"United States Census, 1920," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MVSB-1FK : accessed 27 January 2020), Ruth E Kingsley in household of Arthur B Kingsley, Fort Edward, Washington, New York, United States; citing ED 209, sheet 4B, line 56, family 103, NARA microfilm publication T625 (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, 1992), roll 1272; FHL microfilm 1,821,272.
"United States Census, 1930," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:X4L1-JGW : accessed 27 January 2020), Ruth E Kingsley in household of Arthur B Kingsley, Greenwich, Washington, New York, United States; citing enumeration district (ED) ED 24, sheet 3A, line 2, family 59, NARA microfilm publication T626 (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, 2002), roll 1657; FHL microfilm 2,341,391.
Is Ruth your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Ruth by comparing test results with other carriers of her ancestors' mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Ruth: