Fact: Burial Stellawood Cemetery, Durban, Natal, South Africa
Sources
↑ * Family Search: "South Africa, Natal Province, Civil Marriages, 1845-1955," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:KDC5-Q4N : 19 February 2021), John Henry O'Connor and Annie Mary Andrews Hunkin, 16 May 1906; citing Ladysmith, Natal, South Africa; 01067; National Archives and Records Service of South Africa, Pretoria; 1,795,568.
"South Africa, Natal Province, Civil Marriages, 1845-1955," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:KDC5-4TT : 27 December 2014), John Henry O'Connor and Annie Mary Andrews Hunkin, 16 May 1906; citing Ladysmith, Natal, South Africa; 00073; National Archives and Records Service of South Africa, Pretoria; 1,795,569.
↑ * Family Search: "South Africa, Natal Province, Civil Marriages, 1845-1955," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:KDCT-8WF : 19 February 2021), John Henry O'Connor and Cathrine Forbes, 07 Aug 1919; citing Pietermaritzburg, Natal, South Africa; 01367; National Archives and Records Service of South Africa, Pretoria; 1,795,579.
↑ * Family Search: "South Africa, Natal Province, Civil Deaths, 1863-1955," database, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:8TG8-FCZM : 1 November 2020), John Henry O'Conner, 30 Apr 1949; Death, Durban, Ellisras, Transvaal, South Africa, The National Archives of South Africa (NARS), Pretoria; FHL microfilm .
↑ * Family Search: "South Africa, Pietermaritzburg Estate Files 1846-1950," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QPC3-HH9S : 22 August 2019), John Henry O'Connor, 1949; citing Probate, Pietermaritzburg Archives (Formerly Natal State Archives), South Africa.
WikiTree Profile O'Connor-2957 Added By Merryl Hunkin; 28 October 2017
Merged with:
WikiTree Profile O'Connor-5112 Added By Susan O'Connor; 20 September 2020
Is John your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
O'Connor-5112 and O'Connor-2957 appear to represent the same person because: O'Connor-5112 is a duplicate of the earlier created O'Connor-2957 and should be merged into O'Connor-2957. O'Connor-2957 should be the surviving profile.