no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Jane Ann (Lovelace) Walroth (1832 - 1922)

Jane Ann Walroth formerly Lovelace
Born in Frontenac, Ontario, Canadamap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Mother of
Died at age 89 in Frontenac, Ontario, Canadamap
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Michael Tryon private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 16 Dec 2018
This page has been accessed 80 times.

Biography

Jane was born in 1833. She was the daughter of Marshall Lovelace and Mary Althouse. She passed away in 1922.

Residence

Residence:
Date: 1911
Place: Frontenac, Ontario, Canada
Residence:
Date: 1901
Place: Portland, Addington, Ontario, Canada
Residence:
Date: 1881-1891
Place: Addington, Ontario, Canada
Residence:
Date: 1861
Place: Frontenac, Canada West, Canada
Residence:
Date: 1852
Place: Addington County, Canada West (Ontario), Canada

Sources

  • 1851 Census of Canada East, Canada West, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia for Jane Waltroth, Canada West (Ontario), Addington County, Camden East (ancestry.com)
  • 1881 Census of Canada for Jane Walroth, Ontario, Addington, Camden East (ancestry.com)
  • 1891 Census of Canada for Jane Walroth, Ontario, Addington, Portland (ancestry.com)
  • 1901 Census of Canada for Jane A Walroth, Ontario, Addington, Portland (ancestry.com)
  • 1911 Census of Canada for Jane Walrath, Ontario, Frontenac, Sub-District 45 - Portland (ancestry.com)
  • Ontario, Canada, Deaths and Deaths Overseas, 1869-1946 for Jane Ann Walroth, Frontenac, b. 16 Dec 1832, d. 8 Nov 1922, parents Marshall Lovelace and Mary Althouse, witness Jacob Walroth, son.




Is Jane your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Jane's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 4

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
I've approved the merge from the Lovelace-900 side. Lovelace should be used for LNAB since that is what is used on the other family members. Both spellings were used in records and that's very common. Birth location is "near Picton" on death certificate but I find no record of the family being there, though they definitely seemed to move around a lot. Also the boundaries of the counties moved around a lot in the early 1800s. The generic Ontario or Eastern Ontario could be used with an explanation in the bio.
posted on Loveless-242 (merged) by Michael Tryon
Lovelace-900 and Loveless-242 appear to represent the same person because: Clearly a duplicate., 3 years after Elizabeth said so. These need to be merged. The two spellings of the last name both seem to have been used by this family. Please look at her early records and see how her name was spelled, then make a decision and merge to that LNAB. Different place names should not prevent a merge, as they can be easily corrected later..If you can't tell which is correct, note the discrepancy in the text section of the profile.
posted on Loveless-242 (merged) by Ellen Smith
Lovelace-900 and Loveless-242 are not ready to be merged because: Definitely the same person. Need birth place clarified and last name at birth.
posted on Loveless-242 (merged) by Sari (Stupka) Preeper
Lovelace-900 and Loveless-242 appear to represent the same person because: Clear duplicate
posted on Loveless-242 (merged) by Elizabeth W

L  >  Lovelace  |  W  >  Walroth  >  Jane Ann (Lovelace) Walroth