Scholastique Poirier born in about 1768, she was the daughter of Joseph Poirier, "maitre cannonier a bord d'un corsaire français" who died in Tintamarre about 1779. Her mother was Marguerite Lavigne. She married Jean Doiron of Rustico in about 1786.
Children of Jean Charles Doiron and Scholastique Poirier[14]
1) Joachim dit Joshua, b. about 1791, married Julie Pineau on 8 Jan 1817
2) Laurent, married Madeleine Pineau on 10 Jan 1815
3) Fabien, married Barbe Pineau on 18 Sep 1820
4) Joseph, celibate
5) Louise, married Francois Pitre on 8 Jan 1817
6) Victoire, married Firmin Blacquiere on 28 Nov 1821
7) Barbe dite Babee, born about 1805, married Joseph Gallant about 1825
8 ) Judith, married Simon Martin on 22 Apr 1823
9) Jean, born about Jan 1809. Married Marguerite Pitre on 22 Oct 1832 and Henriette Gallant on 24 Nov 1846
10) Apolline, born about 1809, married Lazare Gallant about 1828. Died 4 Oct 1889 in Mont-Carmel, PEI
11) Margerite, married Joseph Blacquiere on 7 Jan 1833
12) Unnamed daughter, died 4 Jun 1813 and buried 2 days later on the 6th
13) Madeleine, b/bp. 2/11 Sep 1814, married Isidore dit Blind Pitre on 29 Oct 1838
14) Marie, married John Rogers on 18 Oct 1842
Mtdna Results
Scholastique Poirier is maternal direct line Descendant of Marie Christine Aubois/Hautbois w Mtdna determined to be of (Mi'Kmaq) Native Origin, this line is verified thru the test results and doc. ancestral trail shown here - [15] both Mother- Marie Aubois Mi'Kmaq and Daughter- Anne m. Jean Clemenceau Mi'Kmaq designations can be seen here- [16]
Sources
↑ Ancestry.com. U.S. and Canada, Miscellaneous French Records (Drouin Collection), 1651-1941 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2007.
Original data: Gabriel Drouin, comp. Drouin Collection. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Institut Généalogique Drouin. Papiers (familles) de Placide Gaudet, Image 11 and 12 of 8365. Poirier Family Ancestry (paid subscription)
↑ "Prince Edward Island Death Card Index, 1721-1905," database with images, FamilySearch [1] : 11 March 2018, Scholastique Poirier, 1867; citing 1867, , Prince Edward Island, Canada, Division of Vital Statistics. Public Archives, Charlottetown; FHL microfilm 1,487,744.
↑ Bernard, Jean. Généalogie des familles acadiennes de l'Île-du-Prince-Édouard, c. 1764 - c. 1900, Baie de Malpèque, Î.-P.-É, 2009, Volume 3 C-F, pages 1519-1520
↑ Ancestry of Emile Broome, Mtdna results for Emiles line from Victoire Doiron m. Jean Charles Doiron., Scholastique Poirier + Jean Charles Doiron
Victoire Doiron + Firmin Blaquiere,[2],
↑ Register, RG 1 volume 26 page 279, Priest- Justinien Durand, Reg. Date-3 March 1703, Event- Marriage, Groom- Jean ClemenceauNova Scotia Archives, An Acadian Parish Remembered, [3]
Georges Arsenault, “The Saga of Alexis Doiron” at www.acadian-home.org/George-saga-alexis-doiron.html
Repository: R1 Ancestry.com
Source: S21 Yates Publishing U.S. and International Marriage Records, 1560-1900 Publication: Name: Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2004.Original data - This unique collection of records was extracted from a variety of sources including family group sheets and electronic databases. Originally, the information was derived; Repository: #R1
Source: S26 Ancestry.com Acadia, Canada, Vital and Church Records (Drouin Collection), 1670-1946 Publication: Name: Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2007.Original data - Gabriel Drouin, comp. Drouin Collection. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Institut Généalogique Drouin.Original data: Gabriel Drouin, comp. Drouin Collection. Montreal, Quebec,; Repository: #R1
Source: S70 Ancestry Family Trees Publication: Name: Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com. Original data: Family Tree files submitted by Ancestry members.; Repository: #R1
Is Scholastique your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Scholastique by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
Mitochondrial DNA test-takers in the direct maternal line:
Poirier-2636 and Poirier-107 appear to represent the same person because: Same date of birth, same parents, same spouse, same son Laurent based on reference Généalogie acadienne in Poirier-2636.
I have an Ancestry subscription. I tracked through the x-ref’d family trees. The only one that seemed to have decent documentation turned out to be quite useless. The key items in the citations turned out to “unhelpful.”
