no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Robert Francis Reeves (1580 - 1638)

Robert Francis Reeves
Born in Caldercote, Northamptonshire, , Englandmap
Ancestors ancestors
Brother of [half], [half], [half], and [half]
Husband of — married 3 Aug 1608 in Northamptonshire, Englandmap
Descendants descendants
Died at age 58 in Northamptonshire, Englandmap
Profile last modified | Created 24 Jan 2013
This page has been accessed 2,350 times.

Biography

Cross of St George
Robert Reeves was born in England.

Robert was born in 1580. Robert Reeves was the son of William Reeves and Rose Armyger ... He passed away in 1638. [1]

Robert was buried on 21 May 1638 in Dunchurch, Warwickshire, England.[2]

Sources

  1. https://longislandsurnames.com/getperson.php?personID=I3792&tree=Hubbs
  2. Burial: "England, Warwickshire, Parish Registers, 1535-1963"
    citing , p. , Warwick County Record Office, England; FHL microfilm 548,402
    FamilySearch Record: VHXC-Q2V (accessed 16 August 2023)
    FamilySearch Image: S3HT-DZKQ-MCZ Image number 00091
    Robert Reeve burial on 21 May 1638 in Dunchurch, Warwickshire, England.




Is Robert your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Robert by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 18

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Why is the man alleged to have been born in Northamptonshire when their connected ancestors were a hundred miles away in Suffolk and Essex?
posted by Isaac Taylor
Hi Alexander, I would like to finalise the merge of this profile with Reeves-1077. To facilitate this, please could you add the sources that you have for the birth, death and marriage for this person. I note that the two profiles for Robert Reeves both have the same parents and are born in the same year, so they need to be merged. Thanks so much. Gillian, Leader and Arborist, England Project.
posted by Gillian Thomas
Hi Robert and X, please could you have the sources that you have for the birth, death and marriage of Robert Reeves. I note they both currently have the same parents and are born in the same year. Many thanks!
posted by Gillian Thomas
Reeves-1498 and Reeves-1077 are not ready to be merged because: An unmatched merge is appropriate until sources for of birth, death, and spouse data can be substantiated and reconciled.
posted by Alexander Hunter Jr.
Reeves-1498 and Reeves-1077 appear to represent the same person because: These two profiles need to be merged. Both have the same parents, and born in the same year. No sources on either for locations of birth and death, so alternatives can be noted. Wives and children will need to be assessed separately anyway and can be detached if incorrect. Please merge. Thanks
posted by Gillian Thomas
Reeves-1498 and Reeves-1077 are not ready to be merged because: Neither profile is sourced and both profiles have differing birth and death places though both claim to be the son of the same parents. They also have different spouses. Some one needs to work sourcing the profiles before attempting to merge them.
posted by David Hughey Ph.D.
Reeves-1498 and Reeves-1077 appear to represent the same person because: Data Doctor

Clear Duplicate

posted by Andrea (Stawski) Pack
Reeves-1077 and Reeve-644 appear to represent the same person because: Dates of birth, marriage, and death match. Family members do not. Likely a match but need review.
posted by Karen (Kraus) Harbert
I suggest that Reeves-1498 and Reeves-1077 remain an unmerged match at this time due to the differences of birth and death locations. If the merge is completed at this time, it would create a tangled web of confusion. We've seen too much of this at ancestry, rootsweb already and even at WT in trying to sort the Mortons, Teagues and Thorntons. If any arborist or PM has an issue with this, please contact me, Jester-173
posted by Lynette Jester
I suggest that Reeves-1498 and Reeves-1077 remain an unmerged match at this time due to the differences of birth and death locations. If the merge is completed at this time, it would create a tangled web of confusion. We've seen too much of this at ancestry, rootsweb already and even at WT in trying to sort the Mortons, Teagues and Thorntons. If any arborist or PM has an issue with this, please contact me, Jester-173
posted by Lynette Jester
Reeves-1498 and Reeves-1077 are not ready to be merged because: There is insufficient documentation - more data needs to be provided on both sides of the proposed match .
posted by Alexander Hunter Jr.

Rejected matches › Thomas Reeves I (1600-1650)

R  >  Reeves  >  Robert Francis Reeves

Categories: Norfolk, Unknown Place