no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Ruth (Peck) Culver (abt. 1688 - abt. 1760)

Ruth Culver formerly Peck aka Sedgwick
Born about in Hartford, Hartford, Connecticutmap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married 1 Feb 1710 in Hartford, Connecticutmap
Wife of — married 3 Jan 1728 in Wallingford, New Haven, Connecticutmap
Descendants descendants
Died about at about age 72 in Wallingford, New Haven, Connecticutmap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Sandy Culver private message [send private message] and Ellen Conn private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 8 Dec 2014
This page has been accessed 405 times.

Biography

Ruth Peck, daughter of Paul and Elizabeth (Baisey) Peck of Hartford, was baptized 3 Jun 1688 at Hartford, Connecticut.[1]
Ruth Peck married first, at Hartford, Samuel Sedgwick, on 1 Feb 1711. [1]
Ruth (Peck) Sedgwick married second, Samuel Culver, on 3 Jan 1728, recorded at Wallingford, Connecticut.[1]
Ruth (Peck) (Sedgwick) Culver died and was buried at Wallingford on 27 Oct 1760 in the 76th year of her age.[1]

Sources

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 The Family of Paul Peck, of Hartford, Connecticut, by Donald Lines Jacobus, TAG Vol 9, (1932) page 87
  • Jacobus, Donald Lines, The Family of Paul Peck, of Hartford, Connecticut, The American Genealogist. New Haven, CT: D. L. Jacobus, 1937-. (Online database. AmericanAncestors.org. New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2009 - .) TAG Vol 9 (1932), page 87




Is Ruth your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Ruth by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Ruth:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 1

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Peck-6292 and Peck-2610 appear to represent the same person because: The sources on the 6292 profile are complete and accurate. There is no evidence that this Ruth Peck was ever married one Jasper Griffin, thus, the aka of Griffin should be disregarded. This merge will connect potential DNA relatives, which is always a bonus!
posted by Robin (Felch) Wedertz

P  >  Peck  |  C  >  Culver  >  Ruth (Peck) Culver