The source I trust most is Jean Bernard’s collection for PEI, which is based on careful search of parish records and the like, plus the unpublished updated notes of Stephen A. White. There, Scholastique (shown both in her husband’s and her father’s listings) has no birth or death dates, but has White’s estimate that she married about 1786 to Jean Charles Doiron – which is what Georges Arsenault has as well in his article on “The Saga of Alexis Doiron” (father of J-C). It was Arsenault’s piece that led me to create a profile for J-C Doiron and for Scholastique in the first place.
Bernard shows the 13th of Scholastique’s 14 kids (Marguerite) as born on the 2 of Sep 1814 & baptized on the 11th (from the Rustico parish register). Even if Schol. was b. in 1768, she’s have been about 45 at the time of that birth. If b. 1762, she’d have been c 52….
When Marguerite married in 1838, neither parent was marked as deceased (it was the practice to do so).
Scholastique & her husband are listed in the 1798 census of Rustico (published in J-Henri Blanchard’s history of the parish), but with no ages given.
This is all I can give you. Most of the stuff in the profile, I had nothing to do with placing there.
As for the Métis thing, I have to confess that I’m in the camp that objects strongly to the misappropriation of the word “Métis” by persons of “mixed” Euro-aboriginal ancestry outside of the population of Métis proper in the “North West” of Canada and north-central USA, who have a distinct historical identity and culture. I think it’s superb to be interested in, and proud of, First Nations ancestry (I wish I had some, frankly), but the label “Métis” (regardless of its literal meaning in French) is politically and culturally laden with connotations that should be respected. As well, I am severely uninformed about DNA results in terms of genealogy, so I can’t offer any advice on that score. Sorry about the “Métis” rant – nothing personal!
Hi, John, should we change the birth year to 1768 as said in the profile? I can't review the Ancestry entries but as they are family trees, I'm not optimistic that there is an actual source for either date. At least 99 years old at death could be more realistic than 105. That card about death looks a little unofficial to me but could be true?
Also do you agree with the info in the DNA link provided? At the bottom of that page gives the lineage, which is all correctly linked in Wikitree. Should the children all get the Metis sticker?
I would not be optimistic about finding an answer. Any time that a profile is based on family trees & other privately contributed material, alarm bells should go off. I tried following up on some of these links (thru ancestry.ca) & found endlessly copied & reposted misinformation without solid source citation. (Mind you, I abandoned the effort before looking at ALL of them.)
I have an Ancestry subscription. I tracked through the x-ref’d family trees. The only one that seemed to have decent documentation turned out to be quite useless. The key items in the citations turned out to “unhelpful.” The source I trust most is Jean Bernard’s collection for PEI, which is based on careful search of parish records and the like, plus the unpublished updated notes of Stephen A. White. There, Scholastique (shown both in her husband’s and her father’s listings) has no birth or death dates, but has White’s estimate that she married about 1786 to Jean Charles Doiron – which is what Georges Arsenault has as well in his article on “The Saga of Alexis Doiron” (father of J-C). It was Arsenault’s piece that led me to create a profile for J-C Doiron and for Scholastique in the first place. Bernard shows the 13th of Scholastique’s 14 kids (Marguerite) as born on the 2 of Sep 1814 & baptized on the 11th (from the Rustico parish register). Even if Schol. was b. in 1768, she’s have been about 45 at the time of that birth. If b. 1762, she’d have been c 52…. When Marguerite married in 1838, neither parent was marked as deceased (it was the practice to do so). Scholastique & her husband are listed in the 1798 census of Rustico (published in J-Henri Blanchard’s history of the parish), but with no ages given. This is all I can give you. Most of the stuff in the profile, I had nothing to do with placing there. As for the Métis thing, I have to confess that I’m in the camp that objects strongly to the misappropriation of the word “Métis” by persons of “mixed” Euro-aboriginal ancestry outside of the population of Métis proper in the “North West” of Canada and north-central USA, who have a distinct historical identity and culture. I think it’s superb to be interested in, and proud of, First Nations ancestry (I wish I had some, frankly), but the label “Métis” (regardless of its literal meaning in French) is politically and culturally laden with connotations that should be respected. As well, I am severely uninformed about DNA results in terms of genealogy, so I can’t offer any advice on that score. Sorry about the “Métis” rant – nothing personal!
Also do you agree with the info in the DNA link provided? At the bottom of that page gives the lineage, which is all correctly linked in Wikitree. Should the children all get the Metis sticker?
Thanks for your opinion. Cindy