Sarah was born about 1749. Sarah Rose ... [1] Ross' work shows about 1752 as the birth date for Sarah. [2]
Name might have been Sarah "Ross." [3][4] Also, it is stated in the same text that she survived Stephen and then married "Nathaniel Seabury, a brother of Bishop Seabury."
Click the Changes tab for the details of contributions by Rae and others.
Is Sarah your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Sarah by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Sarah:
I have initiated a merge for her husband and son, Frederick, so no action needs to be taken at this time for the obvious duplicates attached to this profile.
Ross-27492 and Ross-12642 appear to represent the same person because: I adopted this profile under the LNAB of "Rose." I found several sources that said her LNAB was "Ross." One source said she was the daughter of George and Joanna Ross. Changing the LNAB to Ross created a duplicate.
I have initiated a merge for her husband and son, Frederick, so no action needs to be taken at this time for the obvious duplicates attached to this profile.