no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

John M. Rogers (abt. 1680 - abt. 1762)

John M. Rogers
Born about in Chesapeake Bay, Rappahannock County, Virginiamap
Ancestors ancestors
Son of [uncertain] and [uncertain]
Husband of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died about at about age 81 in Dunkirk, King and Queen County, Virginiamap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Tommy Roye private message [send private message] and Todd Altic private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 14 Sep 2010
This page has been accessed 5,313 times.

Contents

Biography

He was descended from John "the Martyr" Rogers, the first protestant martyr executed under the reign of Mary Tudor (Bloody Mary), Queen of England in 1555.

His parents were probably distant cousins to one another, Giles Rogers, Sr. (1642-1730) and Rachel (Eastham) Rogers (1643-1735) who married about 1672 in Worcestershire, England and emigrated to the colonies.

John Rogers was born on 26 Feb 1680, either on at sea aboard the ship "HMS George" or after the vessel came to anchor in the Chesapeake Bay, Rappahannock County, Virginia.

He obtained a fairly good education, and at manhood became an explorer and land surveyor, and took up much land in the "Tide-water" section of Virginia. [1]

John Rogers married about 1716 in Virginia to Mary (Byrd) Rogers [2] [3] (1683-1763), youngest daughter of Mary (Horsmanden) and Col. William Byrd who owned vast lands in Virginia. Mary and John Rogers would probably have inherited a part of that land where they resided.

John Rogers died about 1762 in Dunkirk, King and Queen County, Virginia. [4]

Children

  1. Giles Rogers 1719-1794
  2. John Page Rogers, Jr. c1720-1797
  3. George Rogers, b: 11 Jun 1721; d: 1802
  4. Lucy (Rogers) Redd, c1725-1764
  5. Mary (Rogers) Johnston 1727-1800
  6. Byrd Rogers, Sr. 1727-1801
  7. Ann (Rogers) Clark, b: 21 Oct 1728; d: 1798
  8. Mildred Rogers 1733-1788
  9. George Rogers 1736-1802
  10. Rachel (Rogers) Robertson 1737-1792
  11. David Rogers 1740-1799
  12. William Rogers 1744-1816
  13. Clement Rogers 1747-1820.

Research Notes

Sources are needed to confirm his correct years ...

b: 26 Feb 1680 ?
b: 26 Feb 1683 ?
d: 1762 ?
d: 1768 ?

==

It has been argued that his wife was named Rachel Rogers and his mother was named Mary Rogers.

There are two "Rachel" Easthams in this genealogy, but they are not the same person. They are in two different generations.

The parents of John (b: 1680) were Giles Rogers (b: 1643) and Rachel Eastham (b: 1645).

The parents of Rachel (b: 1695) were George Eastham (b" 1663) and Mary Bird (b: 1673).

Rachel Eastham (b: 1645) and George Eastham (b: 1663) may have shared the same grandparents.

==

Re: Mary BYRD - James DUKE - John ROGERS controversy
Date: 24 Aug 2010 by Alexani
In Reply to: Bill Davidson

Mary Bird (b. 1673) is NOT a "WESTOVER" Byrd. This Mary Bird is a "POPLAR GROVE" Bird of the Robert "I" Bird (b. 1637 New Kent Co., VA) family - Family Plantation named "POPLAR GROVE" in King & Queen Co., VA. This Mary Bird's brother is Robert "II" "The Sheriff" Bird (b: 1681). Reference sources are Last Will and Testaments filed in Virginia archives.

It is possible that the WESTOVER Byrds and the POPLAR GROVE Birds share a common ancestor buried many generations back in England but they were not considered close relations in Virginia.

Romantic Speculation: There are those who claim that John Rogers' marriage to Rachel Eastham was his second marriage. At the time of their marriage in 1716 John was 36 years old and Rachel was 21, so he certainly had plenty of time to make a first marriage. These same claimants look to Mary Byrd (b: 1682/83) of WESTOVER to be his first wife. However, there are NO primary sources to substantiate this claim and there are NO children of issue for this couple noted in any primary source material. There is evidence per the "Secret Diaries" of Col. Wm. Byrd II (Mary Byrd's older brother) indicating that the WESTOVER Mary Byrd was married into the Duke family. All the children born to John Rogers (b. 1680) starting in 1617 were certainly the children of his wife, Rachel Eastham (b: 1695). There are no known records of any marriage of John Rogers (b: 1680) to anyone other than Rachel Eastham (b: 1695).

Sources

  1. http://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Rogers-288
  2. Virginia, Select Marriages 1785-1940
  3. Virginia Compiled Marriages
  4. Find A Grave: Memorial #162537317 for John Rogers, Sr., b: 1680 Virginia, USA; d: 1762; as burial unknown
  • Virginia - Land, Marriage and Probate Records
  • "U.S., Sons of the American Revolution Membership Applications 1889-1970" v328; SAR Membership #65512
  • Alabama Surname Files Expanded, John Roger b: 1680; d: 1762 King and Queen County, Virginia
  • "U.S. and International Marriage Records, 1560-1900" by Yates Publishing citing source#3177; code: KHW & source#20501; code: WAY




Is John your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with John by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with John:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 8

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Rogers-9083 and Rogers-288 do not represent the same person because: not a match
posted by Sharon Danbrook
Can someone please verify, once and for all, whether the Byrd family of Westover fame & fortune, married into this Rogers family? And MOST sources list a Rachel Eastham as wife of Giles, but no Eastham as a wife of John b1680. Can we clear up why the differences? Or not?
posted by Karen Hardesty
Rogers-10841 and Rogers-288 appear to represent the same person because: Please merge.

Thank you

posted by Rita (Talton) Barrett
Rogers-288 and Rogers-26135 appear to represent the same person because: Same parents. Same birth date/location. Same death location/similar death date. Same spouse. Please merge. Thank you.
Rogers-10841 and Rogers-288 do not represent the same person because: One died age 15, the other 82. So. The spouse attributed to Rogers-10841 is totally out of place
posted by [Living Poole]
Rogers-10841 and Rogers-288 appear to represent the same person because: apprent duplicatt.
posted by Lynette Jester
This John Rogers was descended from John "the Martyr" Rogers, the first protestant martyr executed under the reign of Mary Tudor (Bloody Mary), Queen of England in 1555. Google him and read his interesting history.
posted by Malcolm Hill Jr.
Notes for John Rogers: John Rogers, b. 1680 on shipboard at sea, or after the vessel came to anchor in the Chesapeake Bay. He obtained a fairly good education, and at manhood became an explorer and land surveyor, and took up much land in the "Tide-water" section of Virginia. He m. 1716 Mary Byrd (poss)**, b. 1683, youngest. daughter of Col. William Byrd (the elder) by Mary Horsmanden, his wife--of "Westover," VA;
posted by [Living Ward]

R  >  Rogers  >  John M. Rogers