Edmund was born 16 December 1707 at Watertown, Massachusetts Bay Colony.[1] He married Rebecca Benjamin on 29 January 1733 at Watertown. [2] He passed away 30 Jun 1750 at Sturbridge, Massachusetts Bay Colony.[3]
Probate
Edmund Livermore of Sturbridge, tailor died intestate and on 11 July 1750, his widow Rebecca was granted the administration of his estate.[4]
His inventory was taken on 13 August 1750 in Sturbridge.[5]
Sources
↑ "Massachusetts Births and Christenings, 1639-1915 database, FamilySearch [1] : 15 January 2020, Edmond Livermore, 1707.
↑ ""Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001," database with images, FamilySearch [2] : 11 May 2022, Edmund Livermore and Rebecca Benjamin, 29 Jan 1733; citing Marriage, Watertown, Middlesex, Massachusetts Bay Colony, British Colonial America, Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth, Boston; FHL microfilm 007011107.
↑ "Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001," database with images, FamilySearch [3] : 20 May 2022, Edmond Livemore, 30 Jun 1750; citing Death, Sturbridge, Worcester, Massachusetts Bay Colony, British Colonial America, Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth, Boston; FHL microfilm 007011132.
↑ "Probate records v. 3 1748-1751, 1793-1837, 1865-1898" database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-C9YY-F38B-6 : 27 March 2024), Film# 007704428, Worcester, Massachusetts, image 179, Vol 3, Page 338-339.
Is Edmund your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Edmund by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Edmund:
Livermore-382 and Livermore-27 appear to represent the same person because: Matching birth and death data. Marriage dates are exactly one year different -- this looks like a "double date" situation where the same record was interpreted differently by different people. Please merge.
Note: There's a third profile for his man that is also being proposed for merging.
There's a third profile for this person that is also proposed for merging.
Note: There's a third profile for his man that is also being proposed for merging.