| Richard North migrated to New England during the Puritan Great Migration (1621-1640). (See The Directory, by R. C. Anderson, p. 242) Join: Puritan Great Migration Project Discuss: pgm |
Contents |
Born about 1590 in Olney, Buckinghamshire, England.[1]
Married first Joan Bartram ("Johane Bartrame") 29 Nov 1610 Olney, Buckinghamshire, England; married second, Ursula ____ probably in Massachusetts, who, according to a later lawsuit, was a stepmother to his children.
May have first appeared in Salisbury on list of those receiving land in the 1639 first division of land (but not on the early copy in the Massachusetts archives, suggesting it may have been added later). Certainly in Massachusetts by 2 Jun 1641 when made a freeman.
Died 01 MAR 1667 in Salisbury, Essex, Massachusetts,[2] survived by his wife, Ursula, who was step-mother to his children. He left a will executed 26 Jan 1648[/9?]; his widow Ursula died 1 Mar 1670[/1?], leaving a will that was challenged in court.
Left a will dated 26 Jan 1648/9, "the authenticity of which was later questioned, left 5 pounds to daughter Mary jones, wife of Thomas Jones; 5 pounds to grandchild Ann Bates, child of daughter Sarah[a]m, 'pvided shee bee aliue att my decease"' to daughter Susanna Martune, wife of George Martyn, 'twenty shillings & the tenn pound sch hir husband the said George Martyn doth owe unto mee for cattle wch he receiued of mee'; and the residue to 'deare & weleeloued wyfe Vrsula North,' who was made executrix. Overseers were Mr. Tho. Bradbury & Richard Wells of Salisbury, who were each to receive ten shillings. The inventory was taken 16 Mar 1667/8. On 24 July 1669, Thomas Jones of Gloucester acknowledged receipt from Ursula North of a legacy given to his wife Mary in the will of her father Richard North of Salisbury, and Francis Bates and wife Ann, formerly Ann Oldum, acknowledged receipt on 4 Oct. 1669 of a legacy given Ann in the will of her grandfather, Richard North (Provate Records of Essex County 2:125-127). No receipt is recorded from the Martins, but it seems that the Joneses and the Bateses had no immediate qualms about the will, at least none that led them to refuse the legacies granted them in it. We infer that they expected to share in the North Property after Ursula's death."
"Then on 1 March 1670[/1?], apparently three years to the day after her husband's death, ursula North died, leaving a will that outraged her husband's daughter's. The will, which was dated 19 May 1668, before the receipts above were signed, left "my gran child" Mare Winslo [Winsley], wife of Nathanial Winslow, 'my dwelling house and lands and meedo and Commenidge... in Salsbury... and unto her dafter Hephzibah after her mothers decease.' Hepzibah Winslow also received 10 pounds to be improved for her until she came of age, while Mary Jones and Susannah Matin each received only forty shillings. The executrix was grandchild Mary Winslo; the oversees: Richard Wells and William Buswell of Salisbury. After signing this will, Ursula North added on 24 Jun 1669 a bequest of 10 pounds to William Buckly, 'which is dew to me from the Said buckley in that bond of thirti pound.' The inventory was taken 16 March 1670/1, and the will was proved 11 2m (April) 1671 (ibid. 222-4). The impression one receives from readhing this will is that Nathaniel and Mary (Jones) Winsley had treated her stepmother in kindly fashion and we may speculate that Susanna Martin and Mary Jones had not been well disposed to their stepmother. The result was that Richard North's daughters received almost nothing, his granddaughter Ann Bates nothing at all, and Mary Jones's daughter, Mary Winsley, got practically the whole estate. The ensuring squabble was unseemly and very public."...
"A record of the Court's judgment does not survive, but the plaintiffs either lost the suit, or were non-suited, and George Martin was required to pay Nathaniel Winsley's court costs. When George did not do so to Winsley's satisfaction, he had is uncle-in-law arrested..."
Martin took the suit against Ursula North's will to the Hampton Quarterly Court in 1673, which concluded the will was legal.
Both suits were appealed. See Court Files #1334, Suffolk County Courthouse. "Several reasons are adumbrated that the will is a forgery all centering on the fact that it is dated 26 Jan. 1648... calls North's granddaughter Ann Bates, even though she did not marry Bates until 1657; and it leaves Susanna a debt owed by her husband to her father-in-law even though that debt had not been contracted when the will was supposedly executed."
"In March 1673/4, the Court of Assistants... sidestepped the question of forgery by deciding that the [Ursula] North will had not been legally proved and by leaving the disposal of North's estate to the Norfolk Co. Court. (Records of the Court of Assistants of the Colony of Massachusetts Bay 1:5 f.)."
The Norfolk Co. Court responded by affirming that the will had indeed been legally proved. (Probate Records of Essex County 2:127) and the Winsleys were apparently left in possession of the property.
Richard was born in 1590. He died in Salisbury on 1 March 1667.[4]
Children, the first two of whom may have been through an earlier, unknown wife:
Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.
Featured National Park champion connections: Richard is 13 degrees from Theodore Roosevelt, 19 degrees from Stephanus Johannes Paulus Kruger, 11 degrees from George Catlin, 16 degrees from Marjory Douglas, 22 degrees from Sueko Embrey, 12 degrees from George Grinnell, 24 degrees from Anton Kröller, 14 degrees from Stephen Mather, 20 degrees from Kara McKean, 14 degrees from John Muir, 15 degrees from Victoria Hanover and 25 degrees from Charles Young on our single family tree. Login to find your connection.
Categories: Puritan Great Migration
If you can provide more detail it would be helpful... and/or a link that any Ancestry members on the PGM Project crew can follow. Thanks.