Sarah Keyes was born in 1656. She was the daughter of Solomon Keyes and Frances Grant. Sarah married Samuel Foster. She died 27 Jan 1717/18 at Chelmsford at age 62.[1]
Savage says :
Solomon Keyes of Newbury son of Robert Keyes Watertown, married 2 Oct. 1653, Frances Grant, had Hannah, b. 12 Sept. 1654; Sarah, 24 Aug. 1656; Mary, 26 Sept. 1658; Jane, 20 Oct. 1650; and Judith, 16 Sept. 1662; removed to Chelmsford, there he had Solomon, baptized 25 June 1665; and was tythingman 1679.
Note: Have little info on Robert Keyes of Watertown; James Keyes of Marlborough may be the son of Robert Keyes.
↑ Vital Records from The NEHGS Register. Online database. AmericanAncestors.org. New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2014. (Compiled from articles originally published in The New England Historical and Genealogical Register.) Volume: 51, Page(s): 447 Chelmsford Marriages, 1677 to 1692
↑ "Torrey’s New England Marriages Prior to 1700". (Online database. AmericanAncestors.org. New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2008.) Originally published as: New England Marriages Prior to 1700. Boston, Mass.: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2015. Volume 1, Page 568.
Find a Grave, database and images (https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/36289370/sarah-foster: accessed March 20, 2024), memorial page for Sarah Keyes Foster (24 Aug 1656–27 Jan 1718), Find A Grave: Memorial #36289370, citing Forefathers Burial Ground, Chelmsford, Middlesex County, Massachusetts, USA; Maintained by Diana L. Brace (contributor 46885260).
Source: S281 Pitman, H. Minot. Comstock-Thomas ancestry of Richard Wilmot Comstock. Bronxville, N.Y., 1964. (Online publication - Provo, UT: The Generations Network, Inc., 2005.) http://www.Ancestry.com.
Is Sarah your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Sarah by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Sarah: