Identified by Jones as daughter of Samuel and Magdalena Berthen bpt. Sept. 18 1700 with the name Elisabetha, sister of Anna Barbara, citing to Langenselbold chbk. (p. 497). Burgert seconds Jones on Elisabetha and the immigrant siblings (p. 134).
Jones states marriage to Sebastian Löscher evidenced by children’s sponsors (p.497). Elisabetha’s brothers sponsored Samuel, Valentin, Johann Marcus and Johann Hermann.
Sources
Jones, Henry, Palatine Families of New York (1985)
Burgert, Annette, Eighteenth Century Immigrants from Langenselbold... (1997).
WikiTree profile Kuhn-240 created through the import of Steele Family Tree.ged on Jun 7, 2011 by Jeff Steele. S
Is Elizabeth your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Elizabeth by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Elizabeth:
Kuhn-240 and Kuhn-3568 appear to represent the same person because: Previous comments on each profile have indicated that these profiles are the same person.
John, I see where you are going with this and I tend to agree with you but I am confused by my secondary sources that Have Elisabeth Kuhn Loescher and Barbara Elizabeth Loescher as half sisters. My sources told me that there was a Samuel Kuhn Jr. and a Samuel Kuhn Senior who was dead by the census of 1715. I see that your pedigree of the kuhn family has only one Samuel Kuhn so we need to resolve that before we decide that Elizabeth and Barbara Elizabeth Kuhn are the same person. If you feel confident with your version I am willing to agree with the merge. I was hoping someone would come along that would be able to clear this up. Thanks
If the Coons book (1937) is your source how far does the statement that its statements are ‘mainly theoretical’ (as Dave Rutherford has quoted) apply? That same year Knittle (1937) found Samuel in the Simmendinger “census” of 1716/17. Also, when combined with Jones’ exposition of the other, even more obscure lists, the picture seems pretty clear that there was only one Samuel at the relevant time. People were pretty willing to use ‘jr’ and ‘sr’ even when the people weren’t directly related. I am waiting to look at that Burgert book on Langenselbold to see if I can establish Hans. But in the end Jones cites to the baptism register and Coons seems to be ‘mainly theoretical’.
I am working on that. Right now I have proposed a merge of the two remaining Samuel Kuhns husband to Magdalena Berthen. I now agree that Elisabeth (Kuhn) Loescher was the child of Samuel and Magdalena and not Samuel and Elizabeth Rosenweigen. Will make that change after the Samuels merge.
John
If the Coons book (1937) is your source how far does the statement that its statements are ‘mainly theoretical’ (as Dave Rutherford has quoted) apply? That same year Knittle (1937) found Samuel in the Simmendinger “census” of 1716/17. Also, when combined with Jones’ exposition of the other, even more obscure lists, the picture seems pretty clear that there was only one Samuel at the relevant time. People were pretty willing to use ‘jr’ and ‘sr’ even when the people weren’t directly related. I am waiting to look at that Burgert book on Langenselbold to see if I can establish Hans. But in the end Jones cites to the baptism register and Coons seems to be ‘mainly theoretical’.
John