no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Edith Mary Neale (abt. 1871)

Edith Mary Neale
Born about in South Ruston, Norfolk, Englandmap
Ancestors ancestors
Sister of [half], [half] and [half]
[spouse(s) unknown]
[children unknown]
Died [date unknown] [location unknown]
Problems/Questions Profile manager: D G Laity Lombardi private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 13 Mar 2016
This page has been accessed 252 times.

Biography

Edith was born 1871. [1]

In 1871, the family were living at South Ruston, Smallburgh, Norfolk, England. The household comprised of Richard, Jane and their daughter Edith Mary (b.1871). [2]

In 1881, the family were living at ?, Sco-Ruston Aka South Ruston, Smallburgh, Norfolk, England. The household comprised of parents George and Jane Neal (Jane born 1844 Sloham, Norfolk). George is a Agricultural Labourer Grocer and Jane is a Manger of the shop. They also have 3 children at home namely Edith (b.1871), Rosa (b.1873) and William (b.1881), these children are born at South Ruston, [3]

In 1891, the family were living at Sco Ruston or South Ruston, Smallburgh, Norfolk, England. The household comprised of parents George and Jane Neale (b.1844 Sloley). The following children were also in the household Edith Mary (b.1871), William George (b.1881), Ethel Mad (b.1883) and Bertha Amelia (b.1885). [4]

In 1901, the family were living at Tunstead Road, Sco Ruston or South Ruston, Smallburgh, Norfolk, England. The household comprised of parents George and Jane (b. 1844 Sloley) and daughter Edith Neale (b. 1871) and grandson Arthur Neale (b.1894 Norwich). [5]

Sources

  1. Birth Registration - www.freebmd.org.uk - GRO Birth Index, Smallburgh, Vol. 4b, Page 45 q March 1871
  2. 1871 UK census - www.findmypast.co.uk - Archive reference RG10, Piece number 1794, Folio 92, Page 3
  3. 1881 UK census - www.findmypast.co.uk - Archive reference RG11, Piece number 1919, Folio 98, Page 1
  4. 1891 UK census - www.findmypast.co.uk - Archive reference RG12, Piece number 1507, Folio 86, Page 2
  5. 1901 UK census - www.findmypast.co.uk - Archive reference RG13, Piece number 1820, Folio 87, Page 19




Is Edith your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Edith by comparing test results with other carriers of her ancestors' mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Edith:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 2

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Neale-1099 and Neale-1096 appear to represent the same person because: As documented in e-mail
posted by Paula (Round) Dea
Neale-1099 and this profile are duplicates; it would appear Edith would be Richard's daughter since George and Jane did not marry until 1879. I have ignored both for the Source-A-Thon. In fact, given I'm sure you have all the relevant source data for the Neales I've not already updated, I'll leave them and do a different family.
posted by Jason Cottrell

N  >  Neale  >  Edith Mary Neale