Biography

Samuel McCulloch was born in Ireland.

John was born in 1682 and passed away in 1754^[1]

Samuel McCulloch* & Elizabeth Ward Married: Ireland Samuel McCulloch, a son of John and Mary (Campbell) McCulloch, was born in Ireland in 1705 and died in Gloucester County, New Jersey in 1748. His will was dated November 30, 1748 (another source says June 8, 1748). Samuel married Elizabeth Ward in Ireland and the family made the Atlantic crossing, moving to New Jersey with his parents in 1724. Children of Samuel and Elizabeth: 1) JOHN, b. 1725/6 (named for Samuel’s father), m. Sarah Inskeep in 1749. 2) George, b. 1728 in New Jersey, (named for Elizabeth’s father), d. ca 1801 probably in Brooke Co, VA (WVA). 3) Mary (named for Samuel’s mother), m. Thomas Ashby Nov. 14, 1752 in Stafford Co. VA 4) Elizabeth, b. 1732 (named for her mother) m. William Hamilton on February 11, 1751/52. Note: This couple decided to remove to the West Indies, but Hamilton became seriously ill and died at sea. Elizabeth Hamilton was expecting a child. Her husband’s only sister , Mrs. Charles Graves, was then living in St.Augustine, Florida, invited Elizabeth to come and live with her and her husband. It was in St. Augustine, Florida, that Elizabeth McCullough Hamilton gave birth to a daughter, Jane Hamilton. 5) Hannah, b. 1737, d. 1791 (named for Elizabeth’s mother), married Joseph Inskeep, 6) Thomas, b. 1735, d. 1780; m .Isabelle Patrick in 1759 in Albemarle County, VA. Note: He was a Lieutenant in the Revolution and was wounded in the Battle of King's Mountain in North Carolina October 2, 1780. He died of his wounds in Rutherford, NC and is buried there.

Parents of Samuel McColloch: John McCulloch and Mary Campbell who were both born in Scotland in 1682. They were supporters of the British monarchy and fled to Ireland about 1700. They emigrated from Ireland to Gloucester County, New Jersey, where they died about 1730. Children of John and Mary (Campbell) McCulloch. (1). SAMUEL b. 1705 - d.1748, m. Elizabeth Ward 1724; (2) John b.1708; and (3) Robert b.1710. Parents of Elizabeth Ward: George Ward and Hannah (unknown), of Gloucester Co. NJ

• The McCulloch name is spelled various ways, the most common is ‘McColloch.’

GLOUCESTER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY Old Gloucester County was formed on May 26, 1686 from the third and fourth tenths of the province of West Jersey. Greenwich Township became the first township. Incorporated on March 1, 1694. The original townships formed at that time were Gloucester, Deptford, Greenwich, Waterford, Newton and Egg Harbor. It included present-day Atlantic County and Camden County. Woodbury is the county seat of Gloucester County. Atlantic County set off in 1837. Camden County set off in 1844.

Samuel McColloch Birth: 1705, Ireland Death: Jun. 8, 1748 Gloucester County, New Jersey^[2]

Family links: Spouse: Elizabeth Ward^[3]

Children: John McColloch (1726 - 1778)*^[4] George McColloch (1728 - 1801)*^[5]

Abstract of Will of Samuel McColloch (McCulluch) Will dated 8 June 1748 McColloch (McCulluch), Samuel, of Gloucester Township and County, yeoman. Sons - John (eldest, not 23), to have 400 acres of the homestead fronting Timber Creek, a tract, which was his grandfather's and my father's (John McCulloch's), also the meadows and two tracts of land and cedar swamps called Faraway Swamp, and all my lands formerly Montgomery's; George, at 21, to have the other part of my plantation, 200 acres, begining at Samuel Hazard's upper corner, and the principal and interest from the sale of pine land, 220 acres, at Four Mile Branch road, also White Oak, Fish Creek and White Hall Cedar Swamps. Daughters - Mary, Elizabeth and Hannah McCulluch. Executor - son, John. Witnesses - James Cooper, David Ward, Michael Fisher. Sworn and affirmed 30 June, 1748. Lib. 8, p. 255. 1748, June 29. Inventory (£336.18.11) includes watch, cattle, horses, sheep, timber, husbandry tools. Appraisers - John Blackwood, Richard Cheeseman.

