no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

William Rose (aft. 1584 - 1664)

William "1st of Clava, Rose of Fleenes and Clava" Rose
Born after in Englandmap
Ancestors ancestors
Husband of — married 2 Jul 1610 in Sussex, Englandmap
Descendants descendants
Died before age 80 [location unknown]
Profile last modified | Created 23 Jan 2013
This page has been accessed 1,318 times.

Biography

Second son of William, the eleventh Laird of Kilravock... This gentleman was had in great respect as a man of prudence and valour. In his advanced years he was tutor to his grand-nephew Hugh, the thirteenth Laird of Kilravock, which trust he executed with the greatest fidelity. For the public good of the countrie, he built a stone bridge of several arches over the impetuous river at the town of Nairn, in the year 1631; and in the year 1660 he built a bridge of one arch over the same river, called the bridge of Cantray, five miles above the town of Nairn. He acquired a fine fortune, lived to near eighty years, and died August 13th, 1664, leaving by his wife, a daughter of Chisholm of Comer, two sons and a daughter...[1]

Note

Note: {geni:about_me} http://archive.org/stream/agenealogicalde00shawgoog#page/n543/mode/2up
  • Fact: Christening (08 Sep 1584) St Laurance, Heanor, Derbyshire, England
  • Fact: Burial (23 May 1666) Chithurst, Sussex, England

"of Clava"

Sources

  1. A Genealogical Deduction of the Family of Rose of Kilravock, The Spalding Club, Edinburgh 1848, p529
  • Paul Gifford "Falconer of Halkerton"




Is William your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of William's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 5

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Rose-11108 and Rose-2344 do not represent the same person because: There is a conflict in the parents of both spouses which should be resolved before merger.
posted by Bill Pulver
Rose-11108 and Rose-2344 appear to represent the same person because: Clear duplicate.
posted by K. Cathey
Rose-8987 and Rose-2344 appear to represent the same person because: Daughter due to be merged
posted by Callum Simms
Rose-3093 and Rose-2344 appear to represent the same person because: 2nd son of William 11th of Kilravock (see source)
posted by Callum Simms
Rose-6899 and Rose-2344 do not represent the same person because: Rose-2344 appears to be Rose-6899's great-grandson (see note at http://www.clanmacfarlanegenealogy.info/genealogy/TNGWebsite/getperson.php?personID=I90651&tree=CC (re eldest son))
posted by Callum Simms

R  >  Rose  >  William Rose