"United States Census, 1860," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MHDR-5Q4 : accessed 18 July 2015), Catharine Hall, Division No 4, Jackson, Alabama, United States; from "1860 U.S. Federal Census - Population," database, Fold3.com (http://www.fold3.com : n.d.); citing p. 69, household ID 475, NARA microfilm publication M653 (Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.); FHL microfilm 803,011.
"United States Census, 1870," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MHK8-N86 : accessed 18 July 2015), Catherine Shelton in household of Noah Shelton, Alabama, United States; citing p. 16, family 121, NARA microfilm publication M593 (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.); FHL microfilm 545,519.
Son's death record names parents: "Alabama Deaths, 1908-1974," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:JDKF-T8H : 27 November 2014), Manoah Hall in entry for Jonathan B. Hall, 15 Mar 1921; citing reference cn 4595, Department of Health, Montgomery; FHL microfilm 1,908,228.
Is Catherine your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate, or
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Catherine by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share DNA with Catherine:
I Agree with Merge suggestion. I will try to find some evidence as well. Catherine Pace Hall Shelton was 3rd great grandmother. my family records show marriage date of 1842, Manoah passed before 1860. She then marries Noah Shelton, they have a blended family. my Grandfather S.C (Sol Hall) shows in one census, then later with his grandparents Billy Pace and Liz Winiger Pace.
Pace-2396 and Pace-4 appear to represent the same person because: Individual has same birth date and birth place. One spouse is same as the one of the spouses in the other profile. The one without the other spouse has the missing spouse's surname as one of her alternate surnames. Only thing I am seeing different is the birth year. on one it is in 1890 and the other 1898 which could be possibly a transcription error. A Merge should occur and the source for death should be looked at to determine the right year or a notation should be made to state it could be either of those years in the merged profile.