Place: Also married in Rockbridge County, VA in 1789/Stokes County, North Carolina, USA[5][6]
Sources
↑ Keim-259 was created by Bob Ervin through the import of Ervin Family Tree_VestAncestors.ged on Jun 10, 2014. This comment and citation can be deleted after the biography has been edited and primary sources are included.
↑ Source: #S39 Page: Source number: 21359.001; Source type: Family group sheet, FGSE,listed as parents; Number of Pages: 1; Submitter Code: . Data: Text: Birth date: 1763 CONT Birth place: NY CONT Marriage date: 1789 CONT Marriage place: VA
↑ Source: #S46 Page: Data Source: County Court Records Danbury, NC and FHL # 0422159. Data: Text: Marriage date: 17 Apr 1794 CONT Marriage place: Stokes, North Carolina
↑ Source: #S39 Page: Source number: 21359.001; Source type: Family group sheet, FGSE,listed as parents; Number of Pages: 1; Submitter Code: . Data: Text: Birth date: 1763 CONT Birth place: NY CONT Marriage date: 1789 CONT Marriage place: VA
↑ Source: #S46 Page: Data Source: County Court Records Danbury, NC and FHL # 0422159. Data: Text: Marriage date: 17 Apr 1794 CONT Marriage place: Stokes, North Carolina
Source: S33 Author: Ancestry.com Title: Public Member Trees Publication: Name: Name: Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: The Generations Network,Inc., 2006.Original data - Family trees submitted by Ancestry members.Original data: Family trees submitted by Ancestry members.;; Repository: #R1 NOTEThis information comes from 1 or more individual Ancestry Family Tree files. This source citation points you to a current version of those files. Note: The owners of these tree files may have removed or changed information since this source citation was created.
Is Mary your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Mary by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Mary: