no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Petrus Oosterhout (bef. 1711 - bef. 1748)

Petrus Oosterhout
Born before in Kingston, Ulster, New Yorkmap
Ancestors ancestors
Husband of — married 5 Oct 1739 (to before Aug 1748) in Kingston, Ulster Co. New Yorkmap
Died before at about age 36 [location unknown]
Problems/Questions Profile manager: New Netherland Settlers WikiTree private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 30 May 2015
This page has been accessed 367 times.
{{{image-caption}}}
Petrus Oosterhout was a New Netherland Descendant 1674-1776.
Join: New Netherland Settlers Project
Discuss: new_netherland
This profile is part of the Oosterhout Name Study.

Contents

Biography

Baptism

2 Dec 1711 Kingston, Ulster, New York[1]

Marriage

5 Oct 1739 Kingston, Ulster, New York[2]

Sources

  1. Hoes, Roswell R. Baptismal and Marriage Records of the Old Dutch Church of Kingston, Ulster County, New York, 1660-1809 (Baltimore, MD: Genealogical Publishing, 1997), p. 96 #1997
  2. Hoes, Roswell R. Baptismal and Marriage Records of the Old Dutch Church of Kingston, Ulster County, New York, 1660-1809 (Baltimore, MD: Genealogical Publishing, 1997), p. 578 #909




Is Petrus your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Petrus by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree: Mitochondrial DNA test-takers in the direct maternal line: It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Petrus:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 3

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
I am leaning toward identifying the husband of Burhans as Oosterhout-12, not this one. My evidence follows.

Identification as husband of Burhans is supported in some related baptism records. Mar. 8 1741 son Petrus was sp by [aunt] Grietje Oosterhout (Hoes #5282). Jan. 25 1747 nephew Abraham Burhans was sp by [aunt-in-law] Elisabeth Burhans. The other sp was [maternal uncle] Abraham Oosterhout (Hoes #5926).

Comments please.

posted by John Balow
More thoughts? I would like to remove Burhans. I confess I don’t (yet) know what happened to this Petrus.
posted by John Balow
Oosterhoudt-12 and Oosterhout-68 do not represent the same person because: Parents are documented; marriage to Burhans may need adjustment
posted by John Balow

Rejected matches › Petrus Oosterhoudt (abt.1710-)