no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Sarah Ann (Martin) Burrus (abt. 1732 - aft. 1760)

Sarah Ann Burrus formerly Martin
Born about in Louisa, Virginiamap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married 1748 in Louisa, Colony of Virginiamap
Descendants descendants
Died after after about age 27 in Louisa, Virginiamap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Kathie Forbes private message [send private message] and Jenny Lawless private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 27 Nov 2012
This page has been accessed 705 times.

Biography

Little is known of Sarah, the daughter of Joseph and Susannah Martin. Based on the ages of her children and the fact that she was married before 1755, she must have been born no later than 1738. She is named in her father's will: :"December 3, 1760 January 14, 1762 Will of Joseph Martin of Albemarle County, Virginia To my present wife, Ann Martin, .... All the rest of my estate to be divided between, Sarah Burrus, Mary Hammack, Susannah Martin, Ann Martin and Olive Martin. Son George Martin 8 pounds current money. Executors Isaac Davis Thomas Burrus" [1]

Sources

  1. Will of Joseph Martin: Albemarle County Will Book 2 Page 112 , transcript at Joseph Martin

Acknowledgments

WikiTree profile Ann-434 created through the import of Wilson_Miller_Hickman_States_o.ged on Nov 26, 2012 by Jerry Wilson. See the Changes page for the details of edits by Jerry and others.





Is Sarah your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Sarah by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Sarah:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 8

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Justina (Burrus) Hord was my 5th great grandmother in my matriline. Her daughter, Sarah (Hord) Smith, mother of Justina (Smith) Lovell, mother of Sarah Ann (Lovell) Wilson, mother of Ida Lee (Wilson) Ellis, mother of Elvessa (Ellis) Robinson, mother of Ella Louise (Robinson) Peterman. I have had my mitochondrial DNA tested.

I have good reason to think that Justina (Burrus) Hord was actually the daughter of Sarah (Martin) Burrus. I would like to see matrilineal descendants of Sarah (through her older daughters), as well as matrilineal descendants of Sarah's sisters get their mitochondrial DNA tested. If a match is found between them & me, it would go a long way toward demonstrating the actual mother of Justina (Burrus) Hord.

posted by Timothy Peterman
What suggests that Justina was the daughter of Sarah rather than Thomas Burros’ second wife?
posted by Kathie (Parks) Forbes
Justina's eldest daughter, Sarah (Hord) Smith, named a younger son, Joseph Martin Smith, for one thing. Also, Justina's birth year was likely the mid-1760s. If she were born in 1766, she was as close in time to the last reported instance of Sarah being alive, as she was to the first reported instance of Thomas being married to Ann. Also consider that in my matriline from Justina/ Jestina Burris/ Burrus on down to my great-great aunt, Jessie, we have a pattern of given names altering from Justina to Sarah to Justina to Sarah to Justina. This doesn't prove that the mother of Justina was a Sarah, but it would fit the pattern.

My point though, is that I offer my mitochondrial result as a means of testing this hypothesis. Of course, I need another result for comparison.

posted by Timothy Peterman
Merged, but Isaac doesn’t seem to belong. Maybe a grandson?
posted on Ann-434 (merged) by Kathie (Parks) Forbes
Ann-434 and Martin-10765 appear to represent the same person because: Part duplicate/part GED import gone wrong where individual's given name went in the surname field. Merging these two is the only real way to eliminate this error.
posted on Martin-10765 (merged) by Amy Garber
Based on the births of her children it looks like Sarah married about 1754. That would mean a birthdate before 1738.
posted on Martin-10765 (merged) by Kathie (Parks) Forbes
Sarah's dates are off. She could not have been born in 1748, married, had two children, and died by 1760. Also, she was alive and marriedin December, 1760 when her father wrote his will. It was not probated until 1762, so probate records may show whether she was still alive then and she must have been born well before 1748 to be married in 1760.
posted on Martin-10765 (merged) by Kathie (Parks) Forbes
edited by Kathie (Parks) Forbes
Martin-30872 and Martin-10765 appear to represent the same person because: Many discrepancies, but clearly meant to be the same woman. Martin family is well-documented, should be able to resolve and merge
posted on Martin-10765 (merged) by Kathie (Parks) Forbes

M  >  Martin  |  B  >  Burrus  >  Sarah Ann (Martin) Burrus