no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Bromfield Long (abt. 1686 - bef. 1763)

Bromfield "Broomfield, Bloomfield" Long
Born about in Rappahannock, Virginiamap
Ancestors ancestors
Brother of
Husband of — married 1713 [location unknown]
Husband of — married after 1738 [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died before before about age 77 in Saint Georges Parish, Spotsylvania, Virginiamap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Bennie Bailey private message [send private message] and Reid Brodie private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 28 Jan 2014
This page has been accessed 1,727 times.

Contents

Biography

U.S. Southern Colonies Project logo
Bromfield Long was a Virginia colonist.

Brumfield Long was born in 1686, in Rappahannock County, Virginia. In 1713, Brumfield married Elizabeth Reynolds, a daughter of William Reynolds. On October 2, 1730, a Bond was recorded between Brumfield Long, with Elizabeth, his wife, and Thomas Turner for the transfer of 136 acres of land, 34 acres of which was a part of 84 acres of land formerly belonging to William Reynolds, father to Elizabeth (Reynolds) Long. [1]

Elizabeth and Brumfield became the parents of seven sons and an unknown number of daughters. Elizabeth (Reynolds) Long died before May 15, 1738. [2] After her death, Brumfield married a woman named Mary (?nee) and moved to newly formed St. George Parish, Spotsylvania County, Virginia, where he wrote his Will in 1763 [3]


Land Records

Deed[4]
Dated: 1 August 1791
Recorded: 4 August 1791
Spotsylvania County, Colony of Virginia
Thomas Vaun and Sarah, his wife, of Halifax County to Patrick Donally [Donnelly] of Spotsylvania County.
Whereas, by Indenture dated 4 November 1744, Bromfield Long conveyed to his son, Reubin Long, in fee simple, 118 1/2 acres in Spotsylvania County, which said tract of land was afterwards conveyed by the said Broomfield Long to his daughters, Mary [the lower dividend] and Sarah [the upper dividend]. Now in consideration of the sum of £25 the said Thomas Vaun [who intermarried with the said Sarah, daughter of Broomfield Long] and Sarah his wife, convey to the said Donally, the tract of land in Spotsylvania County aforesaid, given to Sarah by her father, Bromfield Long
Witnesses: John Frazer, William Heslop, Reuben Straughan



Researchers Notes

There is much biographical information on Brumfield's Find A Grave memorial, some of which is suspect. Brumfield wrote his will in 1763, in St. George Parish, Spotsylvania Co, VA. His Will does not include the name of Reuben Long, and so it is thought that IF he had a son named Reuben, he had passed away by 1762. His will does not include a son named Reuben, but it is very clear from the Thomas Vaughan deed of 1791, that he did indeed have a son named Reuben.

Captain Reuben Long, born 1730, who died in 1792, in Culpeper County, is reported to have been the son of Richard Long and not Brumfield. See also: https://www.colonial-settlers-md-va.us/getperson.php?personID=I067802&tree=Tree1

Sources

  1. King George County Deed Book 1, pages 83-88
  2. https://colonial-settlers-md-va.us/getperson.php?personID=I033259&tree=Tree1
  3. https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/215649733/brumfield-long
  4. Spotsylvania County (Va.), William Armstrong Crozier, and Clayton Torrence. 1905. Spotsylvania county, 1721-1800 being transcriptions from the original files at the county court house, of wills, deeds, administrators' and guardians' bonds, marriage licenses, and lists of revolutionary pensioners. New York: Pub. for the Genealogical Association by Fox, Duffield & Co.
  • Franklin Y DNA Project research. Y DNA testing has proven Broomfield Long is the ancestor of an NPE branch of Franklin's, numerous Franklin and Long men having tested. Since testing began, documentation has been found supporting this as it indicates Lawrence Franklin took in children of his neighbors. DNA and documenation indicate that Reuben and his brother Henry were adopted by Lawrence Franklin after the death of their parents Henry Long Jr. and Ann of Essex/Spotsylvania County.




Is Bromfield your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Bromfield by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree: It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Bromfield:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 7

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
http://wvancestry.com/ReferenceMaterial/Files/The_Long_Journey_West_-_The_Long_Family_of_Old_Rappahannock_Virginia.pdf

Written by a descendant of "Brumfield Long" this dissertation has interesting accounts of his descendants, accompanied by maps and explanations of their Westward travels

posted by Janne (Shoults) Gorman
Long-6114 and Long-11657 appear to represent the same person because: Same death date.
posted on Long-11657 (merged) by Sarah Sharpless
Hi Any, thanks for your contributions to WikiTree, which are appreciated. I've noticed that this profile seems to be a potential duplicate of some other profiles already on WikiTree. Please could you add your sources, particularly for birth and death details to assist in clarifying which of the profiles are duplicates. In future, if you could check carefully before adding new profiles to WikiTree, especially pre-1700 profiles it would be really appreciated. Kind regards, Gillian
posted on Long-11657 (merged) by Gillian Thomas
Hi Bennie, please could you add your sources to this profile, particularly estimated date of birth. Also any other sourced information you have about this person. Many thanks. Gillian
posted on Long-11657 (merged) by Gillian Thomas
Long-11657 and Long-18200 are not ready to be merged because: There are a couple of other potential duplicates of these two profiles with lower LNABs, so have set as unmerged matches while sources are added to the profiles. Thanks
posted on Long-11657 (merged) by Gillian Thomas
Long-18200 and Long-11657 appear to represent the same person because: Similar birth and death details. Please could you review if these are duplicates. Thanks.
posted on Long-11657 (merged) by Gillian Thomas
Long-9638 and Long-6114 appear to represent the same person because: same DOB & DOD
posted by H Husted