Place: Addington County, Canada West (Ontario), Canada
Sources
1851 Census of Canada East, Canada West, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia for Jane Waltroth, Canada West (Ontario), Addington County, Camden East (ancestry.com)
1881 Census of Canada for Jane Walroth, Ontario, Addington, Camden East (ancestry.com)
1891 Census of Canada for Jane Walroth, Ontario, Addington, Portland (ancestry.com)
1901 Census of Canada for Jane A Walroth, Ontario, Addington, Portland (ancestry.com)
1911 Census of Canada for Jane Walrath, Ontario, Frontenac, Sub-District 45 - Portland (ancestry.com)
Ontario, Canada, Deaths and Deaths Overseas, 1869-1946 for Jane Ann Walroth, Frontenac, b. 16 Dec 1832, d. 8 Nov 1922, parents Marshall Lovelace and Mary Althouse, witness Jacob Walroth, son.
Is Jane your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
I've approved the merge from the Lovelace-900 side. Lovelace should be used for LNAB since that is what is used on the other family members. Both spellings were used in records and that's very common. Birth location is "near Picton" on death certificate but I find no record of the family being there, though they definitely seemed to move around a lot. Also the boundaries of the counties moved around a lot in the early 1800s. The generic Ontario or Eastern Ontario could be used with an explanation in the bio.
Lovelace-900 and Loveless-242 appear to represent the same person because: Clearly a duplicate., 3 years after Elizabeth said so. These need to be merged. The two spellings of the last name both seem to have been used by this family. Please look at her early records and see how her name was spelled, then make a decision and merge to that LNAB. Different place names should not prevent a merge, as they can be easily corrected later..If you can't tell which is correct, note the discrepancy in the text section of the profile.