Thomas Macy
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Thomas Macy (abt. 1608 - 1682)

Thomas Macy
Born about in Chilmark, Wiltshire, Englandmap [uncertain]
Son of [uncertain] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married about 1644 in Salisbury, Essex, Massachusetts Bay Colonymap [uncertain]
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 74 in Nantucket, Massachusetts Bay Colonymap
Profile last modified | Created 27 Mar 2011
This page has been accessed 8,747 times.
Nantucket Founders and Descendants
Thomas Macy was a founder of Nantucket.
Join: Nantucket Founders and Descendants Project
Discuss: nantucket
The Puritan Great Migration.
Thomas Macy migrated to New England during the Puritan Great Migration (1621-1640). (See The Directory, by R. C. Anderson, p. 217)
Join: Puritan Great Migration Project
Discuss: pgm

Contents

Biography

Flag of Wiltshire (adopted 2009)
Thomas Macy was born in Wiltshire, England.

Thomas Macy was born in England about 1608 (age 74 April 1682 when he died). His parents are unknown. The Great Migration Directory p 217 lists his origins as unknown although he is reputed to be of Chilmark, Wiltshire.

It is unknown exactly when Thomas immigrated. Thomas Macy, of Chilmark, Wiltshire, England was made freeman at Newbury, Mass., September 6, 1639. He was one of the founders of Salisbury, Mass. (named for the Shiretown of Wilts). His religious denomination was Baptist, and he preached occasionally. Because of religious persecution, he with nine others, purchased the island of Nantucket in Februarymac 1659, the deed being dated July 2, 1659. Nantucket at that time was under the jurisdiction of New Netherland. Thomas Macy's wife, Sarah (Hopcott) Macy, also came from Chilmark[1], and they were undoubtedly married in England. He died in Nantucket, April 19, 1682, aged seventy-four years[2], and his widow died in 1706, aged ninety-four years.[1][3]

For excellent information, see this site: Thomas Macy

  • Ancestor of noted actor William H Macy[4] through his son John.
  • Settled in the Massachusetts Bay Colony and thrived there as a merchant until 1659.
  • 12 Nov 1659 was fined 30 shillings and be admonished by the governor for allowing some Quakers to shelter in his home during a storm.
  • Purchased and moved to Nantucket, along with a group of others. They were the first European settlers on the island.
  • Eventually converted to Quaker.

Residence

Place: Chilmark, Wiltshire, England[1][3]
Place: Salisbury, Massachusetts[1]

"The Macys settled in Salisbury, Essex, Massachusetts by the end of 1640. The Macy-Colby house in nearby Amesbury, which Thomas built, still stands. The house lot was bounded, in 1654, on the West by the land of Edmund Elliott and the burying ground, called Union Cemetery since 1663, and on the East by what is now Main Street. This early home of Macy's is about one quarter of a mile below the lights at the junction of Route 110 and Main Street. Although Macy was buried on the island of Nantucket, as were some of his descendants, his name appears on the Golgotha Stone near the Powow river. Here, he was a representative in 1664, according to Savage. Austin states that he was one of those given “full powers to order all the affairs of the town” in 1643, 1647, and 1653 and served as a juryman in 1648 and deputy in 1654." [5]

Place: Nantucket, Massachusetts[1]. He (Thomas Macy) was prosecuted and fined for allowing four Friends on a journey to take shelter in his house about three quarters of an hour one rainy day, in 1659, as his own letter to the court informs us. It is worthy of note that his grandson and many others of his descendants became Friends. Like Roger Williams, he fled from persecution in Massachusetts. His family were the first white settlers in Nantucket, then under the jurisdiction of New Netherland (later known as New York). Edward Starbuck and Isaac Coleman, a lad 12 years old, accompanied them.[6]

Immigration

Circa 1635 from Chilmark, England to Salem, Massachusetts[1]

Marriage and Issue

Husband: Thomas Macy
Wife: Sarah Hopcott
Marriage Place: England[3] See Research Notes section
Date: 9th August 1639[7] See Research Notes section
  1. Sarah, born 9 July 1644 in Salisbury, Essex, Massachusetts, died in 1645 -1646 in Salisbury, Essex, Massachusetts.[7][6]
  2. Sarah (1646-1701) m. William Worth (1642-1724)[1] on 11 Apr 1665 in Nantucket, [7][6]
  3. Mary (1648-1729) m. William Bunkers (1648-1712)[1][6]
  4. Bethiah (1650-1732) m. Joseph Gardner (1652-1701)[1][6]
  5. Thomas (1653-1675)[1] [6]
  6. John(1655-1691) m. Deborah Gardner (1658-1712)[1][6]
  7. Francis, (1657-1658)[7][6]

Death

1682 April 19[6]

Per the book, Nantucket Lands and Land Owners, p. 71, his death occurred on 19 June 1682. Another book lists the date of death as 19 April 1682.