Samuel was the son of John McCullough and Mary Catherine Campbell, born 1705 in Mamacullen, Aamagh, Ulster, Ireland. The immigrated settling in near Philadelphia, Pennsylvania^[6]

Samuel married Elizabeth Ward 23 Jun 1726 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania^[7]

Samuel was killed by indians 8 Jun 1748^[8]

J. H. Newton, G.G. Nicols, and A. G. Sprankle, HISTORY OF THE PAN-HANDLE, West Virginia, 1879, pp. 134-135; Ohio County Library, http://www.ohiocountylibrary.org/wheeling-history/4298, contributed by Linda Cunningham Fluharty.
THE M'COLLOCH FAMILY - Among the earliest settlers in Northwestern Virginia were the McCollochs, who emigrated from the south branch of the Potomac, in 1770, and located on the borders of Short creek, stream which empties into the Ohio river nine miles north of Wheeling creek. The family consisted of four brothers. Abraham, George, Samuel and John, and two sisters, one of whom Elizabeth, was the wife of Ebenezer Zane, who, with his brothers Jonathan and Silas, came from the same neighborhood, and settled at the mouth of Wheeling creek.
The father of the McCollochs, whose name was also Samuel is said to have been sent by the government some time previous with a number of men from Alexandria over the Allegheny mountains to Fort Pitt. History only speaks of the settlement of the four sons and two daughters, but the present descendants assert that the father accompanied them down the river with the Zane's in the spring of 1770, and that after settling them upon the ridge bordering on Short creek, he with his wife, returned to his native place across the mountains and after some years was taken off by the yellow fever.
(KJW note: Father is John, grandfather is Samuel- father died after trip over mtn)

