Have you taken a DNA test for genealogy? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.
On 15 Aug 2018 at 10:35 GMT Carl Savard wrote:
I don't these Ouellet are the same person.
On 22 May 2018 at 10:51 GMT C. Mackinnon wrote:
On 11 Jan 2018 at 17:22 GMT Wendy (Ling) Sullivan wrote:
On 2 Jan 2018 at 16:46 GMT Guy Constantineau wrote:
Wish you a Happy New Year. May 2018 bring you all you need to be happy.
Congratulation for adding your contributions in December. Whatever the quantity of your contributions, they all count. As I always say "Quality is better than quantity" to make a great family tree.
Thank you for being a Wikitreer,
Guy Constantineau - Wikitree leader
On 17 Nov 2017 at 01:37 GMT Guy Constantineau wrote:
as a member of Quebecois Project, could you change the place names on as per our standards on the profiles you manage.
or help us by choosing a letter in our To-Do-List here...
Guy Quebecois Project Leader
On 6 Nov 2017 at 16:43 GMT Pierre Chevrier wrote:
On 10 Oct 2017 at 04:59 GMT Isabelle Rassinot wrote:
Being from the other side of the pond and not familiar with quebecois genealogy I could not tell how good the genealogiequebecinfo is, but the absence of visible source is not promising. It is of small weight compared to Pierre d'Hozier's armorial. The evidence from http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~louislarocque/nobilitee.htm and the letter from Pierre Dupouey linked from there are pretty damning for this family group. In addition the Couillaud/Roquebrune are nothing like either the Hauteclaire or the Larroque-Ordan arms. And we know he was completely illiterate, which would be very strange for a nobleman at the time.
On 4 Oct 2017 at 21:27 GMT Isabelle Rassinot wrote:
On 26 Sep 2017 at 19:33 GMT Isabelle Rassinot wrote:
I see you've been suggesting sources on profiles (Joyeuse family), that's great ! Wikitree is very fond of primary sources (that is, contemporary documents), and if not, good secondary sources (the work of researchers who had access to primary sources and reference them in their work) - and that is especially true for the Pre-1500 projects. You would probably like to visit the Pre-1500 Resource Page to see a list of good sources (also not-so-good sources have been listed). Most of these sources are also very good for 1500-1800 work. Enjoy !
On 26 Sep 2017 at 06:07 GMT Isabelle Rassinot wrote: