Susan (Rawlins) Coleman
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Susan (Rawlins) Coleman (bef. 1605 - 1650)

Susan Coleman formerly Rawlins aka Butler, Raulines [uncertain]
Born before in Bromham, Wiltshire, Englandmap
Daughter of [uncertain] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Wife of — married 24 Nov 1623 in Wootton Rivers, Wiltshire, Englandmap
Descendants descendants
Died after age 45 in Newbury, Essex, Massachusetts Bay Colonymap
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Puritan Great Migration Project WikiTree private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 2 Apr 2014
This page has been accessed 1,173 times.
The Puritan Great Migration.
Susan (Rawlins) Coleman migrated to New England during the Puritan Great Migration (1621-1640).
Join: Puritan Great Migration Project
Discuss: pgm

Biography

Susan Raulins is probably the Susan baptised on 14 April 1605 in Bromham to William Rawlins alias Butler and his wife Mary Rawlins alias Butler.[1][2]

Susan married Thomas Colman on 24 November 1623 in Wootten Rivers.[3]

Susan passed away on 17 November 1650 in Newbury, Essex, Massachusetts.[4]

Research Notes

  • Susanna's marriage record refers to her as 'Susan Raulens'.[3]
  • There was also a Susan Rawlins baptised on 14 October 1604 to a Richard Rawlings.[5] Further research may be necessary to confirm Susan's parentage, although for now, Bromham is technically closer to Wootten Rivers than Corsham (38 vs 45 minute drive).

Sources

  1. "Wiltshire, England, Church of England Baptisms, Marriages and Burials, 1538-1812", database, Ancestry (Ancestry Record 61187 #2842278 : accessed 11 January 2024) [requires subscription], Susan Rawlins, daughter of Willm Rawlins, baptised on 14 April 1605 in Bromham, Wiltshire, England.
  2. Great Migration 1634-1635, C-F. (Online database. AmericanAncestors.org. New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2008.) Originally published as: The Great Migration, Immigrants to New England, 1634-1635, Volume II, C-F, by Robert Charles Anderson, George F. Sanborn, Jr., and Melinde Lutz Sanborn. Boston: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2001. [also found at Ancestry.com - see next] This article refers to Thos. Coleman of Newbury, Hampton, and Nantucket. Thomas Coleman in Great Migration
  3. 3.0 3.1 "Wiltshire, England, Church of England Baptisms, Marriages and Burials, 1538-1812", database, Ancestry (Ancestry Record 61187 #3002709 : accessed 11 January 2024) [requires subscription], Thomas Collman married Susan Kaulmes on 24 November 1623 in Wootton Rivers, Wiltshire, England.
  4. "Massachusetts, U.S., Town and Vital Records, 1620-1988", database, Ancestry (Ancestry Record 2495 #80505876 : accessed 11 January 2024) [requires subscription], Susanna S Coleman, the wife of Thomas Coleman, passed away on 17 November 1640 in Newbury, Massachusetts, USA.
  5. Wiltshire Baptisms Index 1530-1917", FindMyPast. First name(s): Suzan; Last name: Rawlings; Baptism year: 1604; Baptism date: 14 Oct 1604; Father's first name(s): Richard; Father's last name: Rawlings; Place: Corsham; County: Wiltshire; Country: England. https://www.findmypast.co.uk/transcript?id=PRS%2FWILT%2FBAPS%2FBH%2F1088862.

See also:

  • The New England Historical and Genealogical Register. Boston, MA: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 1847-. (Online database: AmericanAncestors.org, New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2001-2013.) Coleman family, Joshua Coffin, Vol. 11, page 347




Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Susan's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 16

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Hi, would you mind adding William Rawlins as Susan's father?
posted by O Butler
Added, thank you for your work.
posted by Bobbie (Madison) Hall
As I've already mentioned, I viewed the scanned copy of the parish record for the marriage, and the name was spelled Raulmes. I've posted the scan on the G2G post. Please comment there . . .
Anne, I think the TAG article that says the author found the marriage at Wooten, Rivers, Wiltshire (recorded as Susan Raulines) is referring to Volume 2 p 1727, of the Tillotson Book being reviewed. But you are correct, as I don't have the actual book, to see the source beyond TAG's review. Sorry about that.
posted by Chris Hoyt
I've ppp'd the other profile also, so it won't merge, until we continue to hash this out. I searched Ancestry, FamSearch and FreeReg. Wooton Rivers doesn't seem to be indexed. I didn't come up with any hits (well one) for the spelling Raulines in Wiltshire, but plenty of Rawlins. We don't have her birth record. So maybe this is a case where we --- "Nevertheless, if there are any contemporary written documents, the spelling from those documents should be used. In particular, the spelling that appears in a birth record should be used for the Last Name at Birth unless there are other documents from at or near the time of birth that inform us about a more common or correct spelling."
posted by Anne B
Chris, the TAG link you listed re: Raulines doesn't have a reference to Raulines. and using that spelling only gets two hits on NEHGS that are both for Great Migration articles.
posted by Anne B
Yes, Patricia, we realize that. What we try to do on Wikitree is use the spelling that is most consistent with the records.
It's well to remember that back then people just did not care how they spelled the name. A person could spell his own name three different ways in the same document! There was NO CORRECT spelling!!! It was all pretty much phonetic -- & that permitted a multitude of sins!  :-)
posted by [Living Prickett]
We perhaps should move the discussion to G2G . . .
I personally try to determine what the spelling actually was. In this case, judging by the bulk of the Wiltshire records spelling that particular family name as Rawlins, that would be my tendency. The parish marriage record names them Thomas Collman and Susan Raulmes (and we know that's not right). If you have an ancestry paid account, you can view the actual record (which I did). So in actuality, I haven't seen a parish register with the spelling Raulines . . . As to birth, we aren't sure of her parents, but the two noted are spelled Rawlins and Rawlings. As mentioned, when searching the Wiltshire parish register, the bulk of Rawlins is spelled that way . . .

As such, I would lean towards a LNAB of Rawlins with OLN as Raulines.

Darlene, we typically do go with the spelling of the parish record (birth or baptism) . And add on that this is the spelling that Anderson used as well, that's additional weight for LNAB = Raulines. We've got Rawlins as OLN.
posted by Jillaine Smith
OK, but the parish register spelling doesn't mean that's the way it was actually spelled. Do we have any records from Wiltshire as to a Rawlins, Rawlings, or Raulines family? I located a burial record for a William Rawlins in 1608 in Bromham, Wiltshire (ref: Wiltshire and Swindon History Centre; Chippenham, Wiltshire, England; Wiltshire Parish Registers; Reference Number: 518/3)

Searching through the Wiltshire, England, Church of England Baptisms, Marriages and Burials, 1538-1812, focusing on Bromham, the majority of the time the surname is shown as Rawlins.