no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

William Legg (1650 - 1710)

William "Willem" Legg aka Leg, Luyck
Born in Esopus, New Netherlandmap [uncertain]
Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 60 in Kingston, Ulster County, Province of New Yorkmap
Profile last modified | Created 14 Sep 2010
This page has been accessed 1,680 times.
{{{image-caption}}}
William Legg belonged to the New Netherland Community 1614-1700.
Join: New Netherland Settlers Project
Discuss: new_netherland

Biography

William Legg was born about 1650.[1] His origins are not known. In Tangled Roots and Twisted Branches, Dorothy E. Smith asserted that the family came from Scotland. He is said to be born in Kingston, New York, in 1650; if he was born there it wasn't Kingston or New York yet, but possibly could be Esopus.

William Legg married Susanna, whose last name is variously recorded as Merrit, Merritt, Marret, Maret, or Marrid. According to Smith, the first mention of William in New York records is in relation to this marriage. Susanna Meritt had been engaged to marry Thomas Matt(h)ys (Van Keuren), but she refused to marry him, and in January 1677 she was released from the commitment to marry. She married William Legg shortly after.[2][3]

Their daughter Susanna (recorded as the child of William Legg and Susanna Marret), was baptized in the Reformed Dutch Church of Kingston, New York, on 22 September 1678.[4]

Their daughter Margriet was baptized 27 January 1684 in the Reformed Dutch Church of Kingston (Ulster County), New York. The baptism record lists her parents as Willem Luyck and Susanna Marrid.[5]

Their son Samuel was baptized 25 March 1688 in the Kingston Reformed Dutch Church. The baptism record lists his parents as William Legge and Susanna Marigh.[6]

William made his will on 5 June 1710 at Kingston, New York. He left his whole estate to his wife, Susana Legg, "dureing her widowhood," but provided that if she should remarry her portion would be reduced to one-third, with the the remaining two-thirds distributed to their children. Other heirs named in the will were his sons, William Legg and John Legg; sons-in-law Jacobis De Boy, John Davenport, and Johannis Borhans; and daughter Sarah Legg.[7]

Sources

  1. Yates Publishing. U.S. and International Marriage Records, 1560-1900 (unreliable source). Record for William Legg and Susanna Marrid(?)
  2. Merritt, Douglas. Entry for Susan Merritt, New Merritt records, Rhinebeck, N.Y.: publisher unknown, 1991. Published online by Ancestry.com. Note: This page states that Susan Merritt was released from her commitment to marry Thomas Mattys on 27 January 1677.
  3. Smith, "Legg Genealogy." Note: This page states that Susannah Merritt and Thomas Matthys were released from their engagement by court action on 7 January 1677, and the same court gave Susannah permission to marry William Legg.
  4. Baptismal and marriage registers of the old Dutch church of Kingston, Ulster County, New York. p. 10, baptism #153
  5. Baptismal and Marriage Registers of the Old Dutch Church, Kingston, Ulster, New York, p. 21
  6. Baptismal and Marriage Registers of the Old Dutch Church, Kingston, Ulster, New York, p. 31
  7. Ulster County, N.Y. Probate Records, Vol. 1, pp. 80-81

Acknowledgments

  • This person was created on 14 September 2010 through the import of 124-DeCoursey.ged.
  • This person was created through the import of Jim Walker gedcom 4 Wikitree may 22 2011.ged on 24 May 2011.
  • WikiTree profile Legg-187 created through the import of davisfamilytree-1.ged on Sep 1, 2012 by Rich Davis.




Is William your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of William's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 3

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
The only "evidence" for this person (Lucus Legg, born 1624) seems to be entries in various versions of the Pedigree Resource File, as well as single entries in the Ancestral File, One World Tree, and International Genealogical Index. Most of these give a birth date of 1624, but one entry had a birth date of 1629. The book Tangled Roots and Twisted Branches that is cited for later people named Legg doesn't so much as speculate on the name of the father of William Legg (although I found the book cited on Ancestry.com as a source for Lucus Leg, quoting the passage about William Legg, which does not mention this name and does not speculate on William's father).
posted on Leg-3 (merged) by Ellen Smith
edited by Ellen Smith
Legg-58 and Legg-24 appear to represent the same person because: Same person. Legg and Leg are the names I keep finding on records, and Legg is by far the preferred spelling. Some internet sources say he was from Scotland, which would mean we don't need to look for a patronymic. Legg-24 is the lowest-numbered profile for that LNAB. No parent conflicts.
posted by Ellen Smith
Legg-187 and Legg-24 appear to represent the same person because: Same person. Legg and Leg are the names I keep finding on records, and Legg is by far the preferred spelling. Some internet sources say he was from Scotland, which would mean we don't need to look for a patronymic. Legg-24 is the lowest-numbered profile for that LNAB. No parent conflicts.
posted by Ellen Smith