Elizabeth, b. 21 July, 1716 in Oxford, m. Andrew Phillips
William, bp. 14 Aug 1720, in Putnam near Killingly, perhaps while his mother was staying there with her daughter Hannah Covell during or after the delivery of Hannah's first child in April 1720; m. Lois Learned
Research Notes
Birth records not yet found for daughter Hannah and possible son Samuel.
Abigail, b. 19 May 1751, previously shown here as a daughter of Abiel and Hannah, was the daughter of their son Abiel Jr. and his wife Abigail, and her profile has been moved accordingly.
Sources
↑ Yates Publishing, U.S. and International Marriage Records, 1560-1900; Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: The Generations Network, Inc., 2004; highly derivative; better source sought. Source number: 1498.000; Source type: Electronic Database; Number of Pages: 1; Submitter Code: RH1.
↑ Town and City Clerks of Massachusetts. Massachusetts Vital and Town Records. Provo, UT: Holbrook Research Institute (Jay and Delene Holbrook). Roxbury Vital Records Transcripts, Roxbury Births Page 208
↑ Framingham Vital Records, p. ___: "Hannah Tailor of Marlboro and Abiel Lamb, Dec 4, 1699, in Marlboro"
↑ HUDSON, Charles, History of the town of Marlborough, Middlesex county, Massachusetts, from its first settlement in 1657 to 1861, Boston, 1862, Page 455
↑Connecticut Church Record Abstracts, Putnam, filmed typescript viewed on ancestry.com, p. 96:"William, s. Abiel & Hannah, of Oxford"
ancestry.co.uk
U.S. and International Marriage Records, 1560-1900
Is Abiel your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Abiel by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Abiel:
Lamb-320 and Lamb-5629 appear to represent the same person because: Same person by parents and most dates. It appears Lamb-5629 should be merged into Lamb-320 which has more complete and sourced information. In most primary source records I have seen the first name spelled Abiel however it does a few times appear as Abial.
Lamb-320 and Lamb-5629 appear to represent the same person because: Same person by parents and most dates. It appears Lamb-5629 should be merged into Lamb-320 which has more complete and sourced information. In most primary source records I have seen the first name spelled Abiel however it does a few times appear as Abial.