no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Mary (Rood) Parish (1703 - abt. 1755)

Mary Parish formerly Rood
Born in Norwich, New London, Connecticutmap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died about [location unknown]
Profile manager: Jim Parish private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 28 Aug 2009
This page has been accessed 609 times.


Mary Rudel/Rood married Samuel Parish at the Congregational Church in Lisbon, Jewett City, New London County, Connecticut.[1][2]

She died about 1755.[3]

Research Notes

  • Searched Mary Rudel on Family Search, with only parameter a birth date of 1600 to 1750. No hits for our Mary. Searches on Ancestry identify Mary Rood Rudel as one and the same. More research necessary. They could be one and same, not enough data to know for sure.
  • Many trees on Ancestry, Heritage, Geni and others list Mary Rood as the husband of Samuel Parish, but without any sources. "Roswell Parish" also lists a Mary Rood (but no birth date given) as Samuel's wife.[4] Without a birth date, it is difficult to make that connection with Wiki's Rood-9. When an actual marriage record of the time names Mary Rudel as the spouse, that must be the choice for the present. Later in the same source that names Mary Rudel, there is a recitation that Benjamin Parish of Preston marries Mary Rude of Canterbury on Jan 29, 1735-6. Research has yet to be done, but a family tree has been found which names Benjamin's bride as Mercy or Marcy Rood, one of Mary's sisters.


  1., Early Connecticut Marriages ( Operations, Inc., 2012, Provo, UT, USA),, Image of record
  2. NOTE: for non-ancestry subscribers, the image was available at two websites on November 26, 2016: New Horizons Genealogy, 1724 - 1800 Congregational Church, Lisbon, Connecticut, Early Marriage Records or New London County, Connecticut, Genealogy and History, Lisbon Marriage Records, transcribed by Friends of Free Genealogy; Original Source: Early Connecticut Marriages as Found on Ancient Church Records Prior to 1800, edited by Frederic W. Bailey ©1896
  3. A source for this information is needed.
  4. Parish, Roswell, 1840-1932 and Parish, Roswell, 1873- ; New England Parish families: Descendants of John Parish of Groton, Mass, and Preston, Conn. (The Tuttle Publishing Company, Inc., Rutland, Vt., 1938) "Compiled by Roswell Parish, Jr., from notes gathered by his father, Roswell Parish," page 20.

More Genealogy Tools

Sponsored Search

Is Mary your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Mary by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Mary:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.

Sponsored by Ancestry ®

Family History Search.


Enter a grandparent's name. Just one grandparent can lead you to many discoveries.

Comments: 1

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Rudel-14 and Rood-9 appear to represent the same person because: Rudel-14 created in error as spouse of Samuel Parish, then discovered Rood-9 was the correct spouse. I would like to merge these two. I have already been editing Rood 9 to reflect marriage and children.
posted by Jim Parish

R  >  Rood  |  P  >  Parish  >  Mary (Rood) Parish