no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Hannah (Jagger) Newman (1701)

Hannah Newman formerly Jagger aka Bishop
Born in Stamford, Fairfield, Connecticut Colonymap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married 20 Jun 1723 in Stamford, Fairfield, Connecticut Colonymap
Wife of — married 6 Feb 1747 in Stamford, Fairfield, Connecticut Colonymap
Descendants descendants
Died [date unknown] [location unknown]
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Al Jones private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 31 Aug 2011
This page has been accessed 473 times.

Contents

Biography

  • "Jagger, Han[n]ah, d. Jonathan & Rebeckah, b. Aug. 12, 1701" [1]
  • "Hannah, m. Thomas Newman, June 20, 1723, by Rev. Mr. Davenport" [2]
  • Hannah Newman, widow of Thomas Newman married Joseph Bishop (abt.1702-abt.1752) February 6, 1746/7 at Stamford, Connecticut.[3]. She was a daughter of John Jagger and widow of Thomas Newman.[4]

Name

Hannah Jagger

Birth

12 AUG 1701 Stamford, Fairfield, Connecticut

Marriage

20 JUN 1723 Stamford, Fairfield, Connecticut
Husband: Thomas Newman
Child: Stephen Newman

Sources

  1. Connecticut Vital Records, Index, Vol. 1, Page 125
  2. Connecticut Vital Records, Index, Vol. 1, Page 50
  3. Connecticut: Vital Records (The Barbour Collection), 1630-1870 (Online Database: AmericanAncestors.org, New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2011.) From original typescripts, Lucius Barnes Barbour Collection, 1928. Reference Stamford volume, page 138 via $American Ancestors
  4. Jeanne Majdalany, The Early Settlement of Stamford, Connecticut 1641-1700, published 2008, reference page 150, citing The Ancestry of Elizabeth Barrett Gillespie... by Paul Prindle. In the personal collection of S (Hill) Willson




Is Hannah your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Hannah by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Hannah:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 4

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Please see my comment on the profile of Joseph Bishop (abt.1702-abt.1752). This Hannah, as Thomas Newman's widow, married Joseph Bishop in 1747 after Thomas' death.
posted by S (Hill) Willson
I have ti question this merger. There's almost a generation separating the birthdates and with no parents or children, this could be another - similar Newman-Jagger couple.

Too bad there's no manager to defend their work.

posted by Al Jones
Jagger-103 and Jagger-11 appear to represent the same person because: both are shown as wife of Thomas. I found no record of a Harriet Jagger.
posted by Jennifer Lapham
Extensive research indicates there is no match with Jagger-178. Ancestry trees giving 178 the same parents as this Hannah are spurious and unsourced
posted by Eddie King

J  >  Jagger  |  N  >  Newman  >  Hannah (Jagger) Newman