no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Baltzer Remley (abt. 1793 - abt. 1868)

Baltzer (Balser) Remley
Born about in Berks, Pennsylvania, United Statesmap
Ancestors ancestors
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Father of
Died about at about age 74 in Pennsylvania, United Statesmap [uncertain]
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Kimberly Ann Hawkins private message [send private message] and Debbie Craig private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 2 Feb 2017
This page has been accessed 163 times.

Biography

Balser was born in 1793 in Amity Township, Berks County, Pennsylvania, the son of John Henry Remley and Susanna Leffel Remley. Her father, Balthazar Leffel, was his namesake.

Balser Remley married Elizabeth Nazer (or Wolford), probably before 1821. He had relocated to Franklin County by 1821.[1] He passed away in 1868.[2]

Balthazar was born in 1793. He was the son of Henry Remley and Susanna Leffel. He passed away in 1868.

Sources

  1. 1821 Pennsylvania, U.S., Septennial Census, 1779-1863, Montgomery, Franklin, Pennsylvania. Source Information: Ancestry.com. Pennsylvania, U.S., Septennial Census, 1779-1863 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2012. Original data: Septennial Census Returns, 1779–1863. Box 1026, microfilm, 14 rolls. Records of the House of Representatives. Records of the General Assembly, Record Group 7. Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission, Harrisburg, PA.
  2. A source for this information is needed.
  • 1830 United States Federal Census, Montgomery, Franklin, Pennsylvania. Source Citation: Year: 1830; Census Place: Montgomery, Franklin, Pennsylvania; Series: M19; Roll: 151; Page: 421; Family History Library Film: 0020625. Source Information: Ancestry.com. 1830 United States Federal Census [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2010. Images reproduced by FamilySearch. Original data: Fifth Census of the United States, 1830. (NARA microfilm publication M19, 201 rolls). Records of the Bureau of the Census, Record Group 29. National Archives, Washington, D.C.
  • 1860 Census: "United States Census, 1860"
    citing Page: 50; Affiliate Publication Number: M653; Affiliate Film Number: 1099; FHL microfilm: 805099; Record number: 9770;
    FamilySearch Record: MXP1-WCM (accessed 30 April 2023)
    FamilySearch Image: 33S7-9BS6-9MPC Image number 00255
    Balser Remley (67) in East Followfield Township, Crawford, Pennsylvania, United States. Born in Pennsylvania.
  • 1830 U.S. census. Montgomery Township, Franklin County, PA. Headed by Baltzer Remley. Counting two males 0–4, one male 5–9, one male 30–39, one female 0–4, three females 5–9, and one female 30–39. https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:33S7-9YBQ-ZPH https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:33SQ-GYBQ-691
  • Source: S1367594949 Ancestry Family Trees Publication: Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com. Original data: Family Tree files submitted by Ancestry members. Record Collection 1030Ancestry Family Tree




Is Balser your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Balser by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Balser:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 1

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Remley-279 and Remley-61 appear to represent the same person because: Birth and death information are close although parents don't match. For Remley-61, if you go up 2 generations the names are the same as parents of Remley-279, which is probably correct. Line of Remley-61 has no sources. May need to be an unmerged match.

R  >  Remley  >  Baltzer Remley