no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Samuel Mccoy (McKay) Mckay (1734 - 1817)

Samuel Mccoy Mckay formerly McKay
Born in Lanarkshire, Scotlandmap
Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 83 in Amite, Mississippi, United Statesmap
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Amy Mcclain private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 8 Sep 2018
This page has been accessed 994 times.

Biography

Scottish flag
Samuel (McKay) Mckay was born in Scotland.

Samuel was born in 1734. He passed away in 1817. [1]


Sources

  1. Unsourced family tree handed down to Amy Mcclain.
  • Year: 1790; Census Place: Claremont, South Carolina; Series: M637; Roll: 11; Page: 221; Image: 141; Family History Library Film: 0568151
  • Year: 1800; Census Place: Salem, Sumter District, South Carolina; Series: M32; Roll: 49; Page: 611; Image: 191; Family History Library Film: 181424
  • A Compilation of the Original Lists of Protestant Immigrants to South Carolina, 1763-1773 [database on-line].
  • Ancestry.com. Mississippi, U.S., State and Territorial Census Collection, 1792-1866 [database on-line]. Lehi, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2007.

Original data: Mississippi State and Territorial Censuses, 1792-1866. Microfilm V229. 3 rolls. Heritage Quest.

  • Ancestry.com. Mississippi, U.S., Wills and Probate Records, 1780-1982 [database on-line]. Lehi, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2015.

Original data: Mississippi County, District and Probate Courts.

  • Scotch-Irish Migration to South Carolina, 1772 [database on-line].

Acknowledgements

This person was created through the import of Watkins.ged on 04 April 2011.





Is Samuel your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Samuel by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Samuel:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 14

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
From the sources listed, which says he was born in Lanarkshire, Scotland?
posted by Harold Bullock
MacKey-96 and McKay-4840 appear to represent the same person because: No dates or other information on MacKey-96 and not attached to any other profiles. Has been a unmerged match of McKay-4840 for many years. Please consider merging into details on McKay-4840.
posted by Gillian Thomas
McKay-4840 and MacKey-96 are not ready to be merged because: not sure
posted on MacKey-96 (merged) by Amy Mcclain
McKay-4840 and MacKey-96 appear to represent the same person because: same?
posted on MacKey-96 (merged) by Amy Mcclain
McKay-4840 and MacKey-96 are not ready to be merged because: not sure if same?
posted on MacKey-96 (merged) by Amy Mcclain
McKay-4840 and MacKey-96 appear to represent the same person because: they look ok
posted on MacKey-96 (merged) by Amy Mcclain
why did all these ppl go to oskufku oklahoma before they came to settle in arkansas??? Depends on when they went to OK. But probably for the same reason, no one knows how to work pull down menus.
posted by Lynette Jester
Nothing to forgive. We all make mistakes. And I get cranky every now and then. So you have to forgive me for that. I almost tossed my db program for making the same error. Jumping to a different location then where I wanted. And I hate to tell you how many "shared" trees at ancestry have some of my ancestors born in Puerto Rico. They weren't. They were b. in SC.

As for the Jacobites, most were transported to NC. You might be able to find a passenger list. So its a short hop to SC from there. Mississippi opened about 1810 to the western migration push. We needed to control the both sides of the Miss River. The LA Purchase happend in 1803. by controling both sides of the MS R we could then barge supplies upriver and wagon freight them in to the eastern states. It was easier to do that then to attempt going up the mountains. There was a pass on the western side that made this feasible, that wasn't on the eastern side. Up the mountain or thru the mountain??

Before the Purchase, we stayed in trouble with Spain and France over tarrifs in using the Mississippi.

posted by Lynette Jester
Having spent time in the Mackay clan homeland in northern Scotland (Tongue), the vast majority of the Mackays (later spelled McKay) were not Jacobites. In fact many had to emigrate because their neighbors were Jacobites and took a dim view of them supporting Edward Longshanks. The Mackays had no love for England, but they hated the idea of a French Catholic (Bonnie Prince Charlie) on the throne of Scotland even more than they hated England.
posted by Harold Bullock
edited by Harold Bullock
but you sound like me... why did all these ppl go to oskufku oklahoma before they came to settle in arkansas
posted by Amy Mcclain
lol i get ya now... there is a scotland arkansas i guess thats what i figured it was i also am trying to rush thru this so the rest of my family can do the fun stuff like add storys n pics on here so forgive me for rushing thru so quickly
posted by Amy Mcclain
Think about this... WHY, if he was born that far west in 1730s, would he go all the way back to SC to marry and have children born in SC and then make his was west again. However, England transported numerous Scotch Jacobites beginning about 1740 and escalating after 1745 thru

1750s.

posted by Lynette Jester
He was probably born in Scotland. And transported here after the battle of Culloden in 1745. After all, his wife was born in Scotland. It looks like it came from a pull down menu that jumped to the Arkansas location. I've seen it happen to other locations with names similar to other US and Pre US locations, like Carolina, Puerto Rico when it was South Carolina.
posted by Lynette Jester
There was NO Arkansas in 1734. Van Vuren County wasn't establish until 1833. It was part of the Louisiana Colony of France. The LA purchase didn't occur till 1803.
posted by Lynette Jester

M  >  McKay  >  Samuel Mccoy (McKay) Mckay