Administration on his estate was granted on 1 August 1682 to his son John. The estate was valued at £71, of which about 1/2 was land and the rest cattle. Claims against it were established so that it was insolvent. [8]

Research Notes

Marriage: A marriage date for Thomas Macy and Sarah Hopcott has been given as August 9, 1639, at England, without sources.[7] To date, no evidence has been found of their marriage there. Furthermore, it is doubtful that he married in August 1639 in England, as he was made freeman in Newbury, Massachusetts less than a month later, on September 6, 1639. Another reference, the site The Macy-Colby House says, without sources, that Thomas and Sarah married in 1643, and that Sarah had arrived in Salem in 1640.[1]

Great Migration Directory: Macy, Thomas: Unknown; 1639; Newbury, Salisbury, Amesbury, Nantucket [NeTR 37; MBCR 1:376; SyTR 3; EPR 1:23; Hoyt 236-37; TAG 30:158; Silvanus J. Macy, Genealogy of the Macy Family from 1635-1868 (Albany, New York, 1868)].


Sources

  1. 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 1.11 The Macy-Colby House Thomas Macy. The Macy-Colby House, 257 Main Street, Amesbury, MA 01913 USA · Phone: 1-978-388-3054 Copyright © 2016 The Macy-Colby House All Rights Reserved • The Macy-Colby House is on the National Register of Historic Places. Accessed 2016 November 22 by amb
  2. Vital Records of Nantucket, Massachusetts to the year 1850, Volume 5 - Deaths, 1687-1850. Published by NEHGS Boston, MA 1928. Pg. 434 Thomas [dup. Macey], Mr., Apr. 19, 1682. [Macy, h. Sarah Hopcot, 19th, 4 mo., a. 74, PR38. Macy, 19th, 3 mo., PR63.] Note: "4 mo" comes from PR38 - private record, from the William C. Folger genealogical records in the possession (1911) of the Nantucket Historical Association. (This compilation has been used because of the valuable clues it affords, but its statements should be received with caution, as it is not free from errors. It should also be understood that in many instances the events recorded did not take place in Nantucket, and in a few cases attention has been called to the question of residence.) "3 mo" comes from PR63 -private record, from a copy of a manuscript kept by Hon. Isaac Coffin, Judge of Probate, in the possession of the Nantucket Atheneum.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Edward Norris Wentworth, Jr., The Genealogy of Edward Norris Wentworth Junior. Publication: Location: Chicago, Cook, Illinois, USA; Date: June 1928. Page: 50-51. Special Project Submitted in Courses in Community Life and Advance Biology at the University High School, University of Chicago
  4. "Puritans and Pioneers." Finding Your Roots with Henry Louis Gates, Jr. (Season 4, Episode 3). PBS. 17 Oct 2017.
  5. http://oliveandeliza.com/ennis/macy/thomasandsarah.html
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8 The old families of Salisbury and Amesbury, Massachusetts ; with some related families of Newbury, Haverhill, Ipswich and Hampton, by Hoyt, David Webster, 1833-1921. Published 1897 Accessed 2016 November 22 by amb
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 © 2004 by Michelle Boyd, All rights reserved. Thomas Macy & Sarah Hopcot. Accessed 22 November 2016 by amb
  8. Nantucket Lands and Land Owners, by Henry Barnard Worth, publ. 1901 by Nantucket Historical Association, Vol. II, Bulletin No. 1, p. 71

See also:





Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Thomas by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Thomas:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 26

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Thomas' mother was Kinburia Yokeney. I have found their - Thomas the elder's and her marriage. He was married prior to her and had issue - which I have found also - and when the first wife, Joanne Cockerill died giving birth to the last of their children, the elder Thomas married again she is the mother of this Thomas.
What source(s) tie this Thomas to the parents you’ve identified?
posted by S (Hill) Willson
It is doubtful he married in August 1639 in England, as he was made freeman in Newbury, Massachusetts September 6, 1639. Are there any reliable sources for their marriage in Chilmark Parish in 1639? I didn't find any in FindMyPast, but perhaps their names are recorded differently.

As for his immigration, Anderson in The Great Migration Directory on page 219 says that he arrived in New England in 1639, and that his origins are not known.

posted by S (Hill) Willson
I am not aware of the source for the marriage. If someone wants to check the various sources, perhaps they might locate information. It is presently marked uncertain, but perhaps we should remove the date/location and put a note regarding it in a research section...
If Thomas Macy was a Quaker, shouldn't we add the Quakers Sticker?

If Thomas Macy was a Quaker, his death would have been recorded by them in the Minutes, using the number of the month. I suggest he died 4th month 19 1682 which would be June, the fist month being March. Finding the minute would confirm.

ETA: I found a transcript at http://dunhamwilcox.net/ma/nantucketi97.htm reading, "Thomas [dup. Macey], Mr., Apr. 19, 1682. [Macy, h. Sarah Hopcot, 19th, 4 mo., a. 74, PR38. Macy, 19th, 3 mo., PR63.]"

posted by Connie Mack
edited by Connie Mack
"4 mo" comes from PR38 - private record, from the William C. Folger genealogical records in the possession (1911) of the Nantucket Historical Association. (This compilation has been used because of the valuable clues it affords, but its statements should be received with caution, as it is not free from errors. It should also be understood that in many instances the events recorded did not take place in Nantucket, and in a few cases attention has been called to the question of residence.)

