The surviving marriage records for John Nash do not record his wife's surname, she is listed only as Mary -------- with an approximate marriage date and a full date of death.
There are two Kingman sons of Henry having children in the Massachusetts Bay area in the 1670s but neither of them have a recorded daughter called Mary.
On the basis of the current evidence Mary needs to be listed as "Unknown" - unless someone has a source to support the assertion of her LNAB being Kingman.
Sources
↑ U.S. and International Marriage Records, 1560-1900, ancestry.com
Source: S48 George Walter Chamberlain, compiler, History of Weymouth Massachusetts, 4 volumes (Boston, Mass.: Weymouth Historical Society, 1923), . tts</i>. 4 volumes. Boston, Mass.: Weymouth Historical Society, 1923. TID 18 Author George Walter Chamberlain Role compiler Title History of Weymouth Massachusetts SubTitle Volumes 4 volumes PubPlace Boston, Mass. Publisher Weymouth Historical Society PubDate 1923
WikiTree profile Nash-668 created through the import of oldweymouth families072011.GED on Jul 5, 2011 by Alyson X.
Is Mary your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Mary by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Mary:
The surviving marriage records for John Nash do not record his wife's surname, she is listed only as Mary -------- with an approximate marriage date and a full date of death.
There is also no listing that I can find of a Mary Kingman being born in the area in the right timeframe. There are two Kingman sons of Henry having children in the Massachusetts Bay area in the 1670s but neither of them have a recorded daughter called Mary.
On the basis of the current evidence Mary needs to be listed as "Unknown" - unless someone has a source to support the assertion of her LNAB being Kingman.
There is also no listing that I can find of a Mary Kingman being born in the area in the right timeframe. There are two Kingman sons of Henry having children in the Massachusetts Bay area in the 1670s but neither of them have a recorded daughter called Mary.
On the basis of the current evidence Mary needs to be listed as "Unknown" - unless someone has a source to support the assertion of her LNAB being Kingman.