Kay (Johnson) Wilson
Privacy Level: Private with Public Biography and Family Tree (Yellow)

Kay (Johnson) Wilson

Honor Code Signatory
Signed 28 Apr 2013 | 86728 contributions | 9249 thank-yous
Communication Preferences: I am interested in communicating private message with cousins and anyone else with an interest in genealogy. Here is my family tree. Ancestors ancestors
Kay A. Wilson formerly Johnson
Born 1940s.
Ancestors ancestors Descendants descendants
Mother of and [private daughter (1970s - unknown)]
Profile manager: Kay Wilson private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 28 Apr 2013 | Last significant change: 3 May 2021
03:50: David Hughey Ph.D. answered a question about Kay (Johnson) Wilson [Thank David for this | 1 thank-you received]
This page has been accessed 24,891 times.
Kay (Johnson) Wilson is a descendant of Mayflower Passenger Richard Warren.
RootsTech Attendee: 2018



Katherine Ann Johnson, the daughter of Douglas Johnson and Phyllis Smith, was born September 27, 1943 in Schenectady, New York.


Paternal and maternal relationships are confirmed with a GEDmatch test match between Kay (Johnson) Wilson GEDmatch T596586 and her sister Lynn (Johnson) Andrews GEDmatch T408316. Their most MRCAs are their parents Douglas Johnson and Phyllis Smith. Estimated number of generations to MRCA = 1.2, based on sharing 2654.8 cM across 46 segments.


Kay's current to-do list.

Advance Directive

To aid WikiTree in the administration of my account should I be incapacitated, or in the event of my death, I hereby give permission for all private profiles I'm managing to be transferred to Lara Stone whether or not she is currently on the Trusted Lists.

More Genealogy Tools

Only the Trusted List can access the following:
  • Kay's formal name
  • full middle name (A.)
  • nicknames
  • e-mail address
  • exact birthdate
  • birth location
  • images (18)
  • private siblings' names
  • private children's names (2)
  • spouse's name and marriage information
For access to Kay Wilson's full information you must be on Kay's Trusted List. Please login. See the Contact section of the Tree & Tools page.

Sponsored Search

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships by comparing test results with Kay or other carriers of her ancestors' mitochondrial DNA. Mitochondrial DNA test-takers in the direct maternal line:
  • Kay (Johnson) Wilson: Family Tree DNA mtDNA Test Full Sequence, haplogroup H10e, FTDNA kit #95490
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Kay:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.

Comments: 545

Leave a message for others who see this profile. If you prefer to keep it private, send a private message to the profile manager. private message
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Hi Kay,

Since you have been so strict with my profiles ;-)..............I see that you have your parents marked as DNA-confirmed based on a match with your sister. This match only confirms that you share the same parents but not necessarily both these parents. Your parents can only be marked as confirmed based on a test match between you/your sister and your parents. However, I do see you have more confirmations higher up in the tree. I like to advise you to copy them to the child's profile because they do confirm the DNA trail. I have many examples were the father did not supply the DNA. Had to tell my father and uncle a few years ago that their stepfather was their biological one. Them being 100% brothers, did not confirm the official father.

posted by Remko Stift
edited by Remko Stift
Hi Kay, You corrected the DNA match information on my ancestors recently. You changed maternal to paternal and maternal. The match was from a MT test. Does that confirm the paternal ancestry as well? Beth
posted by Beth (Jones) Gay
Hi Beth, Are you talking about the change I made on the profile of Amanda Jane Canterbury-456? You're correct, that if the match is from an mtDNA test, only the maternal relationship can be confirmed. But the DNA confirmation statement on her profile refers to a match on GEDmatch between you and your 3rd cousin. GEDmatch can only be used with autosomal DNA, but not mtDNA. Amanda Jane's parents are the MRCAs for your match with your cousin, and it is appropriate to mark her relationship to both of them 'confirmed with DNA'. If you still have questions, please let me know.
posted by Kay (Johnson) Wilson
Vielen Dank Kay für die Arbeit zu meiner Unordnung. Ich hoffe Du achtest weiter auf meine Eintragungen.

Gruß Utz

posted by Utz Bohlmann
Kay - I don't know how to merge these two. Maybe you can give me a pearl of wisdom! David Davis
posted by William Davis
David, It looks like you were able to figure it out.
posted by Kay (Johnson) Wilson
Thanks for the updates on the DNA confirmations. I started that work a while ago and forgot to go back with the revised guidelines concerning third cousins versus third cousins once removed. I've been making headway on DNA Painter and Chromosome mapping for Triangulation confirmations.
posted by Stormy Faw
Thanks for the merge proposal, Kay. I knew some work needed to be done with Philippa, and you reminded me to do it!
posted by L Sauls
Hello Kay!

Thank you for helping me merge my grandfather's profile. As time goes by and the more I visit where he lived with my newly married grandmother, I feel so much closer and really have a need for the file to reflect my love of him.

posted by Anne Langley
Thanks Kay for the merge proposal of Martha Barnes.

It appears we are 8th cousins twice removed thru: https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Barnes-775 I checked GEDMatch and found that you match my Dad with about 7.3cM on Chromosome 18 and lesser amounts on 5 other Chromosomes. My father also matches at a very low level with Waugh Smith GEDmatch, who is listed on Barnes-775.

posted by Andrew Ross
Many thanks Kay! Hope I did it correctly. Cheers, Lynne
posted by Lynne Date
Thanks for your merger suggestions. When I was entering my ancestors some of them did pop up and I accepted them. I didn’t realize there was another method. Thank you.
posted by Terry Neal
Terry, When the profiles "did pop up" I'm afraid you mis-read the instructions. The box you checked indicated that the profile was NOT a match, and by checking that box you rejected the match and created a new profile.
posted by Kay (Johnson) Wilson
Hello Cousin. Edward Griswold is my 9th Great-Grandfather. I Wanted to Thank You for All the Work You've Done one This branch of Our Family Tree. I am Always Delighted to Find New Cousins.

Wishing You a Blessed Day.


Thanks from this newbie getting started on electronic genealogy entries, for editing one of my precious entries, my grandmother's. It's the most mysterious one and I appreciate getting it right.
posted by Laura (Filbert) Zacher
Thank you for your help with my tree. I am learning slowly but surely. I do not have very much time to work on my tree just a few minutes here and there. I appreciate any and all suggestions and tips. I will be adding some more of what you suggested just as quickly as I can.
posted by Wayne Stone
Hi Wayne, That's great that you've found the time to add profiles for more of your ancestors! I strongly encourage you to enter birth and death locations when you create a profile. If you don't know the exact city, a county, or even the name of the state can be extremely helpful. Let me know if I can help. Thanks!
posted by Kay (Johnson) Wilson

I did my approval for the Brazelton and Shepherd merges.


posted by George Fulton
Kay, you understandably posted a comment on many of my profiles a statment sayin I needed to add a statement explaining how DNA was used. I am trying to correct those. But I do not understand what is wrong with the one on https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Little-3775/

Please clarify.

Jane, Your DNA confirmation statement on the profile for Meryle Little looks fine. It was added after I left the comment. Thank you for adding it! I've removed my comment.
posted by Kay (Johnson) Wilson
Thanks for the comment in the DNA. Sorry about the miss I'll get the other one removed this weekend and rework it when I have time and headspace to focus on DNA. Out if curiosity is there a tool In the works or exists in wikitree where you can put the info in of the three matches to confirm they count for seperate enough lines ? Keats thought it would be neat then it could auto fill in the confirmed as appropriate..
posted by Kristina Wheeler
Before you use triangulation for DNA confirmation, if two people are 3C or closer and share a MRCA, just use the regular method of DNA confirmation, using those two tests. If the relationship is >3C, then you need to look for one more distant cousin match to the same MRCA who shares the same >7.0 cM segment on the same chromosome. If you're using GEDmatch, compare the three GEDmatch IDs, using the 3D Chromosome Browser tool. At the very top of the resulting page, there's an indication of how much DNA the test takers share with one another. At the bottom of the page you can find the shared segment data, by chromosome. It doesn't auto fill the DNA confirmation statement, but provides all the information you need to write the statement yourself. If all three of the test takers don't have visible profiles on WikiTree, it's a good idea to name the MRCAs of the three, and how they're related.
posted by Kay (Johnson) Wilson
does it really matter about du[licates?
Yes, Elizabeth, it really does matter about duplicates. Please re-read the Honor Code that you signed on 23 April 2020: https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Special:Honor_Code The first item says we collaborate. Click on the link to "same ancestor profiles" which takes you to this page https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Help:Collaboration and look at item #2: Collaboration means "one profile for every individual". "Every person who ever lived should have one and only one profile on WikiTree. If a duplicate profile has been created unintentionally we merge them."
posted by Kay (Johnson) Wilson
I am amazed. How do you find these duplicates?
posted by Alan Christiansen
Thank you, I never would have found this. What a wonderful collaboration Wikitree is.
posted by Alan Christiansen
Thanks so much for the recent corrections you've made to my Beall, Brayton, Green and Odell profiles! Are you related to these families or being an incredible data doctor? Either way, I'm most appreciative.
posted by Beth (Brown) Golden
Hi Beth,

I'm not related. Just trying to be helpful.

posted by Kay (Johnson) Wilson
Thank you for your changes to Nathaniel Coleman. Much appreciated.
posted by Michael Howe Sr
Hi Kay, You are already on the trusted list for John Strickland-125 click on the privacy tab, scroll down to see the full list includes you.
posted by Sheila x
Thanks, Sheila. Tom Kelly just added me last night.
posted by Kay (Johnson) Wilson
Can you explain to me why "References" are being moved under "Sources"? References are not sources. They are footnotes. It clutters up the sources and makes reading very awkward if not down right difficult, especially when there are a lot of references. When I first joined seven years ago they were classed correctly. The reason I ask is every time any one of the team leaders or group leaders edits one of the profiles on my watch list they always move the references up to the first thing under sources. It seems to be a formatting rule. Until a year or so ago there was always a "= Footnotes =" section.
posted by Dave McNally
Hi Dave,

It's the standard now. See this page: https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Help:Biographies

posted by Kay (Johnson) Wilson
Thanks for the edit on some of my pages. I’ve been doing a lot of adopting of pages. It’s to bad though, it would have been someone who was related to me.
posted by Alice (Galligan) Glassen
edited by Alice (Galligan) Glassen
You're welcome, Alice.

I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean by "It's too bad though". What is too bad?

posted by Kay (Johnson) Wilson
Kay, Thanks for your help...I am having problems trying to get Ellen Florida Wilder Whitlock to show on her husband's family tree page...I suppose I need to move her family to the same page, but I have the Whitlocks and the Wilders on separate pages, and Florida's profile is a Wilder +#, and not a Whitlock. Is there any to fix this? I'd just as soon delete pages, and start over. Kathy Wingate
posted by Kathy Wingate
I merged George Randolph Joseph Maule (Maule-273) and Joseph Randolph Anthony Maule (Maule-264) as you suggested, but I have no idea what it should really look like. If you do, please clean it up.
posted by Chris Garrigues
Hi Chris, Thanks for completing the merge. I can't clean it up for you because of the privacy level on the profile (private with public biography). I can see that when you completed the merge you kept everything from each of the two profiles, so that half of everything in the biography should be removed just because it's duplicate information. What is in the biography is from a gedcom you imported in 2017. It would probably be a good idea for you to re-write it in a more user-friendly format. Unfortunately gedcom imports don't create very readable biographies.
posted by Kay (Johnson) Wilson
LOL -- I give up and will merge the two John Lloyd Howell ... decided that my dec'd cousin William Cozby (former Mayor in Coppell, TX) may have been confused or that I confused what he said .... so now there is only one John Lloyd Howell
posted by Susan Smith
Thanks Kay for fixing Rebecca Wells Turley and... I forget who else, but thanks! Sadly, it's just a reminder of how much work I have yet to do on my profiles (sigh).
posted by Gregory Morris

J  >  Johnson  |  W  >  Wilson  >  Kay (Johnson) Wilson

Categories: Mayflower Descendants on WikiTree | Smith Researchers