no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Lucy Marsh (1828)

Lucy Marsh
Born in Dudley, Worcestershire, Englandmap
Daughter of and
[sibling(s) unknown]
Wife of — married Mar 1847 in Dudley, Staffordshire, England, United Kingdommap
Descendants descendants
Mother of
Died [date unknown] in Dudley, Worcestershire, England, United Kingdommap [uncertain]
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Cheryl Bostrom private message [send private message] and Peter Forster private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 15 Nov 2012
This page has been accessed 152 times.

Biography

In the 1851 census Lucy (age 23) was the wife of Joseph Burkins in Dudley, Worcestershire, England.[1]

In the 1861 census Lucy (age 32) was the wife of Joseph Burkins in Dudley, Worcestershire, England.[2]

Sources

  1. 1851 Census: "1851 England Census," database with images, Ancestry Sharing Link - Ancestry Record 8860 #8785520 (accessed 24 December 2022), Lucy Burkins (23), wife, in household of Joseph Burkins (25) in Dudley registration district in Worcestershire, England. Born in Dudley, Worcestershire, England; citing Class HO107, Piece 2032, Folio 260, Page 11, GSU roll 87439, ED, institution, or vessel 1i, Household Schedule Number 36.
  2. 1861 Census: "1861 England Census," database with images, Ancestry Sharing Link - Ancestry Record 8767 #20581766 (accessed 24 December 2022), Lucy Burkins (32), wife, in household of Joseph Burkins (35) in Dudley registration district in Worcestershire, England. Born in Dudley, Worcestershire, England; citing Class Rg 9, Piece 2057, Folio 45, Page 20, GSU roll 542910, ED, institution, or vessel 20, Household schedule number 115.




Is Lucy your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Lucy's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 3

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Marsh-1908 and Marsh-1600 do not represent the same person because: Different husbands. Different census records
posted by Gillian Thomas
Hi, I removed the death date of 1857 from this profile as I found her in the 1861 census. Please could you check that looks right. Thanks so much!
posted by Gillian Thomas
Marsh-4747 and Marsh-1600 appear to represent the same person because: Obvious duplicates
posted by [Living Ford]

Rejected matches › Lucy (Marsh) Williams (abt.1830-)

M  >  Marsh  >  Lucy Marsh