no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Sarah Jane (Osborne) Baker (abt. 1743 - 1806)

Sarah Jane (Jane) Baker formerly Osborne
Born about in Morristown, Morris, New Jersey, British Colonial Americamap
Daughter of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Wife of — married about 11 Jul 1762 in Westfield, Union, NJmap
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 63 in Columbia Township, Hamilton, Ohio, United Statesmap
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Karl Schwendenman private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 26 Oct 2011
This page has been accessed 463 times.

Biography

Sarah was born in 1743. She was the daughter of Henry Osborn and Margaret French. She passed away in 1806.

She married Ephraim Baker Jr on 11 July 1762, in Westfield, Essex, New Jersey, British Colonial America. Their children were Ruth C. Baker (1762–1831), Rhoda Baker (1763–Deceased), David Baker (1765–1834), Prudence Baker (1766–1844), Matthais Baker (1768–1847), John Valentine Baker (1774–1852), Elizabeth Baker (1778–1826), Moses O. Baker (1778–Deceased), Ephraim Valentine Baker Sr. (1779–1845), Sarah Baker (1782–1858), Prudence Baker (1786–1872) and Jane Baker (1787–1859).

Jane passed away in 1806 in Columbia Township, Hamilton, Ohio followed with burial at the Fulton-Presbyterian Cemetery in Fulton, Hamilton County, Ohio.

Sources

  • Sarah Jane “Jane” Osborne Baker BIRTH 1743 Morristown, Morris County, New Jersey, USA DEATH 1806 (aged 62–63) Columbia, Hamilton County, Ohio, USA BURIAL Fulton-Presbyterian Cemetery, Fulton, Hamilton County, Ohio, USA MEMORIAL ID 177742520.[1]




Is Jane your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Jane's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 4

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Baker-32097 and Osborne-1044 do not represent the same person because: Not the same. These are husband & wife.
posted by Mitchell Wilcox
Osborne-3708 and Osborne-1044 are not ready to be merged because: There were too many Osborne families in bot h areas, and they do not match that closely.I have looked at this in the past, and found too many inconsistent items to call it a match. Show me something that explains why, and I'd be happy to merge, but don't see it.
posted by Karl Schwendenman
Osborne-3708 and Osborne-1044 are not ready to be merged because: Needs more research - details are similar but many are not the same.
posted by Martha Mason
Osborne-3708 and Osborne-1044 appear to represent the same person because: Duplicate

O  >  Osborne  |  B  >  Baker  >  Sarah Jane (Osborne) Baker

Categories: Fulton-Presbyterian Cemetery, Fulton, Ohio