Moses Knapp
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Moses Knapp (1709 - 1787)

Moses Knapp
Born in Stamford, Fairfield, Connecticut Colonymap
Ancestors ancestors
Husband of — married 25 Nov 1731 (to before 17 Jul 1751) in Connecticutmap
Husband of — married 12 May 1767 [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died at age 77 in Litchfield, Connecticut, United Statesmap
Profile last modified | Created 29 Apr 2013
This page has been accessed 1,173 times.

Biography

Moses Knapp, son of John Knapp and Hannah (Ferris) Knapp, was born on 6 August 1709 at Stamford, Fairfield County, Connecticut.[1][2]

Moses married on November 25, 1731 at Stamford, to Jemima Mead, daughter of Ebenezer Mead and Sarah Knapp, granddaughter of John Mead.[1] The couple were married by Joshua Knapp, J.P.[3][4] [2]

Children of Moses and Jemima:[1]

  1. Jemima Knapp, born Jan. 9, 1732-3; m David Waterbury
  2. Ebenezer Knapp, born Aug. 4, 1734
  3. Moses Knapp, born June 5, 1736; m Rachel Weed, "Alias Buxton," May 12, 1767
  4. Abraham Knapp, born Dec. 28, 1737
  5. Tamson Knapp, born July 28, 1739
  6. Jabez Knapp, born June 24, 1741
  7. Phebe Knapp, born June, 19, 1743
  8. Sarah Knapp, born Aug. 2, 1745
  9. Jane Knapp, born Mar. 3, 1747-8
  10. Isaac Knapp, born Apr. 14, 1750.

He married Rachel Weed Buxton on 12 May 1767.[2]

Moses died on July 17, 1751 at Litchfield, Litchfield County, Connecticut.[2]

Sources

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Huntington, Elijah B. compiler, (April 6, 1797) [Registration of Births, Marriages and Deaths of Stamford Families. Barbara Kaye, manager, CTGenWeb accessed 13 June 2016.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Nicholas Knapp genealogy. by Knapp, Alfred Averill. 1953. Page 32.
  3. Barbour Index for Stamford Families (1641-1853). Families Beginning with "L" and "M" CTGenWeb accessed 13 June 2016 Barbara Kaye, manager.
  4. Mead, Spencer P., 1901 "History and Genealogy of the Mead Family of Fairfield ..." New York: Knickerbocker, Archive.org accessed 13 June 2016 Pages 298-99.

See also:





Is Moses your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Moses by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree: It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Moses:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 17

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
I'm going to suggest that there are at least two people conflated into these two profiles. Each profile references the other as another child in the families.

I have a similar situation with two gents in my one-name study. I've gone back to the beginning on each of them and cannot determine in most cases what events 'belong' to which person. There are so many possible situations here, a nephew living with the family - both names Moses, a set of twins with different middle names. Children were moved from family to family, normally related but not always so and I'm sure most of us have found an unknown child living with our families. The reason for this diatribe is that I think we need to do either of two things: 1) Someone needs to take this mess and straighten it out ... hopefully in a manner that we all can agree on. 2) Decide that given the information available, we can't deconflate (is that a word?) them. 3) Determine what information is unique to which individual with sufficient supporting information. Then note for each of them what information MAY relate to them but can't be satisfactorily determined.

posted by Al Jones
Knapp-5989 and Knapp-1089 appear to represent the same person because: Other than the death date, the information is the same on these two individuals.

Furthermore, Knapp-1089 shows the death date as 17 Jul 1751, sourcing Nicholas Knapp genealogy, Page 32 but in review of the source, the death date is listed as 9 Jun 1787, matching the death date listed in Knapp-5989.

Nope! There are, in this generation 2 Moses Knapps. I've thought that very odd since I first ran into this family.

Moses Knapp 1709-1787 Moses Knapp 1709-1751 If you look at both profiles they show the other Moses ... someone with more knowledge of the family needs to take a closer look. As we get back into the 1600's things get even weirder so I think it's time to put our collective heads together and straighten this out now.

posted by Al Jones
Knapp-5989 and Knapp-1089 are not ready to be merged because: There are 2 generations of Moses Knapp. It is difficult for me to read and delve into the research on this profile that is confused with each other. Any help would be appreciated (and in large print please.)
posted by Rena (Bocock) Donze
Knapp-5989 and Knapp-1089 appear to represent the same person because: Same person
Knapp-4645 and Knapp-1089 appear to represent the same person because: Same father (Dup will set for merge). Same spouse (dup will set for merge), same birth year, no sources for death year on -4645. please merge
posted by S (Hill) Willson
Knapp-2807 and Knapp-1089 are not ready to be merged because: There is too little information on Knapp-2807. Please research and update request for merge.
posted by Rena (Bocock) Donze
Too little information on Knapp-2807 to complete merge
posted by Rena (Bocock) Donze
SAR are not documents.
posted by Rena (Bocock) Donze
Knapp-2807 and Knapp-1089 are not ready to be merged because: Too little information 2807 profile.
posted by Rena (Bocock) Donze
Am putting merge in the unmerged. There is too little information on one profile. Death date is wrong. No parentage.
posted by Rena (Bocock) Donze
Knapp-2807 and Knapp-1089 appear to represent the same person because: same birth date.
posted by Jimmy M. Sisson
This SAR application lists different parents, and a diifferent death date.

Name: Moses Knapp

Birth Date: 6 Aug 1709 Birth Place: Stamford, Connecticut

Death Date: 9 Jun 1787 Death Place: Litchfield, Connecticut

SAR Membership: 80347 Role: Ancestor

Application Date: 21 Aug 1957

Father: John Knapp Mother: Hannah Ferris

Spouse: Jemima Mead

Children: Isaac Knapp Isaac born 4-14-1750 Stamford, CT on application.


_____________________________

Check your own Biography under Origin.

posted by Jimmy M. Sisson
File in Question:

Knapp-548 Knapp-1089

posted by Rena (Bocock) Donze
I just adopted the other file and removed Jemima. The two profiles are confused together and need to be researched to separate the two. Who Married Who, and which children belongs to each. Any help would be appreciated, for this is not one line that I am currently researching.
posted by Rena (Bocock) Donze
Do we know that the Moses Knapp who married Jemima Mead was the identical man who married Sarah Warner?

I wonder about the dates and places. His youngest son was born on April 14, 1750 at Stamford, and the Sarah Warner marriage was May 29, 1750 at New Milford, Litchfield.

Thanks!

posted by Cynthia (Billups) B

Unmerged matches › Moses Knapp (abt.1705-1751)
Rejected matches › Moses Knapp (1711-1751)

K  >  Knapp  >  Moses Knapp