no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

John (Pole) de la Pole (abt. 1341 - bef. 1380)

Sir John de la Pole formerly Pole
Born about in Newborough, Staffordshire, Englandmap
Ancestors ancestors
Husband of — married 21 Oct 1362 in Englandmap [uncertain]
Descendants descendants
Died before before about age 39 in Chrishall, Essex, Englandmap
Problems/Questions
Profile last modified | Created 4 Oct 2011
This page has been accessed 4,037 times.

Biography

Sir John de la Pole (c.1447-9 March 1380) was the son and heir of Sir William de la Pole, the nephew of his more famous uncle William de la Pole,[1] by Margaret daughter of Sir Edmund Peverel. Sir John married Joan Cobham by contract dated 21 Oct 1362. [2]
They had one daughter, Joan who succeeded as Baroness Cobham and married Sir John Oldcastle. [2]
Sir John de la Pole died shortly before 9 March 1380.His widow, Joan [Cobham], died before Jan. 1393/4.[2] They were buried at Chrishall, Essex" [3]

Note

Ancestor of Haute Wyatt, Gateway Ancestor and Colonial immigrant England to Virginia

Sources

  1. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Pole,_William_de_la_(d.1366)_(DNB00)
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Magna Carta Ancestry: A Study in Colonial and Medieval Families Vol IV, page 377
  3. Magna Carta Ancestry: A Study in Colonial and Medieval Families Vol IV, page 377
See also:
  • Richardson, Magna Carta Ancestry, (2011), Douglas Richardson, Magna Carta Ancestry: A Study in Colonial and Medieval Families, Royal Ancestry series, 2nd edition, 4 vols., ed. Kimball G. Everingham, (Salt Lake City, Utah: the author, 2011), volume IV, page 377 #8
  • Douglas Richardson, Royal Ancestry, Volume 5, page 405.




Is John your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of John's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 6

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
A note for the pending merge, his father should be Pole-237 not Pole-39.
posted by Kirk Hess
Pole-116 and Pole-87 appear to represent the same person because: Pole-116 has the wrong father because his father William is often confused with his much more famous uncle of the same name. I've corrected -87's parents, I cannot correct -116 because it is PPP - I'm a little surprised this was missed in the MC review process and its been over a year of 'research' since the last merge attempt.
posted by Kirk Hess
Pole-116 and Pole-153, currently set as unmerged match, are ready to be merged.
Pole-116 and Pole-153, currently set as unmerged match, are ready to be merged.
Pole-116 and Pole-87 are not ready to be merged because: Different mothers - needs further research.
posted by Tim Perry
Pending merge that default approved today proposed by Matchbot.

Similiar info but moter's are different. Pole-116 and Pole-87

P  >  Pole  |  D  >  de la Pole  >  John (Pole) de la Pole