no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

John Lay III (1714 - 1792)

John Lay III
Born in Lyme, New London, Connecticutmap
Ancestors ancestors
Husband of — married 27 Jan 1736 [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died at age 77 in Lyme, New London, Connecticutmap
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Alex Elliott private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 14 Sep 2010
This page has been accessed 684 times.

Biography

John was born in 1714. He passed away in 1792.

Sources


  • Volume and Year : Volume 024 (1870) New England Historic Genealogical Society. The New England Historical and Genealogical Register. Boston: The New England Historic Genealogical Society.
  • Connecticut Town Birth Records, pre-1870 (Barbour Collection)
  • Family Data Collection - Individual Records Birth year: 1714; Birth city: Lyme; Birth state: CT
  • Book Title: Hyde Genealogy, or, The Descendants, in the Female as Well as in the Male Lines, From William Hyde
  • The New England Historical & Genealogical Register, 1847-2011




Is John your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with John by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with John:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 2

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Lay-1389 and Lay-26 appear to represent the same person because: Same DOB, DOD, spouse(s).

If John Lay (Lay-26) is a III, shouldn't his father also be named John?

Thanks

posted by Edwin Priest
Hi Vic...per the source cited, either this John Lay did not marry Hannah Lee, or his parents are incorrect.
posted by Robin Lee

Rejected matches › John Lay Jr.John Lay

L  >  Lay  >  John Lay III