-abt.1752). This Hannah, as Thomas Newman's widow, married Joseph Bishop in 1747 after Thomas' death.
I have ti question this merger. There's almost a generation separating the birthdates and with no parents or children, this could be another - similar Newman-Jagger couple.
Too bad there's no manager to defend their work.