Source: S-2135554142 Title: Ancestry Family Trees Publication: Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: The Generations Network.
Family Data Collection - Individual Records Author: Edmund West, comp. Publication: Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: The Generations Network, Inc., 2000. Note: APID: 1,4725::0
Is John your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with John by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with John:
John and Judith are my 6th great grandparents.
Whether he was born in 1709, 1717, or 1722, he could not possibly be the son of parents born circa 1708.
While it may be presumptuous that William Walker Moore I, of Orange County NC in 1790, was the son of John Moore and Judith Walker, I have seen trees that suggest that is the case. His evident descendant's Y-DNA at 67 STR is a clear match with the descendants of Elijah D Moore b. 1806 NC, who have taken Big-Y and are also believed to be descendants of John Moore and Judith Walker. Until another male descendant with a confident line takes a Big-Y test I believe this to be true: This is a line of Moore families proven by Y-DNA to cluster in Haplogroup R-BY99680, a subset of R-L20 < R-U152. They are not related to the numerous Moore families of R-L21.
Note that this John Moore (and his brother John) were born about six years after his mother and a couple of years before his father. Could John be Robert's brother rather than his son? Thanks for looking into this!
John and Judith are my 6th great grandparents. Whether he was born in 1709, 1717, or 1722, he could not possibly be the son of parents born circa 1708.