Between the two younger brothers of the McColloch family Samuel and John, whose daring achievements in Indian warfare fill the pages of history, seem to have existed a more than fraternal intimacy, arising not only from congeniality of disposition, but from community of interests and pursuits; consequently they were much together, and their history is in some degree blended.
Samuel, whose name has been immortalized by his famous leap down an almost perpendicular precipice to escape the Indians on the 2d of September, 1777, has thereby become the most noted member of the family, in historical annals.
At a very early age he distinguished himself as a bold and efficient borderer. As an Indian fighter he had no superior. He seemed to track the wily red man with a sagacity as remarkable as his efforts were successful. He was almost constantly engaged in excursions against the enemy, or "scouting" for the security of the settlements. It was mainly to these energetic operations that the frontier was so often saved from savage depredation, and by cutting off their retreat, attacking their hunting camps, and annoying them in various other ways, he rendered himself so great an object of fear and hatred. For these they marked him allowed sleepless vengeance against his name. To many of the savages these brothers were personally known, and were objects of intense fear and hate. Numerous artifices were employed to capture them; their enemies anticipating, in such an event, the privilege of satiating their vindictive malice, by the infliction of a lingering and cruel death. Of this design, on the part of the Indians, the brothers were aware; and in their almost miraculous preservation, in various contests with them, gratefully acknowledged the interposition of an in visible power in their behalf.
In consideration of his many very efficient services, Samuel McColloch was commissioned Major in 1775.
While the enemy was pressing the siege of Wheeling, in 1777, Major Samuel McColloch, at the head of forty mounted men, from Short creek, made their appearance in front of the fort, the gates of which were joyfully thrown open. Simultaneously with the appearance of McColloch's men, re-appeared the enemy, and a rush was made to cutoff the entrance of some of the party. All, however, succeeding in getting in except the gallant Major, who, anxious for the safety of his men, held back until his own chance was entirely cut off. Finding himself surrounded by savages, he rode at full speed in the direction of the hill.
The enemy, with exulting yells, followed close in pursuit, not doubting they would capture one whom of all other men, they preferred to wreak their vengeance upon. The Indians drove the gallant Major to the summit of a lofty hill, which overhangs the present city of Wheeling. Knowing their relentless hostility toward himself, he strained every muscle of his noble steed to gain the summit, and then escape along the brow in the direction of Van Metre's fort. At length he attained the top, and galloping ahead of his pursuers, rejoiced at his lucky escape. As he gained a point on the hill near where the Cumberland Road now crosses, what should he suddenly encounter but a considerable body of Indians, who were just returning from a plundering excursion among the settlements.
In an instant, he comprehended the full extent of his danger. Escape seemed out of the question, either in the direction of Short creek or back to the bottom. A fierce and revengeful foe completely hemmed him in, cutting off every chance of successful retreat or escape. What was to be done? Fall into their hands, and share the most refined torture savage ingenuity could invent? That thought was agony, and in an instant the bold soldier, preferring death among the rocks and bramble to the knife and fagot of the savage, determined to plunge over the precipice before him. Without a moment's hesitation, for the savages were pressing upon him, he firmly adjusted himself in the saddle, grasped securely the bridle with his left hand, and supporting his rifle in the right, pushed his unfaltering old horse over! A plunge, a crash,-crackling timber and tumbling rocks were all that the wondering savages could see or hear. They looked chagrined but bewildered, one at another; and while they inwardly regretted that the fire had been spared its duty, they could not but greatly rejoice that their most in veterate enemy was at length beyond the power of doing further injury. But, lo! ere a single savage had recovered from his amazement, what should they see but the invulnerable major on his white steed, galloping across the peninsula. Such was the feat of Major McColloch, certainly one of the most daring and successful ever attempted. The place has become memorable as McColloch's leap, and will remain, so long as the hill stands, and the recollections of the past have a place in the hearts of the people. Our engraver has given a very effective and correct representation of this "leap."
It is to us a matter of great regret, that more of the stirring incidents in this man's life have not been collected and preserved. We have heard of many daring feats of personal prowess, but they come to us in such a mixed and unsatisfactory form, as to render their publication, at this time, unsafe.
In the spring of 1782, General Irvine called a convention of the lieutenants of the several counties and the principal field officers of the militia, as well as citizens of note, in the Western Department, for the purpose of devising means for the defense of the border. The convention met on the 5th of April, and we find the names of Major Samuel McColloch and David Shepherd, as the representatives of Ohio county, Va.
From the year 1777 to 1782 Major Samuel McColloch commanded at Fort Van Meter, styled the "Court House Fort," from the circumstance of the first civil court in Northwestern Virginia being held in it immediately after the organization and separation of Ohio county from West Augusta. This fort was one of the first erected in this part of Virginia, and stood on the north side of Short creek, about five miles from its confluence with the Ohio river. During many consecutive summers the inhabitants of the adjacent neighborhood sought security from the tomahawk and scalping-knife of the merciless aborigines within its palisades; agricultural labor being performed by companies, each member of which wrought with one hand while the other grasped a weapon of defence.
On the 30th July, 1782, arrangements were made by the inmates of the fort for the performance of field labor. To the commander and his brother, John, was assigned the dangerous duty of reconnoitering the paths leading from the river, to ascertain, if possible, whether there were any Indians lurking in the vicinity. Leaving early in the morning, in the discharge of their mission, after proceeding some distance, the former, impelled perhaps by a sudden premonition of the tragic fate which befell him, returned, and, depositing with the wife of his brother John, his watch and several other articles, gave directions as to their disposition, in the event of his not returning, and, leaving a kindly message for his youthful bride, soon rejoined his wondering companion.
They traversed the path lying along the south bank of the creek till within a short distance of its junction with the Ohio, where they crossed, and followed the direction of the river to the Beech bottom, a distance of three miles, when, perceiving no indications of an enemy, they retraced their steps to the mouth of the creek, a short distance above which they ascended a steep and rugged eminence, well known in the neighborhood by the significant cognomen of "Girty's Point." The notorious renegade, Simon Girty, having on several occasions, when conducting parties of Indians into the settlement, with difficulty escaped capture by the infuriated whites by a rapid flight over the craggy and precipitous path.
Congratulating themselves on the absence of immediate danger, the brothers pursued their course in the direction of the fort, on the summit of the elevated ridge rising abruptly from the northern bank of the creek, and had arrived at the termination of a deep ravine which made up from the stream - John being somewhat in advance of his brother, and riding round the top of a large tree which had fallen across the way - when a low, half-suppressed growl, from a well-trained hunting dog which accompanied them arrested their attention. No time, however, intervened for scrutinizing the cause; a volley of bullets from an invisible foe revealed it. On reaching the path John turned to look for his companion, whose bleeding form, with feelings of unutterable anguish, he beheld falling from his horse, and, ere it reached the earth, a stalwart savage sprang from his covert, tomahawk and scalping-knife in hand, with which to complete the bloody tragedy and secure a trophy of victory. While the exulting victor was in the act of scalping his victim the younger brother, with a frenzied resolution, suddenly wheeled his horse and, amid a shower of balls, elevating his rifle, quickly sent the swift messenger of death to the heart of the murderer, whom he had the exquisite gratification of seeing spring into the air, then fall to rise no more. Having performed this feat, he, as fast as possible, his enraged enemies in full pursuit, their balls perforating his hat and hunting-shirt, made his way down the ravine and soon reached the fort in safety, his brother's horse closely following him.
The next morning a party from the fort, proceeded to the spot where the sanguinary deed had been perpetrated, and found the mutilated remains of their beloved commander. The Indians influenced no doubt, by that species of hero-worship, inherent in their nature, causing an undoubted admiration of personal valor, had abstracted the heart of their victim; which, it was afterward learned, from one belonging to the party, had been eaten by them; a practice in which they occasionally indulged. Parkman, who was well acquainted with their habits, says: "The Indians, though not habitual cannibals, some times, eat portions of the bodies of their enemies, superstitiously believing that their own courage and hardihood will be increased thereby."
This fatal rencounter was, doubtless, instrumental in the salvation of the lives of all in the fort; it being subsequently ascertained that the party committing the murderous act consisted of upwards of one hundred warriors, en route to attack it.
After the escape of the surviving brother, aware that notice of their propinquity would be given, and immediate pursuit made, they hastily retreated to their towns west of the Ohio.
The remains of Major Samuel McColloch were interred in Fort Van Meter; but not unwept nor unhonored. There were present very many who knew and appreciated the sterling worth of the forest soldier, and by whom the memory of his noble qualities and tragic fate was long cherished; and to this day, in the vicinity where the circumstances transpired, the name and fate of the hero are as familiar as household words.
Major McColloch had married a Miss Mitchell only six months before his death. His widow afterward married Andrew Woods.
The place where this fatal disaster occurred, was on the farm now owned by James Ridgely, on the road known as Girty's point road, about two miles from the mouth of Short creek, Brooke county. His remains were interred near Fort Van Metre, where rest many of the patriots and pioneers of the land. No stone or monument has ever been erected, by their unappreciative descendants, to mark the last resting place of these noble men. Even the trees which were wont to smile upon their graves were not suffered to stand and tell to future generations where their ashes rest.

