no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Roger Lane (abt. 1569 - 1603)

Roger Lane
Born about in Hereford, Herefordshire, Englandmap
Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married 1590 in Herefordshire, Englandmap
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 34 in Hereford, Herefordshire, Englandmap
Profile last modified | Created 10 Mar 2011
This page has been accessed 2,759 times.

Biography

Roger Lane (d. bef Apr 30 1603), apothecary, and his wife Beatrix.[1]

Roger Lane of Hereford identified Beatrice L. in his will, dated 1603.[2]

Sources

  1. Slagle, A. Russell (1976) Major Samuel Lane (1628-81): His Ancestry and Some American Descendants. Maryland Historical Magazine Vol. 71 No. 4 pp. 548-561
  2. Lane, Roger, Hereford. To Beatrice L., rel., 1603 , p. 154. in Index to Acts of Administration in the Prerogative Court of Canterbury 1596 - 1608 (Acts of Administration), listed in UK, Extracted Probate Records, 1269-1975 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2009.
  • The Lane Families of Muskingum County, Ohio; Irby; Dresden, Ohio; 1985; Pg's. 4-5.




Is Roger your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Roger's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 5

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Roger Lane was not a child of Alice Anne Bagot as her children are known and the dates do not work. He has been delinked from her.
posted by Paul Gierszewski
Lane-4622 and Lane-496 appear to represent the same person because: Now it appears that you have to complete the merge....
posted by Dave McNally
It's unclear where the creator of this page got the birth information. Searching the web, I haven't been able to confirm either birth date. However, the death date of 1603, wife Beatrix, and 10 children including Richard for a Roger Lane of Hereford, England appears common. I think it would be safe to merge and indicate uncertainty in the birth date.
posted by Bryant McAllister
Lane-4622 and Lane-496 are not ready to be merged because: I agree that this appears to be the same person but there is almost 40 years difference in the date of birth, enough that it could be a father, son or even a grandfather, grandson difference. The date of Lane-4622 came from a Lane history. Do you have a referenced source for the much later date of Lane-496's birth?
posted by Dave McNally
Lane-4622 and Lane-496 appear to represent the same person because: Same duplication of this family with two separate entries for Roger Lane.
posted by Bryant McAllister

L  >  Lane  >  Roger Lane