no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

John Logan (1674 - 1757)

John Logan aka Loggan [uncertain]
Born in Ayr, Ayrshire, Scotlandmap [uncertain]
Ancestors ancestors
Son of [uncertain] and [uncertain]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married about 1698 in Scotland or Ulster, Irelandmap
Descendants descendants
Died at age 82 in Atrim, Ulster, Irelandmap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Vick Miles private message [send private message] and Billy McDonald private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 10 Mar 2013
This page has been accessed 6,164 times.

Contents

Biography

John Logan

Note

Not documented that this couple of Ayr, Scotland are parents of the immigrant Logans John, David, William and James Logan who came to America and settled in VA. This couple did have sons of same names born at the right time to be these immigrant brothers, but no documentation that the Logan brothers of Ayr left for either Ireland or America. Also the association of this John Logan of Ayr as son of James Logan is a matter of debate between Logan researchers. John and Agnes of Ayr had 13 children, 6 of whom died early. The remaining sons were John, David, James and William and a daughter Margaret. Baptismal records are available in Ayr. --note by Barbara Baker?

Birth

ABT 1680 Ayr, Ayrshire, Scotland [1]
20 OCT 1674 Lurgan, County Armagh, Ireland
1689 of Lurgan, Co. Armagh, Ireland

Death

Death: 02 DEC 1777 Ayrshire, , Scotland Or Ulster, Ireland

Name

Name: John /Logan/[2][3][4][5][6]

Birth

Birth: 1680 Ireland[7]

Death

Death: 02 DEC 1777 Washington, Litchfield, Connecticut, United States[8]

Burial

Burial: Washington, Litchfield County, Connecticut, USA[9]

Residence

Residence:
Place: CT, United States[10]

Event

Ayr, Lanark, & Stirling: - The Commissariot Record of Glasgow Register of Testamenis, 1547-1800/[11]

Marriage

Husband: John Logan
Marriage: Stevinstoune, Ayr, Scotland[12]

Sources

  1. Scotland, Select Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950 Ancestry.com
  2. Source: #S60
  3. Source: #S57 Object: @M345@
  4. Source: #S58 Page: National Archives; Washington, D.C.; Naturalization Petitions for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, 1795-1930; Series: M1522; Roll: 40; Record Type: (Roll 040) Petitions June 5, 1798-Sept 5, 1806 Object: @M346@
  5. Source: #S59
  6. Source: #S6 Page: Ancestry Family Tree
  7. Source: #S58 Page: National Archives; Washington, D.C.; Naturalization Petitions for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, 1795-1930; Series: M1522; Roll: 40; Record Type: (Roll 040) Petitions June 5, 1798-Sept 5, 1806 Object: @M346@
  8. Source: #S60
  9. Source: #S60
  10. Source: #S57 Object: @M345@
  11. Source: #S59
  12. Source: #S59
  • Private Logan family tree Ancestry.com
  • Logan ancestry on wikipedia
  • S57 U.S. Revolutionary War Rolls, 1775-1783 Ancestry.com
  • S58 Pennsylvania, U.S. Naturalization Originals, 1795-1930 Ancestry.com
  • S59 Ayrshire, Scotland, Parish and Probate Records Ancestry.com
  • S6 Ancestry Family Trees Ancestry.com.
  • S60</span> Author: Ancestry.com Title: Web: Connecticut, Find A Grave Index, 1636-2013 Publication: Name: Ancestry.com
  • S50 Scotland, Select Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950 Ancestry.com




Is John your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with John by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree: It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with John:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 3

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Logan-652 and Logan-1421 appear to represent the same person because: Aside from the date of birth, there is no conflicting information, in fact, one profile has very little information. I suggest the merge using the date of birth that actually has a date. Hamon-137
posted by Orinda (Hamon) Spence
Logan-652 and Logan-1294 appear to represent the same person because: Same person--Notes in my version mentions the possible discrepancy in place of birth.
posted by Bob Nichol
Loggan-16 and Logan-652 appear to represent the same person because: Same parents. Alternate spelling noted in my version. Please cite source for the exact dates you have!
posted by Bob Nichol

L  >  Logan  >  John Logan

Categories: Clan Logan