no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

James Porter (abt. 1627)

James Porter
Born about in Felsted, Essex, Englandmap [uncertain]
Ancestors ancestors
Husband of — married 1673 [location unknown]
Husband of — married 15 Jan 1697 in , Windsor, Hartford, Connecticutmap
[children unknown]
Died [date unknown] [location unknown]
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Lora Koch private message [send private message] and Bonnie Nilsen private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 13 Sep 2010
This page has been accessed 909 times.

Biography

Bpt. 20 Feb 1627 at Felsted, Essex. He was named in his fathers 1648 will.[1]

Probably a record for another James: James, s. John, Sr. , m. Sarah Tudor, d. Owen, Jan. 15, 1697, by Mr. Wolcott[2]

Sources

  1. Holman, Winifred Lovering, "John Porter of Windsor" in The American Genealogist. New Haven, CT: D. L. Jacobus. New England Historic Genealogical Society. Vol. 16, 1939, pp. 49-52. AmericanAncestors.org($) (see Notes, p. 122)
  2. Connecticut: Vital Records (The Barbour Collection), 1630-1870 (Online Database: AmericanAncestors.org, New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2011.) From original typescripts, Lucius Barnes Barbour Collection, 1928. https://www.americanancestors.org/DB414/i/12316/238/138421748




Is James your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of James's ancestors' DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 5

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Wives are probably incorrect. See Anne B's comment below
posted by Traci Thiessen
Porter-366 and Porter-154 appear to represent the same person because: Duplicate info
posted by Bonnie Nilsen
This profile may be very confused. The 1622/1628 bpt belongs to Porter-154. The marriage to Sarah Tudor belongs to Porter-1793. The death in England seems unusual. There is a death recorded for a James 29 Sep 1727 in Windsor. And I have no idea whether the to Elizabeth Baldwin is correct. I think some more research should be done on this person etc.
posted on Porter-366 (merged) by Anne B
Porter-366 and Porter-154 do not represent the same person because: Actually I think Porter-366 is son of John, son of John
posted by Anne B
Porter-366 and Porter-154 appear to represent the same person because: ONly one james born to this couple
posted by Anne B

P  >  Porter  >  James Porter