Is Hannah your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Hannah by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Hannah:
Lester-1492 and Lester-688 appear to represent the same person because: Hannah Lester married first to Skaggs and second to Whitt. CLN should be Whitt', with Skaggs as Other Last Name. Otherwise name, dates, and locations are consistent.
Duplicate profiles for her father should be merged first.
Hi Bill.The following is a message I posted on the referenced profiles but concerns Lester-688 so I am copying you. Hope you are well. Bob
Arthur-1551 looks to be same. same husband, but the child Hannah Lester is married to Mr. Whitt on one profile and Mr. Skaggs on the other profile. So maybe look into it before confirming a merge?
This appears to be the same woman who had children with Jeremiah Skaggs before 1800 and with Edmund Whitt beginning in 1803. Hannah Whitt, age 77 is found as an apparent widow in the 1850 Census of Carter County, Kentucky.
Duplicate profiles for her father should be merged first.
edited by Bill Vincent Ph.D.
Arthur-1551 looks to be same. same husband, but the child Hannah Lester is married to Mr. Whitt on one profile and Mr. Skaggs on the other profile. So maybe look into it before confirming a merge?