no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Joseph Loomis (bef. 1682 - bef. 1748)

Capt. Joseph Loomis
Born before in Windsor, Hartford County, Connecticutmap
Ancestors ancestors
Son of and [uncertain]
Husband of — married 3 Jun 1710 in Connecticutmap
Descendants descendants
Died before at about age 65 in Connecticutmap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Marcia Benjamin private message [send private message] and Jessie Robertson private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 4 Mar 2018
This page has been accessed 322 times.

Contents

Biography

Birth

Joseph was born on 28 November 1682 in Windsor, Hartford, Connecticut Colony.[1] He was the son of Joseph Loomis and probably Hannah Marsh,[2]

Marriage

He married Mary Cooley in 1710 in Springfield, Hampden, Massachusetts.[3]

Children

  1. Mabel bapt. 6 March 1711/2 m. John Hurlburt.[4]
  2. Keziah bapt. 12 Dec. 1715 m. Zebulon King.[5]
  3. Mary bapt. 12 Jan. 1720 m. Ebenezer Read.[6]

Death and Probate

Joseph was buried on 30 May 1748 in the Connecticut Colony.[7][2]

Sources

  1. "Connecticut Births and Christenings, 1649-1906", database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:F74H-BVL : 7 January 2020), Joseph Loomis, 1682.
  2. 2.0 2.1 The descendants of Joseph Loomis, who came from Braintree, England in the year 1638, and settled in Windsor, Conn., in 1639 by Loomis, Elias, 1875. Page 33, 43.
  3. "Massachusetts, Springfield Vital Records, 1638-1887," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XPJV-D9Z : 22 February 2021), Joseph Loomis and Mary Cooly, 28 Jun 1710; citing p 141, Springfield, Hampden, Massachusetts, Springfield City Hall; FHL microfilm 185,414.
  4. "Connecticut Births and Christenings, 1649-1906", database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:F771-G4G : 7 January 2020), Mabel Loomis, 1711.
  5. "Connecticut Births and Christenings, 1649-1906", database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:F771-L89 : 7 January 2020), Keziah Loomis, 1715.
  6. "Connecticut Births and Christenings, 1649-1906", database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:F771-26P : 7 January 2020), Mary Loomis, 1720.
  7. "Connecticut Deaths and Burials, 1772-1934", database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:F7JZ-JB9 : 16 January 2020), Joseph Loomis, .




Is Joseph your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Joseph by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Joseph:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 3

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Hey Jessie! I agree they seem to represent the same person. My bad! I created the other profile clearly without realizing there was one for him already. I'm just checking some sources and will aprove the merge shortly. I hadn't added Hannah as his mother probably because I found no primary source confirming that. Joseph and Hannah were married, but I can't seem to find a burial record for her. So there's no way to know for sure if she was his mother or not. I'm going with your Loomis genealogy source for now and will add an "uncertain" if I can.

Edit: I will remove the find a grave link though. It's not a trusted source and I have an actual burial record for him. I hope that's ok with you. Thanks!

posted by Marcia (Bonnet) Benjamin
edited by Marcia (Bonnet) Benjamin
Loomis-3599 and Loomis-2330 are not ready to be merged because: They are siblings who appear to represent the same person.
posted by Liz King
Loomis-3599 and Loomis-2330 appear to represent the same person because: Appear duplicate
posted by Jessie Robertson

Rejected matches › Joseph Loomis (1651-1699)

L  >  Loomis  >  Joseph Loomis