"3 mo" comes from PR63 -private record, from a copy of a manuscript kept by Hon. Isaac Coffin, Judge of Probate, in the possession of the Nantucket Atheneum. I'd say the probate judge might keep more accurate records. the 3 month of 1682 was May. It would still be good to track down the Quaker records though.

ETA: I've added the birth source from the book at familysearch. The age at death was 74 so his birth year should be 1608. When in edit mode there are two errors showing connected to his birth date that need to be addressed.

posted by Connie Mack
edited by Connie Mack
Thank you, Connie!

In the future it would be great if you could get in touch with the PGM project before making any changes to project protected profiles. As you observed yourself, not all sources can be trusted and we usually analyze them before we add them to a profile. I realize the profile needs more research and cleaning up. I'm adding categories so it will be added to our to-do list.

I've also fixed the problem with the death date.

Thanks!

posted by Marcia (Bonnet) Benjamin
edited by Marcia (Bonnet) Benjamin
I didn't realize it was a problem adding an inline source. It makes no sense to have something in the bio if you don't want anything to support it being there. But, I won't add anything in the future. I'm sorry.
posted by Connie Mack
I double checked to see if I remember the project protection rules incorrectly. "The data, biography, and sources on a PPP can be edited by any member who has signed the Honor Code. If you have a non-controversial improvement to make, please make it!"
posted by Connie Mack
Hi Connie, there is also project-specific guidance with most projects. In this case the PGM Project page has a little more detail. But I think the main point is to always collaborate on any project profile when making changes to allow other members to weigh the changes on an already well-developed profile. This just allows for clear consensus on changes. I don't think the changes you made are a problem, but it does help to present intended changes before hand. As you can see from comments below, even place names can become major topics of discussion.
posted by Bobbie (Madison) Hall
It's ok Connie. Bobbie just emphasized something I wanted to point out. It's about collaboration and initiating a dialogue, which only enriches our process as a whole.
I've applied PPP to Thomas' profile, but parents were attached prior to that. I am wondering what others think about these possible parents and whether they should remain attached.

Ten years ago, I had posted online about the Thomas Macy and his wife that are now attached. See here: https://www.genealogy.com/forum/surnames/topics/macy/553/ I never received any responses.

I also had posted the will of a John Macy in Chilmark in 1575. See here: https://www.genealogy.com/forum/surnames/topics/macy/505/ If you follow the links, I also posted a transcript of the will: https://www.genealogy.com/forum/surnames/topics/macy/509/

I believe that John Macy who made his will in 1575 is likely the great-grandfather of 'our' Thomas (of Nantucket fame).

posted by Darlene (Athey) Athey-Hill
edited by Darlene (Athey) Athey-Hill
New Amsterdam, Dutch settlement at the mouth of the Hudson River and on the southern end of Manhattan island; est. 1624. It was the capital of the colony of New Netherland from 1626 to 1664, when it was captured by the British and renamed New York . source
posted by Anne B
Is this true?

"Nantucket at that time was under the jurisdiction of New Amsterdam."

The profile contradicts itself by saying both New York and New Amsterdam (sic? for New Netherland). Can anybody point me towards a definitive primary source or reputable secondary-source narrative of the series of transactions and their jurisdictions?

posted by Isaac Taylor
Two minor quibbles.

1) In the body of his bio, we should include the county: Salisbury, Essex, Massachuetts (and Salem, Essex, Massachusetts). Since they existed at that time.

Note that Salisbury was enormous in the beginning. His residences in now-distinct Newbury and Amesbury were within Salisbury, until Amesbury was eventually incorporated as a separate town (which he was first clerk of) shortly before he fled. The one constant, is he lived in Essex County from the day he arrived, right?

2) Nantucket County did not exist in his lifetime. Neither was it ever legally part of Massachusetts during his lifetime.

After he died it was temporarily part of Dukes County, New York, IIRC from 1683-1691; and then after 1691 it was absorbed (for the first time) into Massachusetts. Nantucket County dates from >1691 when the island was split out from Dukes County.

The correct "use their conventions not ours" style here is to call the island simply: Nantucket. Because it belonged to no higher-level political jurisdiction, at the time of his death. (Neither were there any town names on the island, when he arrived-- right? As I recall he was one of the first surveyors in the relative wilderness. (Is that correct?))

posted by Isaac Taylor
I don't believe Thomas' parents' names have ever been determined. Please supply source for listing them here (that isn't an ancestry family tree) or else I propose to disconnect them from his profile. Thanks.
Macy-791 and Macy-24 appear to represent the same person because: Please agree to merge these two profiles for the immigrant who died in Nantucket in 1682. The differences in birth year can be explained in the biography. To determine which is more likely, please refer to Robert Charles Anderson's "The Great MIgration Directory" page 217 for sources of information about Thomas Macy. Thanks!
posted by Kay (Johnson) Wilson