MAJOR SAMUEL McCOLLOCH
S. Myers, MYERS' HISTORY OF WEST VIRGINIA, Volume 1 (The Wheeling News Lithograph Company), Chapter XVIII, pages 298-302.
The greater portion of the following information regarding the history of the McCollochs is taken from DeHass' Indian Wars. This sketch relates principally to Samuel McColloch, though, incidentally, other members of the family will be mentioned in this chapter. There were two Major McCollochs -- John and Samuel -- and for a time it was erroneously believed by many that John was the one who made the famous leap over the precipice at Wheeling at the point now known as McColloch's Leap. But DeHass has produced evidence which shows conclusively that Samuel was tbe hero of this episode. It might seem strange to us at this time that there could be any question about the identity of persons so well known as the McCollochs were in and about Wheeling. But when we consider the fact that but few written memoranda were made by the first settlers, and these were usually of such vague natures to often cause confusion, and that the rest of our information has been handed down by word of mouth from generation to generation, dependent upon fickle memory, it is not strange that discrepancies occur here and there in the annals of West Virginia.

The McColloch family, we are told, was one of the earliest that settled on Short Creek. There were originally three brothers, Abraham, Samuel and John, and two sisters. Colonel Ebenezer Zane married Elizabeth, "whose life was a model of gentleness, virtue and love. Of the brothers, no men were more respected by their neighbors, or more dreaded by the Indians. Abraham was the eldest, Samuel next, and John the third." Samuel was a noted Indian scout and hunter and in this capacity he had but few, if any, superiors. To such scouts as Samuel McColloch, Lewis Wetzel, Ebenezer Zane, Daniel Boone, and a few others of their kind, the early settlements often owed their very existence, for these settlements could not long have survived the frequent attacks of the savages had it not been for these faithful "watch dogs" of the forests. But there was a large territory to guard; the foe were many, and comparatively few competent scouts. It can not, therefore, be considered strange that the Indian's sometimes slipped by unnoticed by these scouts, and the first notice or warning the settlers had of their presence was the terrible savage war-cry. As a mark of appreciation of his services, Samuel McColloch was commissioned Major in 1775.

Reference has been made elsewhere in this book to the part taken by our hero in the battle between the whites and the savages at Wheeling, September 2nd, 1777.

It will be remembered that the Indians drove the gallant Major to the summit of a lofty hill, which overhangs the present city of Wheeling, now known as McColloch's Leap. Realizing that if he should not succeed in escaping his savage pursuers his fate would be sealed, he strained every muscle of his noble steed to gain the summit and then escape along the brow in direction of Van Meter's fort on Short Creek. Having reached the top, he galloped ahead of his pursuers until he reached the point of the hill near the late crossing of the old Cumberland road. Here he encountered a large body of Indians who were just returning from a plundering expedition among the settlements.

This placed him in a very critical situation. Escape seemed almost an impossibility, either in the direction of Short Creek or back to the bottom. The hill at this point is about three hundred feet in height, and at that time was, in many places, almost perpendicular. The savage horde was pressing upon the Major, determined upon his capture. To hesitate longer meant sure death at the stake. To leap over the fearful precipice seemed equally fatal; so quickly adjusting himself in his saddle, grasping securely the bridle with his left hand and supporting his rifle in the right, he forced his horse to make the leap! Down, down, they went, crashing through timber and tumbling over rocks, while the savages peered over the precipice, no doubt in hopeful expectation that their bitter enemy had at last been killed. But to their wonder and amazement, they saw the invulnerable Major on his white steed, galloping across the bottom, safe from pursuit!

Many other interesting stories of adventure are told of the Major, but they are not sufficiently authentic to warrant our repeating here.

"Towards the end of July, 1782, indications of Indians having been noticed by some of the settlers, Major Samuel McColloch and his brother John mounted their horses and left Van Meter's fort to ascertain the correctness of the report. They crossed Short Creek and continued in the direction of Wheeling, but inclined towards the river. They scouted closely, but cautiously, and not discovering any such 'signs' as had been stated, descended to the bottom at a point on the farm owned by the late Alfred P. Woods, about two miles above Wheeling, They then passed up the river to the mouth of Short Creek, and thence up Girty's Point in the direction of Van Meter's. (Note: Girty's Point is a short distance of from the Ohio River, and is the abrupt termination of one of the elevated ridges. It derived its name from Girty, the white renegade. It was his favorite route into the interior. The path first made by the Indians is still in use by the people of the neighborhood. -DeHass).

"Not discovering any indications of the enemy, the brothers were riding leisurely along, on July 30th, 1782, and when a short distance beyond the point a deadly discharge of rifles took place, killing Major McColloch instantly. His brother John escaped, but his horse as killed. Immediately mounting that of his brother, he made off, to give the alarm. As yet no enemy had been seen; but turning in his saddle, after riding fifty yards, he saw the path was filled with Indians and one fellow in the act of scalping the unfortunate Major. Quick as thought, the rifle of John was at his shoulder, and in an instant more the savage was rolling in the agonies of death. John escaped to the fort unhurt, with the exception of a slight wound on his hip.

"On the following day, a party of men from Van Meter's fort went out and gathered up the mutilated remains, of Major McColloch.

"Major John McColloch was, perhaps, quite as brave and true as his brother. He did ample service in the cause of our long struggle for independence, and a more devoted patriot could not be found. He filled many important posts of honor and trust and was generally respected. The early records of Ohio County show that he acted a conspicuous part on the bench and otherwise. ^[9]

Sources

1. ↑ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McColloch%27s_Leap
2. ↑ Find a Grave, database and images (accessed 11 June 2020), memorial page for Samuel McColloch (1705–8 Jun 1748), Find A Grave: Memorial #181002361, ; Maintained by Fred Higgins Marshall (contributor 48755402) Non-Cemetery Burial, who reports a Burial place unknown..
3. ↑ Find A Grave: Memorial #181002421
4. ↑ Find A Grave: Memorial #181003506
5. ↑ Find A Grave: Memorial #176051402
6. ↑ Irish Emigrants in North America, Part Four and Part FiveI, page 31
7. ↑ Pennsylvania Marriage Records. Harrisburg, PA: Pennsylvania Archives Printed Series, 1876. Series 2, Series 6.
8. ↑ https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/181002361
9. ↑ http://www.wvculture.org/history/settlement/mcculloch

See also:

• http://genforum.genealogy.com/cooper/messages/1749.html

• Sources include DAR/SAR records.

• Record Url: https://www.search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?indiv=1&db=NJWillsAbstracts&h=19079

Name: Samuel McColloch Residence Date: 8 Jun 1748 Residence Location: Gloucester, Gloucester, New Jersey, United States Source Information: Ancestry.com New Jersey, Abstract of Wills, 1670-1817 (database on-line). Provo, UT, USA: Original data: New Jersey State Archives. New Jersey, Published Archives Series, First Series. Trenton, New Jersey: John L. Murphy Publishing Company.

• http://www.celticradio.net/php/forums/index.php?act=Attach&type=post&id=102052

1. JOHN1 MCCULLOCH1 was born WFT Est. 1569-15981, and died WFT Est. 1623-16831. He married ELIZABETH MCCULLOCH1 WFT Est. 1595-16381. She was born WFT Est. 1578-16011, and died WFT Est. 1623-16891. Child of JOHN MCCULLOCH and ELIZABETH MCCULLOCH is: 2. i. SIR ALEXANDER2 MCCULLOCH, b. Bef. 1620, Scotland; d. June 03, 1675, Scotland. 2. SIR ALEXANDER2 MCCULLOCH (JOHN1)1 was born Bef. 1620 in Scotland1, and died June 03, 1675 in Scotland1. He married ANNA FERGUSSON1 Bef. 1638 in Scotland1. She was born WFT Est. 1600-16261, and died Aft. 16991. More About SIR ALEXANDER MCCULLOCH: Cause of Death: Drowned1 More About ANNA FERGUSSON: Fact 1: 1635, The only sure date I can find is that she was alive by this time.1 Fact 2: Suspected to be of the Kilkerran family.1 Marriage Notes for ALEXANDER MCCULLOCH and ANNA FERGUSSON: [v09t2400.ftw] Note: I asigned dates to all of the children except Sir Godfrey to make it easier for me to find them. These dates are not fact. 1640 Sir Alexander M'Culloch succeeded to a few burdened acres. At some period after 1625, Charles I, made Alexander a Baronet of Nova Scotia. 1675 Before this date, Alexander and his son Sir Godfrey, perpetrated cruelities against the widow of Gordon of Cardoness at Bush O' Bield. After "invading her ain hoose, did first beat her almost to death with the stilt wherewith she walked and then dragged her out of her hoose and left her upon the dunghill, which shortly thereafter was the cause of her death." The M'Cullochs were convivted and sentenced to a fine and imprisionment; this sentence was rescinded the next day. Children of ALEXANDER MCCULLOCH and ANNA FERGUSSON are: i. ALEXANDER3 MCCULLOCH1, b. Abt. 1638, Scotland1; d. Bef. 16751. More About ALEXANDER MCCULLOCH: Fact 1: Predeceased his father with no issue.1 3. ii. SIR GODFREY MCCULLOCH, b. 1640, Edinburgh, Galloway Parish, Scotland; d. March 26, 1697, Edinburgh, Galloway Parish, Scotland. 4. iii. WILLIAM MCCULLOCH, b. Abt. 1642; d. WFT Est. 1684-1733. 5. iv. CAPTAIN JOHN MCCULLOCH, b. Abt. 1644, Scotland; d. WFT Est. 1661-1734 . v. AGNES MCCULLOCH1, b. Abt. 16461; d. WFT Est. 1660-17401; m. WILLIAM LINCOLN1, WFT Est. 1660-16891; b. WFT Est. 1630-16491; d. 17051. 6. vi. JANE MCCULLOCH, b. Abt. 1648; d. WFT Est. 1666-1742.

3. SIR GODFREY3 MCCULLOCH (ALEXANDER2, JOHN1)1 was born 1640 in Edinburgh, Galloway Parish, Scotland1, and died March 26, 1697 in Edinburgh, Galloway Parish, Scotland1. He married AGNES KENNEDY1 October 26, 1667 in Scotland1, daughter of GILBERT KENNEDY and MARION KENNEDY. She was born WFT Est. 1631-16561, and died Aft. 16971. More About SIR GODFREY MCCULLOCH: Cause of Death: Beheaded.1 Marriage Notes for GODFREY MCCULLOCH and AGNES KENNEDY: [v09t2400.ftw] Sir Godfrey and Agnes McCulloch had five more boys, names and dates not known at this time. 1675 Before this date, Alexander and his son Sir Godfrey, perpetrated cruelities against the widow of Gordon of Cardoness at Bush O' Bield. After "invading her ain hoose, did first beat her almost to death with the stilt wherewith she walked and then dragged her out of her hoose and left her upon the dunghill, which shortly thereafter was the cause of her death." The M'Cullochs were convivted and sentenced to a fine and imprisionment; this sentence was rescinded the next day. 1675 Sir Godfrey McCulloch succeeded to some doubtful rights. 1678 Sir Godfrey represented the Stewartry (Kirkcudbrights) in the Convention of Estates (Scottish Parliament). 1682 Sir Godfrey was appointed Sheriff-Depute of Stranraer. A commission was issued to him for "tendering the Test to Gentry and Commons within the Shire of Wigton." (Sir Godfrey was an anti-Covenanter). 1684 After this date, great animosity existed between Sir Godfrey and William Gorden. Sir Godfrey went to Gordon's house at Bussabiel to get some cattle released from pound. Both men were armed, but only Sir Godfrey fired. Gordon received a wound in the leg which proved fatal. Sir Godfrey fled to foreign parts. Years later he returned and lived in Edinburgh. One Sunday when he attended public worship, a Galloway gentleman recognized him and shouted, "Steik the door! There's a murderer in the Kirk." Sir Godfrey was arrested, tried and condemned to death. He was the last man to perish on the "Maiden," the Scottish equivalent of the guillotine. (Note: The Maiden is now in the Museum of Antiquities, Edinburgh.) Sir Godfrey was beheaded 26th of March 1697. Major Walter MacCulloch of Ardwall tells this story: Several of Sir Godfrey's friends were present and caught Sir Godfrey's head as it was severed. The decapitated body rose from its kneeling position and ran 100 yards down the Royal Mile. Major Walter feels that Sir Godfrey should not have been executed; that he was framed by those who had most to gain by his death. Although a violent man, Sir Godfrey sternly refused to have anything to do with the brutal treatment of the Wigtown Martyrs, when those women were tied to stakes and drowned in the estuary of River Bladenoch. The following is the last speech of Sir Godfrey M'Culloch, "Of Myretoun, Knight and Baronet, who was beheaded at the Cross of Edinburgh, the twenty sixth day of March, 1697: I Am brought here good People to give Satisfaction to justice, for the Slaughter of William Gordon designed of Cardines; and therefore I am obliged as a dying Man, to give a Faithfull and True Account of that matter. I do declare in the Sight of God, I had no design against his Life, nor did I expect to see him, when I came where the Accident happened; I came there contrair to my Inclination, being pressed by these two Persons, who were the Principal Witnesses against me, (they declaring he was not out of Bed) that I might relieve their Goods he had poinded; I do freely forgive them, and I Pray heartily GOD may forgive them, for bringing me to that place. When I was in England, I was oft times urged by several Persons, who declared that they had Commission from Castle-Stewart and his Lady, (now the Pursuers for my Blood) that I might give up the papers of these lands of Cardines, whereupon they promised not only a piece of money, but also to concur for procuring me a Remission; And I have been several times since in the Countrie, where the Misfortune happened, and where they lived, but never troubled by any of them; Although now after they have got themselves secured in these Lands without me, they have been very active in the Pursute, until at last they have got me to this Place. I do acknowledge my Sentence is Just, and does not Repine; for albeit it was only a single wound in the Legg, by a shot of small Hail, which was neither intended, or could be forseen to be deadly; Yet I do believe, that God in his justice hath suffered me to fall in that miserable Accident, for which I am now to suffer, because of my many other Great and Grevious unrepented for Sins: I do therefore heartily forgive my Judges, Accusers, Witnesses, and all Others who have now, or at any time Injured me, as I wish to be Forgiven. I Recommend my wife, and poor children to the Protection of the Almighty GOD, who doth take care of, and Provides for the widow and the Fatherless; And Prayes, that GOD may Stirr up an Enable their Friends and mine, to be Careful of them. I have been Branded as being a Roman Catholick, which I altogether disown, and Declare, as the words of a Dying man, who am instantly to make my Appearance before the Great Tribunal of the Great GOD, that I die in the True Catholick Reformed Protestant Religion, Renouncing all Righteousness of my own, or any others; Relying only upon the Merits of Christ Jesus, through whose Blood, I hope to be Saved, and whom I Trust, will not only be my judge, But also, Advocate with the Father for my Redemption. Now Dear Spectators, As my Last Request, Again and Again, I ernestly Desire and Begg, The Assistance of Your Fervent Prayers, That, Although I stand here Condemned by Man, I may be Absolved before the Tribunal of the Great God, That in place of this Scaffold I may enjoy a Throne of Glory; That this Violent Death may bring me to a Life of Glorious Rest, Eternal in the Heavens; And that in place of all these Spectators, I may be Accompanyed with an Innumerable Company of Saints and Angles, Singing, Hallelujah to the Great KING to all Eternity. Now, O LORD, Remember me with that Love Thou bearest to Thy Own, O visite me with Thy Salvation, that I may see the Good of Thy Chosen ones, and may Glory in Thy Inheritance. LORD JESUS Purge me from all my Sins, and from this of Blood Guiltiness, Wash me in Thy Own Blood. Great are mine Iniquities, But Greater are the Mercies of GOD! O let me be amongst the number of those for whom CHRIST died; Be Thou my Advocate with the Father, Into Thy hands do I recommend my Spirit; Come, Lord Jesus Come, and receive my Soul, Amen. Sic Subscribitur Sir GODFREY M'CULLOCH The foregone was Printed by John Reid, in Edinburgh, and are to be sold at his Printing House in Bells Wynd. 1697. Agnes removed to Ireland with her children after Sir Godfreys death. Children of GODFREY MCCULLOCH and AGNES KENNEDY are: i. SIR GILBERT4 MCCULLOCH1, b. Abt. 16691; d. 1704, Flanders1. ii. AGNES MCCULLOCH1, b. Abt. 16711; d. WFT Est. 1672-17651. iii. 2 MCCULLOCH1, b. Abt. 16751; d. WFT Est. 1676-17651. 7. iv. JOHN MCCULLOCH, b. 1682, Parish Galloway, Scotland; d. October 15, 1750, Bohemia Manor, Cecil County, Maryland. v. 3 MCCULLOCH1, b. Abt. 16841; d. WFT Est. 1685-17741 . vi. 4 MCCULLOCH1, b. Abt. 16861; d. WFT Est. 1687-17761. vii. 5 MCCULLOCH1, b. Abt. 16881; d. WFT Est. 1689-17781.

