Mary Patteson was listed in the Buckingham County Land Tax Lists from 1782 until 1793 charged for 597 acres. Thereafter her estate appears until 1804, when the tract passed to John Patteson.[2]
Deeds
3 Dec 1763, David & Mary Patteson of Tillotson Parish, Buckingham to James London, £20, 400 acres north side of Fluvanna, granted to David Patteson
witnesses: James Dillard, Jesse Evans, Moses London, Charles Perrow
Order from George Seaton, clerk of Amherst to justices from Buckingham: John Staples, Jeremiah Whitney, and Charles Patteson.
6 Sep 1768, David & Mary Patteson of Buckingham to Nelson & James Patteson, orphans of James Patteson, late of Chesterfield; James in his lifetime bought 400 acres on the North Side of the Fluvanna River, surveyed lately by William Cabell, surveyor for Amherst County, no deed had been made. James Patteson left a will recorded in Chesterfield and gave Nelson the 400 acres, but with the reservation that if wife thought herself with child and brought forth a son, then this son should have equal part with Nelson. After James' death, his wife delivered James Anderson Patteson, and deed made in compliance with their father's wishes.
Witnesses: Charles Patteson, William Phelps, David Via
Commission to Joseph Cabell, Benjamin Howell, and Charles Patteson, JP's of Buckingham to examine Mary Patteson, 15 Feb; done 3 Apr 1769[4]
↑ The Deeds of Amherst County Virginia 1761-1807 and Albemarle County, Virginia 1748-1763, Bailey F. Davis, Southern Historical Press, Greenville, SC, 1979, p. 279, (Amherst DB A:394)
↑ The Deeds of Amherst County Virginia 1761-1807 and Albemarle County, Virginia 1748-1763, Bailey F. Davis, Southern Historical Press, Greenville, SC, 1979, p. 112, (Amherst DB B:394)
Acknowledgments
This person was created through the import of LaBach Family TreeApril28_2011.ged on 05 May 2011.
Is Mary your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Mary by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Mary:
Phelps-10310 and Phelps-484 appear to represent the same person because: Hello,
I created Phelps-10310 because Phelps-484 didn't appear in the suggested list of matches. I adjusted the birth date for Phelps-484, as it was too late for her known children. Please accept the merge. Thanks!
I created Phelps-10310 because Phelps-484 didn't appear in the suggested list of matches. I adjusted the birth date for Phelps-484, as it was too late for her known children. Please accept the merge. Thanks!