entry for 6 Jan 1717 reads: "sabb: Baptized Janet laull daughter to Alexr Monteith and Elizabeth Monteith in Park witnesses Richard Hendersone & William Napier etc" [1]
Married
Their Banns were proclaimed in Logie parish 31 May 1735.
entry for May 31st 1735, Saturday reads: The which day upon production of a testimonial from Kincardine, Robert Buchanan in the said parish, and Janet Monteith in this parish, enrolled their names here to be proclaimed in order to marriage, and William Bryce in Coldhome became cautioner for their pawnes, which is ten shillings Sterling.[2]
They were married 17 Jul 1735, Kincardine, Perthshire, Scotland.[3] The entry reads:
June 7th, Rob Buchannan, parothnor & Janet Monteath in Logie - marryed 17 July ys year.
Is Janet your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Janet by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Janet:
Monteath-55 and Monteith-559 appear to represent the same person because: Data restored to the original person created for as per change history. This preserves internal and external WikiTree links, which repurposing a profile into a different person entirely doesn't and is very confusing. The original (Monteith-559 and new (Monteath-55) profiles are one and the same person by slightly different surname spellings
Chose whichever last name fits the first documented evidence for the merge.
Chose whichever last name fits the first documented evidence for the merge.