7. JOHN4 MCCULLOCH (GODFREY3, ALEXANDER2, JOHN1)1 was born 1682 in Parish Galloway, Scotland1, and died October 15, 1750 in Bohemia Manor, Cecil County, Maryland2,3. He married (1) ?3 WFT Est. 1699-17313. She was born WFT Est. 1676-17003, and died WFT Est. 1724-17873. He married (2) ?3 Bef. 1716 in Ulster, Ireland3. She was born WFT Est. 1674-16983, and died 17164,5. Notes for JOHN MCCULLOCH: [v09t2400.ftw] John's will stipulated that his estate be divided between his two children but does not name them. Marriage Notes for JOHN MCCULLOCH and ?: [v09t2400.ftw] This second wife of John McCulloch died in Ireland during the Irish Potato Famine at Ulster in 1728. Marriage Notes for JOHN MCCULLOCH and ?: [v09t2400.ftw] John McCullough married twice, in Ireland, one son to each marriage. He was widowed twice.

John McCulloch brought his two sons, Thomas and Samuel, to America between 1728 and December 1735. "My Grandparents told stories of the McCulloch family many times when I was growing up. One of the stories was about how both the (McCu) llogh's and the (McCu) lloch's were both from the same family, a Lord or Baren or something of that sort, who's son had his head lopped off. I was told that one side of the family took the "ough" spelling, after having been born in Ireland of Scottish parents, to protect themselves from the law, because of some criminal activities that had been perpetrated by them. When the various sides of the family migrated to the United States the "ough" side was supposed to have gone to Ohio, while the "och's" ended up in West Virginia. Grandpa always said that "the "ough's" were all a bunch of cattle thieves, so ought to have done well in their new land...." I found that my father and my uncle were told much the same stories. It was very confusing unraveling all the Ough's and Och's but I think I've come pretty close. Note: Delores M. McCulloch. Child of JOHN MCCULLOCH and ? is: 9. i. SAMUEL5 MCCULLOCH, b. 1721, Ulster, County Tyrone, Ireland; d. 1802, Cecil County, Maryland. Child of JOHN MCCULLOCH and ? is: 10.

ii. THOMAS5 MCCULLOUGH, b. 1716, County Tyrone, Ireland; d. 1782, Rockbridge County, Virginia.

