no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

John Richards (1682 - 1756)

John Richards
Born in Beverly, Essex, Massachusetts Baymap
Ancestors ancestors
Husband of — married 17 Jun 1707 (to about Dec 1725) in Preston, New London, Connecticut Colonymap
Husband of — married 2 Jan 1727 in Preston, New London, Connecticut Colonymap
Descendants descendants
Died at age 74 in Preston, New London, Connecticut Colonymap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Robin Wedertz private message [send private message] and Keir Skinner private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 17 Jun 2012
This page has been accessed 518 times.

Biography

John Richards was born at Beverly, Essex County, Massachusetts Bay on 20 June 1682, the son of John Richards and his wife, Elizabeth Woodbury.[1] John died at Preston, Connecticut Colony, 18 September 1756.[2] He married at Preston, 17 June 1707, Abigail Woodward.[3] She was born Medford, Middlesex County, Massachusetts Bay, 14 February 1686, the daughter of Daniel Woodward and his wife, Elizabeth Dana.[4]

Sources

  1. Susan Kilbride, "The Identity of Elizabeth (Richards) Standish and the Richards Family of Beverly, Massachusetts, and Preston, Connecticut," Mayflower Descendant 68 (2020):187–191, at 190, 190n; digital images by subscription, AmericanAncestors.
  2. Susan Kilbride, "The Identity of Elizabeth (Richards) Standish and the Richards Family of Beverly, Massachusetts, and Preston, Connecticut," Mayflower Descendant 68 (2020):187–191, at 190, 190n; digital images by subscription, AmericanAncestors.
  3. Susan Kilbride, "The Identity of Elizabeth (Richards) Standish and the Richards Family of Beverly, Massachusetts, and Preston, Connecticut," Mayflower Descendant 68 (2020):187–191, at 190, 190n; digital images by subscription, AmericanAncestors.
  4. Susan Kilbride, "The Identity of Elizabeth (Richards) Standish and the Richards Family of Beverly, Massachusetts, and Preston, Connecticut," Mayflower Descendant 68 (2020):187–191, at 190, 190n; digital images by subscription, AmericanAncestors.
  • Ancestry.com. Connecticut, U.S., Town Marriage Records, pre-1870 (Barbour Collection) [database on-line]. Lehi, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2006, Genealogical Publishing Co.; Baltimore, Maryland, USA; The Barbour Collection of Connecticut Town Vital Records. Vol. 1-55; Author: White, Lorraine Cook, Ed.; Publication Date: 1994-2002; Volume: 35, p. 282.




Is John your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with John by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA test-takers in his direct paternal line. Mitochondrial DNA test-takers in the direct maternal line: It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with John:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 5

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
I corrected the parents on the orphaned profile of the daughter so that the birth VR and the parents' marriage VR are consistent.
posted by Tim Prince
Richards-2102 and Richards-463 are not ready to be merged because: Per Tim Prince the parents and siblings on Richards-2102 do not belong and should be detached prior to a merge progressing. If additional sources are available on Richards-2102 from PMs please advise.

PMs on this profile should revise by removing parents currently shown before a merge should proceed.

posted by Lydia Vierson
Richards-463 and Richards-2102 match in spouse and dates, but the parents and siblings on Richards-2012 don't belong to this couple. The parents and the listed siblings on Richards-463 appear to be correct, with the parents matching VR.
posted by Tim Prince
Richards-463 and Richards-2102 are not ready to be merged because: Different mothers
posted by Lydia Vierson
Richards-463 and Richards-2102 appear to represent the same person because: Same
posted by G (Volk) V

R  >  Richards  >  John Richards