no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Martha (Mitchell) Womack (1744 - 1782)

Martha Womack formerly Mitchell
Born in Granville District, North Carolinamap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married 31 May 1763 in Granville District, North Carolinamap
Descendants descendants
Died at age 38 in Hancock Landing, Burke, Georgia, United Statesmap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Mike Terry private message [send private message] and Ellen Reeves private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 6 Jan 2012
This page has been accessed 955 times.
U.S. Southern Colonies Project logo
Martha (Mitchell) Womack was a North Carolina colonist.

Contents

Biography

  • Martha was born 4 May, 1744 in Granville Co, North Carolina, to Richard Womack and Nancy Childres. She married Abraham Womack 31 May 1763 in Granville Co, North Carolina. She passed away 1 Dec, 1782 in Granville Co, North Carolina.
  • This writer [Varnell-40] finds no evidence to support the claim that James Mitchell and Elizabeth Beard were the parents of Martha Mitchell.
  • On 31 May 1763 when Abraham was 20, he first married Martha Mitchell in Granville Co., NC.1 Born on 4 Mar 1744. Martha died in Granville Co., NC, on 1 Dec 1782; she was 38[1]

Family Members[2]

  • Birth, death, and other details were collected from the well-documented website of Ann McDonald, QuiltDog, WomackHunter.com[3]. It may not be 100% accurate, but it is as close to accurate as we can attain given the information and sources available to us.
  • This particular profile is an on-going project to document the genealogy of the Abraham Womack family of Hancock Co., Georgia, which Ann McDonald (QuiltDog) started. If you have a problem with a particular entry, please contact the submitter of said entry. This profile is a collaborative work-in-progress, always in need of direct and primary sources. Please contribute sources with your information.

She was the daughter of Robert Mitchell. She passed away about 1872.

Sources

  1. North Carolina, County Marriages, 1762-1979, database with images, FamilySearch, Abraham Womack and Martha Mitchell, 31 May 1763; citing , Granville, North Carolina, United States, p. 115, Office of Archives and History, Division of Archives and Records. State Archive of North Carolina and various county Register of Deeds; FHL microfilm 19,009.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Genealogy.com Womak-KY
  3. [womackhunter.com/Report_2/rr01/rr01_001.htm#P21]
  • Abstracts of the Wills and Estate Records of Granville County, N. C. 1746-1808 by Zae Hargett Gwynn. Published by Joseph W. Watson, 406 Piedmont Ave., Rocky Mount, N. C. 1973. Pages 16-17.
  • Martha Mitchel, "North Carolina, County Marriages, 1762-1979 "[[1]]

Acknowledgments

Mitchell-3144 was started by Ginny Howard on 4 Dec 2013.





Is Martha your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Martha by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Martha:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 7

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Mitchell-32601 and Mitchell-3144 appear to represent the same person because: Potential duplicate - same spouse
posted by Hans Hofmann
Unlinked Edward Mitchell-10191 as father. The memorial indicates that the will of Robert Tyner Mitchell names Martha as one of his children. The Bio for this profile makes reference to parenthood of Richard Womack (he was actually a father-in-law), James Mitchell and Edward Mitchell. The profile of Edward Mitchell does not provide any corroboration that this Martha Mitchell was his child.
posted by Hans Hofmann
Mitchel-269 and Mitchell-10916 appear to represent the same person because: Birth and death dates match; places (especially death) need resolving. Husbands' names match.
posted by Sharon Casteel
Same birthday, same location.

Married same guy, same date.

Died same date, same location.

What am I missing? Hard source trumps soft source?

Mitchell-10916 and Mitchell-3144 do not represent the same person because: Still differences via our differenct sources.
posted by [Living Womack]
Mitchell-3144 and Mitchel-183 appear to represent the same person because: Identical profiles
Womack Mitchell-1 and Mitchell-3144 appear to represent the same person because: GEDCOM error

M  >  Mitchell  |  W  >  Womack  >  Martha (Mitchell) Womack

Categories: North Carolina Colonists