9. SAMUEL5 MCCULLOCH (JOHN4, GODFREY3, ALEXANDER2, JOHN1)5 was born 1721 in Ulster, County Tyrone, Ireland5, and died 1802 in Cecil County, Maryland5. He married MARY5 Abt. 17455. She was born WFT Est. 1708-17345, and died Bef. 1802 in Cecil County, Maryland5. Marriage Notes for SAMUEL MCCULLOCH and MARY: [v09t2400.ftw] Agnes Kennedy McCulloch, widow of Sir Godfrey McCulloch, raised Thomas McCullough in Ireland after his mother's death. He assumed the Irish spelling of the last name and his brother Samuel stayed with the Scottish spelling of McCulloch. Samuel's mother died during the Irish Potato Famine at Ulster in 1728. John McCulloch brought his two sons, Thomas and Samuel, to America between 1728 and December 1735. Samuel's will was dated August 20, 1802 and proved April 24, 1802(sic), before it was written. It's possible the second 1802 should have been 1803 but who knows? Children of SAMUEL MCCULLOCH and MARY are: 13. i. SARAH6 MCCULLOCH, b. Abt. 1745; d. WFT Est. 1774-1839. ii. SUSANNAH MCCULLOCH5, b. 17485; d. WFT Est. 1762-18425; m. WILLIAM MCDOWELL5, WFT Est. 1762-17955; b. WFT Est. 1731-17515; d. WFT Est. 1765-18375. 14. iii. JOHN MCCULLOCH, b. 1752; d. January 07, 1827, Pleasant Flats, Mason County, Virginia. iv. MARY MCCULLOCH5, b. Abt. 17565; d. WFT Est. 1770-18505; m. JAMES HINDMAN5, WFT Est. 1770-18035; b. WFT Est. 1739-17595; d. WFT Est. 1773-18455. 15. v. ELEANOR MCCULLOCH, b. Abt. 1760; d. WFT Est. 1795-1855. 16. vi. HANNAH MCCULLOCH, b. Abt. 1764; d. WFT Est. 1801-1859. vii. SAMUEL MCCULLOCH5, b. Abt. 17685; d. WFT Est. 1799-18595; m. MARY HALL5, May 16, 1793, Cecil County, Maryland5; b. WFT Est. 1755-17775; d. WFT Est. 1798-18665. viii. MARGARET MCCULLOCH5, b. Abt. 17725; d. WFT Est. 1804-18665; m. ROBERT WILKINSON5, April 09, 1800, Cecil County, Maryland5; b. WFT Est. 1752-17805; d. WFT Est. 1805-18655.

13. SARAH6 MCCULLOCH (SAMUEL5, JOHN4, GODFREY3, ALEXANDER2, JOHN1)9 was born Abt. 17459, and died WFT Est. 1774-18399. She married (1) THOMAS HARVEY9 1768 in Cecil County, Maryland9. He was born WFT Est. 1722-17489, and died WFT Est. 1773-18359. She married (2) JOHN MCCULLOUGH9 Abt. 1769 in Cecil County, Maryland9, son of THOMAS MCCULLOUGH and JANE. He was born Abt. 1748 in Baltimore County, Maryland9, and died 1822 in Adams County, Ohio9. More About JOHN MCCULLOUGH: Fact 1: Died in April or May.9 Marriage Notes for SARAH MCCULLOCH and JOHN MCCULLOUGH: [v09t2400.ftw] Sarah is the daughter of John's father, Thomas', half-brother, Samuel McCulloch. Married in the spring of 1769, and removed to Rockbridge, Virginia on their honeymoon. Children of SARAH MCCULLOCH and JOHN MCCULLOUGH are: i. SARAH7 MCCULLOUGH9, b. WFT Est. 1765-1794, Rockbridge County, Virginia9; d. WFT Est. 1771-18769.

ii. SAMUEL M MCCULLOUGH9, b. WFT Est. 1765-1794, Rockbridge County, Virginia9; d. WFT Est. 1771-18739.

iii. JOHN MCCULLOUGH9, b. WFT Est. 1765-1794, Rockbridge County, Virginia9; d. WFT Est. 1771-18739.

iv. ALEXANDER MCCULLOUGH9, b. WFT Est. 1765-1794, Rockbridge County, Virginia9; d. WFT Est. 1771-18739. 25. v. MARY MCCULLOUGH, b. WFT Est. 1765-1794, Rockbridge County, Virginia; d. WFT Est. 1771-1876. 26.

vi. THOMAS HARVEY MCCULLOUGH, b. 1769, Rockbridge County, Virginia; d. December 23, 1861, Adams County, Ohio.

Trees

• Ancestry Family Tree: http://trees.ancestry.com/pt/AMTCitationRedir.aspx?tid=27284681&pid=104

Acknowledgements

• WikiTree profile McCulloch-81 created through the import of tree.ged on Jun 4, 2011 by Carolyn Living. See the Changes page for the details of edits by Carolyn and others.

Historical Society Of Pennsylvania, Marriages