no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Sarah (Rich) Remick (1695 - 1773)

Sarah Remick formerly Rich aka Thatcher, Doane
Born in Eastham, Barnstable, Massachusetts Bay Colonymap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married 1 Nov 1720 in Eastham, Barnstable, Massachusettsmap
Wife of — married 9 Jan 1738 in Eastham, Barnstable, Massachusettsmap
Wife of — married 15 Sep 1760 in Truro, Barnstable, Massachusetts Bay Colonymap
Descendants descendants
Died at age 78 in Eastham, Barnstable, Massachusettsmap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Penny Douglass private message [send private message] and James Carr private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 21 Oct 2017
This page has been accessed 277 times.

Biography

Sarah was born 22 Jan 1695 at Eastham[1]Source Text Sarah Rich the daughter of Richard and Anne Rich was bom in Eastham January the 22d 1695/6[2]

She married 1st 01 Nov 1720 Thomas Thacher[3] Source Text:Thomas Thatcher and Sarah Rich were married in Eastham by John Doane Justice Peace November ye 11th 1720 Recorded John Paine Town clerk. Their intentions were recorded 23 Sep 1720 at Eastham[4] Source Text :September ye 23d : 1720 Thomas Thatcher of Eastham Signified his purpose to marrie with Sarah Rich of Eastham in order to be published

Children:

  • Elizabeth b: 24 May 1725
  • Jane b: 17 Mar 1726

She married 2nd 09 Jan 1738 David Doane[5] son of John and Hannah (Bangs) Doane. She is mentioned in his will. Source Text: Mr David Doane and Mrs Sarah Thacher married Janry : 4th 1738/9 all by the Reverend Mr: John Avery of Truro Recorded Pr me : Tho : Paine Town Clerk

She married a third time 15 Sep 1760 at Truro Christian RemickSource Text: mr Christian Remick & mrs Sarah Doan married September 15th 1760 All by Barnabas Paine Jus : Peace and Recorded by me on the Towns Book Barnabas Paine Town clerk[6][2]

She died 12 May 1773 at Eastham[2]

Sources

  1. Massachusetts: Vital Records, 1620-1850 Volume Eastham/Orleans Page MD V.4, p.34 Birth Record(Online Database: AmericanAncestors.org, New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2001-2010 Membership Required)
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Find A Grave: Memorial #21745635
  3. Massachusetts: Vital Records, 1620-1850 VOLUME:Eastham-Orleans - V1PAGE:MD V.16, p.31 Marriage Record(Online Database: AmericanAncestors.org, New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2001-2010 Membership Required)
  4. Massachusetts: Vital Records, 1620-1850 VOLUME:Eastham-Orleans - V1PAGE:MD V.28, p.111Intention Record(Online Database: AmericanAncestors.org, New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2001-2010 Membership Required)
  5. Massachusetts: Vital Records, 1620-1850 Volume Truro - V1 Page 10 Marriage Record(Online Database: AmericanAncestors.org, New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2001-2010 Membership Required)
  6. Massachusetts: Vital Records, 1620-1850 Volume Truro - V1 Page 91 Marriage Record(Online Database: AmericanAncestors.org, New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2001-2010 Membership Required)
  • 1st marriage - "Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001," database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QP8K-CJ3H : 11 May 2022), Thomas Thatcher and Sarah Rich, 11 Nov 1720; citing Marriage, Orleans, Barnstable, Massachusetts Bay Colony, British Colonial America, Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth, Boston; FHL microfilm 007009735.




Is Sarah your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Sarah by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Sarah:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 5

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Rich-3809 and Rich-3666 appear to represent the same person because: Having searched intensively through the available records and literature in databases of NEHGS, Ancestry, and FamilySearch, I cannot find any Sarah Rich (maiden _or_ married surname) born in this time period (say, 1685-1695) save for the Sarah Rich born 22 January 1695/6 at Eastham, the proven daughter of Richard (son of Richard) & Anne (Unknown) Rich.

A Sarah Rich was born about 1676 -- location uncertain -- to the senior Richard Rich & wife Sarah (Roberts) Rich; she married Isaac Baker at Eastham in 1702, so she certainly was not born in or close to 1691. A later Sarah Rich was born at Eastham in 1712 to Thomas & Mercy (Knowles) Rich. I do not find another person by this name whose birth is recorded, and the record transcribed, in Massachusetts Bay or Plymouth Colony in the assigned period.

I am thus respectfully proposing that Rich-3809 is in fact a duplicate profile and should be merged into Rich-3666, the lower-numbered profile... but preserving all contents of Rich-3809, which to the best of my knowledge is accurate in its presentation of data. I would also suggest that the different (estimated) DOB of 1691, and the indicated residence "of Middleboro", be retained from Rich-3666 and incorporated in a Research Notes section.

If any source is then subsequently located that demonstrates the existence of another Sarah Rich, "of Middleboro", born in or near 1691, a new profile can always be created, citing that source.

posted by Christopher Childs
James, just FYI, there is currently a discussion (in the Comments) on the profile of Sarah Rich that relates to this profile.

It is most likely that this profile should be merged into Rich-3666 (which has the lower number) -- but _retaining all the data and text from this profile_, which to the best of my knowledge is accurate (whereas Rich-3666 has very little data, and as far as I can tell, what's there is inaccurate).

I can add sources to this profile from NEHGS (americanancestors.org) if you would like; they're behind a paywall, but I can include the critical short sections of text that apply, so that profile visitors who do not have an NEHGS subscription will be able to see the exact wording. Just reply to this comment, or send me a private message, if you'd like me to do the homework.

posted on Rich-3809 (merged) by Christopher Childs
Rich-3174 and Rich-3666 are not ready to be merged because: The issue here is whether Rich-3666 is meant to be the profile for the Sarah Rich born at Eastham (not Middleboro as the profile currently states) on 22 January 1695/6 (not 1691), who was a daughter of Richard and Anne Rich... or whether the point of the profile was to delineate the wife of Jonathan Shaw, born at Eastham in 1703. She is correctly profiled in Rich-3174 -- born at Eastham in 1712, a daughter of Thomas and Mercy Rich.

If the former is the case, the merge should not happen: instead, the date and location of birth should be corrected, as indicated above.

If the latter is the case, then the merge should proceed.

I will also message the PM of Rich-3666 and put the above question to her.

posted by Christopher Childs
Review of the "Changes" page suggests that this profile was indeed originally intended to represent the earlier Sarah Rich, and that the link to Jonathan Shaw as husband (and Constanant Shaw as their son) was added later by another contributor.

I believe that this earlier Sarah may ultimately have had some connection to Middleboro (I now note that in the data section, she is shown as "of Middleboro" -- rather than as having necessarily been born there) by way of one of her two husbands, David Doane or Thomas Thatcher. I'm trying to relocate the source that left me with that impression.

posted by Christopher Childs
The earlier Sarah has, in fact, a WikiTree profile with her correct data, Rich-3809. Therefore, if the intention of this profile was to represent the Sarah Rich born 1695/6 -- the only Sarah Rich I am aware of born in Massachusetts in that timeframe -- Rich-3809 should be merged into Rich-3666 (the lower-numbered profile), retaining all the information presently found in Rich-3809.

I am inclined to propose that merge but would be happiest if the PM of this profile first weighs in on the question of (pardon my phrasing) which Rich is which.  :o)

posted by Christopher Childs

R  >  Rich  |  R  >  Remick  >  Sarah (Rich) Remick

Categories: Bridge Road Cemetery, Eastham, Massachusetts