Sarah Potter was born on December 11, 1685, in Ipswich, Massachusetts. She was the daughter of John and Sarah Potter.[1][2] Sarah married first John Rust on September 26, 1705, in Ipswich.[3][4]
She married second Jonathan Fellows, intention published 29th of 10th month (December), 1716, in Ipswich.[5]
↑ "Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001", , FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:DCY4-QL2M : Sat Mar 09 14:40:24 UTC 2024), Entry for Sarah Potter and John Potter, 11 December 1685.
↑ "Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001", , FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QG1V-YZYS : Mon Mar 11 01:45:07 UTC 2024), Entry for John Rust and Sarah Potter, 28 July 1705.
↑ "Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001", , FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QG1V-B5QC : Thu Mar 07 23:28:29 UTC 2024), Entry for John Rust and Sarah Potter, 26 September 1705.
↑ "Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001", , FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QG1V-YZXZ : Sun Mar 10 11:05:17 UTC 2024), Entry for Sarah Fellows and Jonathan Fellows, 30 May 1725.
↑ "Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001", , FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QG1V-TVX3 : Mon Mar 11 00:36:07 UTC 2024), Entry for Sarah Fellows and Jonathan Fellows, 30 May 1725.
The Essex Institute, Vital Records of Ipswich, Massachusetts to the End of the Year 1849 Volume I. - Births (Salem, Mass.: 1910), p. 304.
The Essex Institute, Vital Records of Ipswich, Massachusetts to the End of the Year 1849 Volume II. - Marriages and Deaths (Salem, Mass.: 1910), pp. 379, 380, 553.
Is Sarah your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Sarah by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Sarah: